They point to the Celtic's rousing victory on the road against the San Antonio Spurs on March 17th. They claim Doc Rivers had a lesson in mind when he played five players buried deep in the Celtics bench for the entire fourth quarter of a close game against the equally woeful Charlotte Bobcats. The real "experts" even go as far to point to the NBA Draft of 1997, where these same Celtics missed out on future All-Pro Tim Duncan despite having the worst record in the league.
What most seem not to understand is throwing a season is not as simple as it seems. Only the general manager of the Celtics, Danny Ainge, should be fully for the effort. Everyone else, from the head coach to the players, still wants to win.
Is Herm Edwards really the only person who knows you play to win the game? What athlete, professional or not, will say they don't want to win every game? What athlete will put their own statistics, wins and everything else aside so that his team can get a young player for next year?
Forget the notion that having the most losses doesn't guarantee a top pick. It does. The team with the worst record gets no worse than the fourth pick in the draft. In a draft as deep as this year's, a top-five draft pick is money.
And if the NBA wants to criticize teams losing intentionally, they should take a good hard look at themselves first. David Stern has made it clear that the NBA is a business first, entertainment second. In no other business do losing teams get rewarded. By awarding high draft picks to bad teams, Stern is just igniting the fire. At the same time, it does make sense to give teams that finish out of the playoffs a better pick than those in the postseason.
The solution? Keep the lottery for the worst fourteen teams, but get rid of the weighted probabilities based on records. Give each team a 1/14 chance of landing the top pick. It is a simple management strategy of not rewarding teams for behavior the league does not want.
Winning creates an atmosphere that can be used to propel a team to future success. Every team should try to win as many games as possible. By taking away the rewards for losing, the quality of basketball as a whole should go up.
Published by Ankur Amin
I am a college student who loves to watch, talk and write about sports. My favorite teams are based in Detroit, but I try my best to say unbiased. View profile
Bill Parcells, Dallas Cowboys Head Coach, RetiresBill Parcells, controversial NFL head coach of the Dallas Cowboys, retires by e-mail.- Wildcat Head Coach Billy Gillispie Handed $6 Million and a Pink SlipUniversity of Kentucky head coach to be given the boot by school officials today. The boot will, however, be filled with about $6 million dollars.
New Head Coach Chip Kelly and the Oregon Ducks in 2009It is hard enough to be a new head coach in college football. But to be a new head coach at the University of Oregon in the Pac-10 conference is even tougher. The Pac-10 has USC...
Los Angeles Clippers Get First Pick in 2009 NBA Draft, Memphis Will Pick...The shocking results from the 2009 NBA Draft Lottery are really going to shake up the league this season, as three teams leap-frogged into the Top 3 Draft Slots.- 2007 NBA Draft ReviewLast night, the NBA draft came and went. Many teams' fans are left dreaming about what the future holds for their new superstars and fans of other teams are left scratching their head.
- 2003 NBA Draft Report Cards (Picks 21-29 and Select 2nd Round Breakouts)
- The Final Three Teams of Amazing Race Asia Season 3: Which Team Will Win the Final...
- Russell Westbrook: NBA Draft Profile
- 2009 NBA Draft Lottery Holds Joy for Some Franchises
- NBA Draft 2009 Results Are In, with Many Teams Picking Up Some Key Players for Nex...
- 2008 NBA Draft Review
- Cincinnati Bearcats Hire Butch Jones as Head Coach


5 Comments
Post a CommentWhat the heck are you talking about? In every other sports league the worst team DOES get the first pick.
GMs look at tanking from a business standpoint. Look at Cleveland. Didn't they make the right decision by tanking one season to get LeBron in terms of selling tickets and creating a fanbase? The only way to get rid of tanking is to take away the beneficial aspects of it.
If fans won't want to watch the tanking team (costing them $$$) and if tanking will cost a coach their job, why institute an anti-tanking rule?
The problem with teams that tank is they take the fun out of the game. The NBA is a business where the customers are the fans. No fan wants to watch a game where one team is dogging it and not playing hard. Heck, I don't want to see my team win that way.
My experience has been that while players may do stupid things and take plays off, they all want to win for the most part. Coaches in the NBA have such short tenure that tanking could cost them their job with GMs looking for someone to blame. With sixteen teams in the playoffs, there is plenty of room for parity in the NBA without rewarding teams who, basically, don't do their jobs.
You say only the GM should want to tank, but I would argue the exact opposite - that the coach, fans, and even some players would want to (in the hopes of a future championship). Interesting solution. That would really hurt parity though. I say if a team wants to tank, just let them.