How Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx is More like Mac OS X Than Ever

Jared Spurbeck
Like 'em or hate 'em, Macs are more popular now than ever! And a good deal of their popularity is thanks to Mac OS X, the "operating system" that makes a Mac a Mac and comes installed on each one.

Among other things, Ubuntu is a free operating system that you can use to make your PC more like a Mac. So how does Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx, the new version coming this April, help with that? Read on and find out ... both the good ways, and the not-so-good.

New visual style

First off, the system tray. It looks like they're trying to make all of Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx's most commonly-used system tray icons monochrome, like the simple, visually uncluttered icons used on most Macs.

Ubuntu Lucid Lynx is also getting a new icon scheme, with a bright purple color that seems to have been inspired by Mac OS X Leopard's default wallpaper ... at least, that's what it reminds me of. This goes with its new "Light" visual style, making almost a complete rebranding of Ubuntu.

The most controversial aspect of the redesign is the decision to put the "close window" buttons on the left-hand side of the windows instead of the right. This is the way that things are on Mac OS X ... but why? The buttons in Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx aren't even in the same order as on Mac OS X. Mark Shuttleworth, the founder of Ubuntu, insists that this is just the first step in an amazing redesign that he has ideas for, but a lot of people are skeptical.

Proprietary tie-ins

Proprietary means "You can only get this from one source," usually because they have a government-granted monopoly in the form of a patent or copyright. Most of Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx will still be free to download and share, as well as free for others to tinker with and build on -- the freedoms that made Ubuntu what it is today. Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx, however, will be tied in to things that you can't share, or improve or build on.

For instance, the Ubuntu Software Center looks like it'll soon feature pay-for apps ... apps that you can't share with your friends, and that may well be throwaway apps like many of the ones on the iTunes App Store ... since, like on the iTunes App Store, their makers will be paid by how many times they are downloaded. It'll also feature a pay-for music store, tied into their online service called Ubuntu One.

The Upshot

These last few features wouldn't be any surprise if they came from Apple -- the "grand masters" of proprietary shininess. But Ubuntu has always been about sharing. Just look at those people holding hands on the CD covers!

These steps towards proprietary software and online services suggest that Mark Shuttleworth wants to imitate Steve Jobs' company in more ways than one. Not only is he trying to make Ubuntu more like Mac OS X, he's also trying to sell a product that nobody else can make. In essence, instead of trying to leverage the Ubuntu brand, community, and volunteers, to create an experience that cannot be duplicated, he's trying to keep Ubuntu's online service offerings from being duplicated by using the force of law. Again, it wouldn't be surprising coming from anyone else. But it's not what Ubuntu stands for.

What do you think? Am I totally off? Let me know in the comments, perhaps. And whether you're planning on upgrading to Ubuntu 10.4 Lucid Lynx or not, have fun with your computer!

DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL CONNECTION:
The Contributor has no connection to nor was paid by the brand or product described in this content.

Published by Jared Spurbeck - Featured Contributor in Technology

I'm a tabletop gamer and technology enthusiast, who is passionate about social justice and open-source software. I was also raised in the Mormon church, and enjoy bringing a former member's perspective to di...  View profile

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jared Spurbeck5/19/2010

    I'm actually switching back to Ubuntu soon!

  • Anon5/19/2010

    I must say, Ubuntu is far better than Mac OSX if you know how to configure it.

  • Jared Spurbeck4/20/2010

    Thank you, MyName, that was very informative. ~.^

  • MyName4/20/2010

    apple owns purple and blue because they put them in their wallpapers

  • Jared Spurbeck3/30/2010

    You mean it isn't now? ~.^ And how do you "own" something that you can't share with your friends, you can't help to improve, you can only get from one company, and you're always dependent on that one single company for updates to it? Just something to consider!

  • Karsten3/30/2010

    I don't this is a big problem. I love the idea to have an opensource OS, which brings in paid songs or apps. There is no problem to have to pay for things, if you then actually then own what you bought. It's your choice what you buy, and in this way Ubuntu might become an OS you CAN use for everyday computing.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.