The contorted plans from Clinton and Obama are not sufficient reforms. And what John McCain has proposed is sheer nonsense and by itself should cause any conscious American to avoid voting for him.
Fights for health care system reform are centered in Congress, as if legislators will do what they have never done before: achieve true, major and systemic reforms that only serve the public interest, not lobbyists and campaign contributors from business sectors.
Both Clinton and Obama believe that Americans have a moral right to universal health care. If this is correct and if this is what you believe, then achieving universal health care that covers absolutely everyone by making health care affordable to absolutely everyone, as it is in many other nations, requires a different kind of government action. What exactly?
We must expand the Bill of Rights as embodied in the US Constitution to include the right to affordable universal health care. The time has come for the public to conclude that the right to universal health care is as important and necessary as the right to free speech and all the other beloved constitutional rights. Common sense says that health care is a right, not a privilege.
After all, what good are our current constitutional rights if you are ill or dying prematurely because of a lack of good health insurance? Certainly the pursuit of happiness cannot be successful when individuals are suffering from poor health because of inadequate health care.
Why would sensible, caring Americans be against a constitutional right to universal health care? Are there people who would stand up and publicly condemn the right of all Americans to have first rate health care? The only ones I can imagine doing this are those now benefitting financially from the current unjust system, those blocking necessary congressional actions.
What Obama and Clinton should explicitly and loudly advocate is a constitutional amendment that makes universal health care a nonnegotiable right of all Americans.
Why has no member of Congress submitted legislation to get Congress to propose such an amendment for ratification by the states? Clearly, the only rational answer are the many business interests that have corrupted Congress and that benefit from the current system. The Constitution provides an alternative.
Article V provides an option never used in the entire history of the US, because Congress has refused to obey the Constitution and respect state requests. The Article V convention option was put in the Constitution because the Founders and Framers believed that one day Americans would lose trust and confidence in the federal government. With 81 percent of Americans believing the nation is on the wrong track and with so many millions of Americans lacking good health insurance and care, that day has surely arrived. And with abysmally low levels of confidence in Congress and the president, an Article V convention - a temporary fourth branch of the federal government - is clearly the right path to obtaining a universal health care amendment. A convention of state delegates could debate such an amendment and if they agreed to propose it, then the standard ratification by three-quarters of the states would still be necessary.
Yes, this would probably take a few years. But it would be worth it. The prospect of Congress, even with Clinton or Obama as president, achieving universal health care without business-friendly loopholes faster than the amendment approach is not good. The process of pursuing such an amendment, moreover, would help keep pressure on Congress to do the right thing.
If this sounds reasonable and necessary, then learn the truth about the Article V option at www.foavc.org and start talking up a universal health care amendment that Hillary and Obama should support.
[Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through www.delusionaldemocracy.com; he is a co-founder of Friends of the Article V Convention.]
Published by Joel Hirschhorn
Author: Delusional Democracy, Prosperity Without Pollution & Sprawl Kills. Senior official Congressional Office of Technology Assessment & National Governors Assn; full prof Univ. of Wisc. Publishing regul... View profile
- Don't Knock Universal Health Care Till You've Tried ItMany Americans are vehemently against the concept of health care supported by tax dollars. Having experienced both sides of the medical insurance issue, I want to share my opinions on this controversial subject.
- Universal Health Care: Ethical Issues in Health Care Reform in the USUniversal health care can only be successfully implemented in a society where all citizens embrace the ideas that the members of society have moral obligations to each other.
- Should Faith Healing Be Included in Universal Health CareFaith healers, acupuncture, herbal remedies and holistic medicine is waiting to see if they will be included in Universal Health care.
- Medicare & Medicaid Cuts: Do You Support Universal Health Care?Obama plans on Medicare and Medicaid cuts to pay for Universal Health Care, along with other interesting cuts that could interfere with the services received by your physician. Do you support Universal Health Care?
- J.S. Woodsworth: Pioneer in the Call for Universal Health CareA study of one of the pioneers in the call for universal health care, and how his accomplishments in Canada are facing a systematic dismantling.
- Universal Health Care: Governments Clever Scheme to Rob America
- Universal Health Care in America
- Will Ted Kennedy's Last Major Accomplishment Be Universal Health Care?
- Universal Health Care Could Mean the End of US Citizenship
- The Case for Universal Health Care
- Can Americans Adopt a Universal Health Care System?
- Universal Health Care Establishment Reform


1 Comments
Post a CommentFantastic stuff clearly and cooly stated. I wish more Americans felt the way you do and could express themselves in such an intelligent, mater-of-fact way. I'm learning how not to get so caught up in the raw emotion of political social reform. Keep up the good fight!