How Will Early Voting Impact the Decision on Election Day?

More Than 20 Million Americans Have All Ready Cast Their Ballots. How Will This Effect the Outcome of the 2008 Presidential Race?

Anne Stjern
This Tuesday, November 4, the United States voter will finally get to have our say in who will take over for George W. Bush and become the 44th President of the United States. The push to get out the vote has been strenuous on both the Democratic and Republican sides of the contest and coupled with the country's economic problems, the lingering war in Iraq, and the health care crisis, it is anticipated that Americans will vote in record numbers. The percentage of those eligible to cast a ballot who have taken advantage of early voting is estimated at a staggering 30% or higher. One of many academics who are keeping tabs on the vote is political scientist Michael P. McDonald of George Mason University. McDonald says that as of Nov 1, as many as 20 million people have all ready cast their ballots. The long lines at polling stations reported in all 31 states that allow early voting clearly indicated the level of interest Americans have in the outcome of this presidential race. Waits of more than 2 hours are now typical in several states including Florida, California, and Senator McCain's home state of Arizona.

In Florida, one of the hotly contested battleground states, the early voter turnout has stunned officials. As of October 30, absentee voting has all ready surpassed the 2004 total with four days to go. According to the Annenberg Public Policy Center, in the 2004 election approximately 20% of eligible voters cast their ballots early. This was up from the 14% reported in 2000. If the numbers hold, it is expected that as many as 45% of those eligible will vote prior to the November 4 election day. This statistic will surely increase the overall voting percentages, which can only benefit the country.

It has long been a sore point that so few Americans exercise their right to vote. Perhaps instead of referring to it as our "right" to vote, it would convey a more appropriate meaning if Americans thought of it as our responsibility. The sentiment that a single vote will not affect the outcome of any political race is often sited as an excuse for not managing the trip to the polls. The belief that since the popular vote does not determine the winner in a presidential election, as illustrated in the 2000 Bush-Gore campaign, there is no point in voting is misguided and leads to a disruption of the process. A single ballot can absolutely make a difference when electing the next president. The electoral vote given to the candidate is based on the number of votes actually cast for that individual. In 2004, Iowa's seven electoral votes went to President George W. Bush; however, it was an extremely tight race. The percentage of votes Bush actually received was within .06 percentage points of those John Kerry received. It can certainly be argued that had more of Iowa's 2.2 million eligible voters exercised their right to vote, the outcome could have been in Kerry's favor. As it was, only 1.5 million Iowans went to the polls and all seven of their electoral votes went to Bush. The difference in actual votes was only 10,059. There is no slight to Iowa intended here. It is only an illustration of how important a single ballot can be. Although the 2004 election had record turnout, other states had similar participation rates, which resulted in millions of votes wasted.

In years past, the weather has played a significant role in the number of voters actually showing up at the polls. The idea of standing for hours in long lines in rain, snow or extreme cold has discouraged many from making the trip. Perhaps with more access to early voting, an increased awareness of the importance of a single vote, and a renewed belief that participating in an election is a responsibility all Americans share, a more representative government will emerge.

Sources:

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/world/bal-md.enthusiasm01nov01,0,5999644.story.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2008/11/01/20081101earlyvoting1101.html

http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/NewsDetails.aspx?myId=304

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/campaign-2008/story/751034.html

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/IA/P/00/

Published by Anne Stjern

Part-time writer for several online publishers. Full-time marketing coordinator for a small land planning, civil engineering & landscape architecture design firm.  View profile

13 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Kofi Bofah12/8/2008

    Didn't seem to matter too much. The electoral college was a rout for Obama - although the popular vote was split pretty evenly.

  • Onemargaret11/9/2008

    Great article, Anne!

  • Janie Ellington11/3/2008

    Thank you, Anne, for such a well-written, level-headed, non-partisan reminder to everyone to go vote. I found your article a big encouragement. Keep 'em coming.

  • Anne Stjern11/3/2008

    Michael,

    South Carolina has limited early voting and only in the form of absentee voting. One of the qualifying circumstances for absentee voting here is if there is a death in your family or a funeral for a family member within 3 days of Election Day. However, you must have your absentee voter application into the voter registration office no later than 4 days prior to the election. This may present a problem for those who are not planning on a family member dying within 3 days of the election. You gotta love South Carolina!

    Personally, I prefer to go to the polls on Election Day to cast my vote. My younger daughter and go together and have since she turned 18. It has become a tradition for us. I do know that there has been some grumbling in SC about not being able to easily vote early, so I think it's going to become more the norm than a trend. This election may be the turning point.

  • Michael K. Miller11/2/2008

    Well-written and documented write, Anne. A recent phenom (2000), I think 'early voting' is a flawed procedural tool playing more to marketing tricks and logistics manipulation. The moment of truth in a democracy is the individual vote. That moment of truth should be a single point in time. As you noted, voting is a responsibility - arguably, it is THE responsibility of the individual citizen in a democracy. Btw: does SC have early voting? How do you feel about that? Write On, Michael

  • Bobby Tall Horse11/2/2008

    For me..I'd rather see the day off for everyone and more machines. I don't like all this early voting .. I think it invites trouble. Nice article thanks!

  • Christine Bruness11/2/2008

    Nicely done. Just think: it will all be over in two days!

  • Mr. Dave11/2/2008

    Hopefully, I can cast my vote in the morning before work to dodge the evening lines. If people vote early, the lines will be shorter on election day itself :)

  • Justice Lives Not11/2/2008

    What a well-researched and written article. Myself, I see early voting as a mixed blessing, since it is much more convenient for busy, time-strapped folks like myself, but adversely, if something really unpleasant and dirty comes out about the guy you voted for, it's too late to change it, and you're stuck. Really quite a paradox, no?

  • Carol Bengle Gilbert11/2/2008

    Great article. I too am wondering about the effects of early voting and what it may mean or not to the outcome.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.