How Tackling Obesity Issues Not Only Address Healthcare Related Concerns but is Also Beneficial to the Environment
The Environmental and Societal Impact of Obesity
Myth: Obesity cannot be prevented because it is primarily genetic.
Truth: Over the past two decades the rate of obesity has increased to over 30% of the U.S. population in up to 14 states. Although some individuals may have a genetic predisposition to the condition, it is primarily driven through diet and lifestyle choices.
Myth: Obesity harms the individual but does not impact society as a whole. So, leave these individuals alone.
Truth: Studies have shown that obesity causes a substantial increase in various diseases which include heart disease, cancers and autoimmune conditions. When individuals suffer from these conditions, society suffer from loss of productivity (workers' absences) and government subsidized healthcare costs.
Myth: There is no correlation between environmental impact vs. obesity.
Truth: When individuals engage in obesity preventative measures, there is a positive environmental impact. Specifically, individuals are encouraged to exercise more (thereby reducing their carbon footprint from automobile use) and consume healthier foods (processed foods and meats tend to result in greater carbon footprint compared to healthy vegetable and fruit alternatives). Reduction in electronic use (reduction in television time, internet surfing and video game playing) also leads to less electric energy use in the environment.
Myth: Government interventions will not make an impact on obesity conditions.
Truth: Many recent success stories in other public health areas such as prohibiting smoking in public areas in New York City has resulted in a significant reduction in smoking shows that government regulation and intervention will make an impact.
Myth: It will take a long time to see the positive results of obesity preventative measures.
Truth: Studies have shown that a reduction in BMI (Body Mass Index) results in a reduction in major risks of various health conditions (heart disease, cancers and chronic conditions).
Myth: The government will control what I eat.
Truth: By offering healthy options in school lunch programs or requiring packaged food companies to display consumer friendly nutrition labels, the government will enable the end consumer to become more aware of his/her food choices. At the end of the day, it is always up to the individual to make the food selection or food purchase.
Published by Judy Liu
Judy Liu is the founder of www.eco-friendlyliving.com. She writes about healthcare issues, parenthood, environmentally responsible home improvement projects, and green living. View profile
- Heart Disease in WomenPrevention is key when it comes to women and heart disease.
- Heart Disease: A Look at the Leading Killer of WomenHeart disease kills more women age 65 and older than all cancers combined. Women need to pay attetion to symptoms and to prevention measures.
- Reduce Your Carbon Footprint: Save Energy, Save Electricity'Got green energy' and 'carbon footprints' are the newest lingo terms around. Everyone is looking to save energy, save electricity, go green and reduce their carbon footprint.
- The Environmental Impact of NanotechnologyThis report looks at the recent development of nanotechnology and its environmental impact by studying the beneficial applications of technology and the consequential risks posed by it on the environment and the public.
- Carbon Offsetting Reduces Your Carbon FootprintLearn what Carbon Offsetting is and how it helps you eliminate your carbon footprint.
- Burning Man Gets Help Offsetting His Carbon Footprint
- Carbon Footprint Calculators, Emissions Trading and Carbon Free Products
- Heart Disease Number One Killer of Women in the United States
- Reduce Your Carbon Footprint by Eliminating Junk Mail
- Processed Meats Increase Heart Disease, Diabetes and Cancer Risk
- Healthy Eating to Avoid Cancer, Diabetes and Heart Disease
- The BMI ( Indicator Of Heart Disease Risk ) is Wrong



