How dare he take military action without congressional consent! We can't afford it! We don't even know who the rebels are!
Of course if Obama hadn't interceded, especially after Arab League requests and there was a massacre in Benghazi, this is what we'd be hearing: Lack of leadership! He vacillated while thousands died! Couldn't handle the 3 AM phone call!
Two weeks ago Newt "look at me! look at me!" Gingrich and other Grand Old Panderers were savaging Obama for dithering. Now that he's acted, it's an abomination! Even Sen. Lindsey Graham R-S.C. expressed little patience with fellow Republicans' hypocrisy.
Where to start. Congressional consent. Do Republicans really want to go there? Case in point, Ronald Reagan's and George H. W. Bush's various 1980s exploits in Nicaragua -- you do recall Iran-contra -- Grenada and Panama without so much as a howdy-do to congress. Oh, yeah and Libya? Reagan bombed it 25 years ago with neither congressional authorization nor UN or Arab League approval.
Ah, the cost. These are the same guys who allowed George W. Bush to run two full tilt boogey wars on credit cards, which along with his disastrous tax cuts for the wealthy, dropped a $1.2 trillion deficit in Obama's lap on his first day in office. And they have the audacity to carp about spending a measly billion dollars to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and possibly lead to Qaddifi's overthrow. Astounding!
Finally, who are the rebels? True, it isn't clear who they are and would be a good question by Republicans if it were asked for clarification and not just as a political zinger. It also might carry more clout if it weren't for their sorry history on the subject.
Not only didn't the Bush administration know the players in Iraq in 2003 -- at the time several senior officials couldn't distinguish between Sunnis and Shias -- they also didn't know anything about RÄfid Ahmad AlwÄn. He became the notorious "Curveball" upon whose totally bogus testimony about Saddam's WMD Bush invaded Iraq. Incredibly, no senior American intelligence officer had ever bothered to speak with Curveball.
I don't know if it makes sense interceding in Libya. Above my pay grade. But if we were going to do it, Obama played it pretty well. It has limited, and more importantly, achievable objectives and multinational support; hence Libya and not Syria or Iran. Obama lined up all the ducks, provided our unique capabilities to our allies who do consider Libya of vital interest and now we've backed out of our leadership role just as he said he would.
Tell me you ain't buying this Republican bag of hooey.
Published by H. Martin Moore
Random musings and targeted rants by TampaBayWriter. Follow Moore's weekly columns at http://suncoastpasco.tbo.com/content/ list/news/opinion/ Click on "Affiliations" below. View profile
- Why Arab Democracy is Good for AmericaWe are currently witnessing an unprecedented shift in Arab politics that has caught the whole world, even the Egyptians themselves by surprise.The uprising and it's epi-center Tahrir Square.
- Republican Hypocrisy on Moral ValuesThis editorial is about how the Republicans have claimed how religious they are and then you find out that they actually are not the religious moral party you thought they were and people like Mark Foley, David Vitter...
- The Effects of the Arab Israeli Conflict on Modern Israeli and Palestinian Governm...This paper analyzes the effects that the Arab Israeli conflict has had on the government structures, economies, and arts of both Israelis and Palestinians and evaluates the effects from both perspectives.
Arab League's "Death Star" and the Awesome Power of YouTube.comFrom YouTube to Yahoo videos, this clip is all over the dangerous faux-world that we call the internet.- The Arab Israeli Conflict and Components: Ceaseless Violence in a Sacred LandIn this paper I explain the events before and after the establishment of Israel as a state I propose a realistic method of managing the conflict between Israel andits enemies based on a review of pertinent literature.
- Obama Accuses Romney of Hypocrisy, Tackles War in Iraq
- America's Shameless Hypocrisy
- American Racism and Hypocrisy
- Democracy Also Rans
- The Last Jews of Libya Short Film Review
- Milan Stock Exchange Affected by Unrest in Libya
- Republican Hypocrisy




3 Comments
Post a CommentNot buying it. I don't even browse there.
Interfering in Libya seems a smart move - pragmatically it will garner a lot of international goodwill as there seems to be unanimous agreement on establishing peacekeeping military intervention. Then there's the matter of oil, which is an ever present political motivator.
However, from a purely humanistic point of view, acting on this issue seems prudent as well as it has so far done much to prevent genocide and mass slaughter.
In my country, Denmark, it was the first conflict for more than a hundred years where complete political support for joining military could be found from every single party in parliament.
So, I suppose, I'm not buying that Republican bag of hooey!
P.S. The reason I found your blog and am now reading every update is due to your comment on a book-review site: http://myfavouritebooks (.) blogspot (.) com (/) 2009/05/atlantis-code-by-charles-brokaw.html. I am happy to finally find someone who agrees with me on that steaming pile of manure of a boo
I ain't buying this Republican bag of hooey!