Hunting Wild Game: A Necessity, Not a Sport

Jamie K. Wilson
When I was a little girl, I remember crying because my daddy had let my uncle hunt the deer back on our farm. I had enjoyed my long walks back along the creek, through the trees, and the occasional surprise as a deer, startled, leapt through the bushes right next to me, across the creek or over a fence, and away, its delicate long legs flying and nostrils flaring with alarm, the flash of a white tail the last I saw of it.

I couldn't bear to think of one turned into venison chili, which my uncle was known for, or one lying bleeding and dead on the ground.

But my dad explained it to me. Remember, he asked, when our dogs were sick - or our chickens? If the vet couldn't kill them, they suffered and died. Deer, when allowed to breed unchecked, would sicken and starve in the winter. They'd eat the bark off trees, causing them to die. Or they'd come too close to our dogs, and the dogs would do Nature's work for it.

We had killed off all the coyote and wolves and bears and mountain lions in our area, or driven them out. The deer didn't have any natural check on its breeding. Hunting, he said, was the only way to keep the population healthy.

Well, I didn't think it was the ONLY way. There was birth control, or relocation, or zoos. But as I grew older, I understood that hunting was the least expensive and most effective means to keep the population under control. And if Bambi's father (female deer were usually off-limits) died, at least we knew my uncle and other hunters out there would make genuine use of the body, not just keep the head for its antlers as a lot of city hunters did.

There is another issue, though, a more pragmatic and less emotional one than the spectre of animals starving. Our herd animals compete with deer and other wild creatures for food and other resources. And deer love young new crops of food - which means that when the deer break into the cornfield and nibble away all the fresh shoots, they are directly competing with humans for food and resources.

A lot of people believe that animals should be allowed to do this, that we took their land and they have the right to retaliate. I am not one of those people. The reality is that if deer were allowed to reproduce unchecked, they would overrun much of our farmland. Our cattle would die, as would many of our trees (deer love to nibble bark in the winter), and if you could still find food, it would cost more than many can afford.

Like it or not, hunting provides a cheap form of population control for deer and other creatures with no nonhuman population checks other than starvation and disease. There are other methods - sterilization, for example - but none as efficient or as natural as hunting.

Published by Jamie K. Wilson

Jamie K. Wilson is the wife of a US sailor and mother of two teen boys, one Marine, and two beautiful baby girls. The family hails from Louisville, Kentucky originally.  View profile

  • Hunting keeps populations down, even when predators have been eliminated.
  • Good hunters eat their game, and there is little waste.
  • Without hunters, many animals would undergo the crueler and longer death of starvation.

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jamie K. Wilson4/29/2010

    Kimiko, did you even bother to read the article? And where do you think food from the supermarket comes from -- trees? People eat meat. You may loathe it if you like, but it's still a fact.

  • hunting is murder9/14/2008

    hunting isn't a sport....it isn't necessary....mankind staying the hell out of the way is necessary

  • hunting is good4/14/2008

    yes we can use birth control but how do we know which deer will breed with others and really who would want that job?

  • Melanie Schwear6/22/2007

    Responsibly hunting makes sense. And I have to say that cleanly killing a deer that had a long life in the wild and utilizing ever part of it is MUCH more humane than what our beef cattle etc. go through in their lives and deaths.

  • ALBAN MEHLING6/20/2007

    My view point is that hunting isn't any different than raisin' hogs or steer fer meat.

  • Jamie K. Wilson6/20/2007

    Don't get me wrong - I hate hunting and could not do it. But -- I prefer it to letting the poor creatures starve or die in traps.

  • Carol Gilbert6/20/2007

    I think I liked your earlier view more.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.