Some of the most fervent criticism against human cloning comes from religious objections, including the belief that cloning is unnatural and against God's will. Cloning is considered unnatural by many people who believe that it separates reproduction from sexual activity. On the contrary, this can be seen as an advantage as married couples who cannot procreate by sexual activity for whatever reason are able to have children that are truly theirs. Life's most primitive goal is to reproduce and all cloning does is offer another method of reproduction. Reproduction by cloning and not by traditional sexual activity should not be focus of condemnation in any way as in our world birth control has allowed sex to be independent of reproduction, which is undeniably a greater immoral issue than cloning. A second religious objection to cloning is the thought that cloning is "playing God." This topic seems to be one of the most repetitive arguments as it has been used to criticize not only cloning, but also organ transplants, birth control, and any other attempt by humans to regulate and alter their lives in ways not allowed by various religious customs. In a country which was built on religious freedom, why should religion even come to be a factor in the scientific advancements of the United States? If the decision on whether to continue developing and researching cloning came down to religion the decision should regard all religious thought equally. Why should a Roman Catholic belief that cloning is evil be given more value than a Muslim belief that no limits should be placed on research because knowledge is bestowed on us by God? Overall, all religious criticism on the issue of cloning should be thrown out as religious opinions are far too diverse as to decipher that "religion" and "God" are against human cloning.
Another knock against cloning is that it will be misused if certain individuals get hold of it. For many people, the concept of cloning brings about the thought of Eugenics, the selection of beneficial inherited characteristics, and Adolf Hitler's superior Aryan race. The problem with this is that all things have the potential to be misused. What if a terrorist got hold of an atomic bomb? All this criticism goes back to "What if" statements and cannot be justified as a guaranteed consequence of cloning. Even though it has the potential to be misused, the rewards of cloning far outweigh the risks. By cloning human organs, cloning can stop both liver and kidney failures. Cloning can also stop cancer by switching on and off certain cells in the human body and stop other illnesses such as cystic fibrosis, Down's syndrome, and Tay-Sachs Disease. Cloning is leading to breakthroughs with stem cells and can even reverse heart attacks. In the future, cloning may be able to reverse the aging process. In the end, the rewards of cloning far outweigh its possible risks.
One final argument against cloning is that it is immoral. This train of thought is usually connected with fictitious ideas of engineering humans and factories of spare human parts. Fantasies like this are common between critics of cloning, including President George Bush, who stated that "Our children are gifts to be loved and protected, not products to be designed and manufactured. Allowing cloning would be taking a significant step toward a society in which human beings are grown for spare body parts, and children are engineered to custom specifications; and that's not acceptable." Others, including the Vatican, claim that cloning is "grotesque" and should be stopped immediately. Undoubtedly, cloning can get out of hand but this can be prevented by passing laws limiting cloning from turning society into the fictitious one embedded in the minds of the critics. Clones could also be given civil rights. Although cloning may seem immoral and "wrong" now, it has the ability to further progress human growth in the right direction. The human race is built on altering nature and society, concepts which has brought man to its present point. The argument that scientific breakthroughs are immoral will result in man being stuck in its present situation, never advancing.
Overall, cloning is a bold new scientific discovery which needs much experimenting on in order to fully understand its abilities. However, cloning comes with much consequences and critique, including the thought that cloning is unethical, anti-religious, highly dangerous, and immoral. Although, some of this is true, the human race needs to take risks in order to advance as cloning has some amazing abilities. It can allow infertile couples to have their own children, cure cancer, stop aging, and much, much more. Cloning is a reality in our world and can aid the human race significantly. Give it the chance it deserves.
Published by dao billy
Student View profile
- Human CloningThis article takes a look at how human cloning can be done. It also looks at both sides of the argument of is it good or bad? Is it helpful or hurtful? It offers up information so you can choose what you think of h...
- The Age of Human CloningPresident Obama released the scientific community to explore new possibilities in the field of Human Cloning; Some results are in but what's the verdict?
- Reproductive Human Cloning - The DebateThis debate paper was written for an interdisciplinary science course. It delves deeper into the ethical issues surrounding cloning.
- Human Reproductive CloningThis paper examines the arguments and rationale for and against human reproductive cloning.
- Warcraft III Guide - How to Properly Use the Human RaceI've recently gotten extremely powerful with the human race - A race which most people tend to avoid because they assume they're not good!
- The Pros and Cons of Embryonic Cloning
- Human Cloning
- Human Cloning - Who Will Benefit?
- Human Cloning and Genetic Engineering: Ethical?
- The Inevitable Question of Human Cloning
- Should Human Cloning Be Banned?
- The Ongoing Debate on Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning..
