Important Differences in True Blood Season One and Dead Until Dark
Book Vs. TV Show - Our Sookie Stackhouse Hasn't Changed, but the Vampires of Bon Temps Have!
True Blood has already garnered Sookie Stackhouse actress Anna Paquin a Golden Globe for portraying our Southern telepath with perfection. Season one of True Blood is based off of book one of the series, Dead Until Dark. While much of season one remains true to the book, people who are just now reading the books may find Bon Temps a bit changed.
Sookie is portrayed accurately in True Blood , much of her personality coincides with Dead Until Dark. However, the season finale doesn't coincide with Dead Until Dark at all. One important thing to point out is that Bill Compton , nor any man, has risked their life for Sookie in Dead Until Dark. We see in the season finale of True Blood that Bill risks his life and melts his face, in an effort to save Sookie. The thing with our group of vampires is that they put themselves, and their race first. The directors of True Blood portrayed Bill as a vampire who would put himself second, and Sookie first. I hold a great reservation with this change , because much of the next six books of the Southern Vampire Series is about this very issue. Why does Sookie continue to risk her life for these Vampiric men , when they obviously will not risk their lives for her? They spend six books exploring the vampire's love for this woman and how its so unheard of to put a human before themselves, and how it affects everything that they do.
Throughout Dead Until Dark Sookie is a woman who has no choice but to defend and take care of herself. She is the hero to those that should be her heroes. True Blood gave Bill Compton, her fanged boyfriend, way more credit than he was due in her protection. This change may have been based on the need for female fans of the show to connect and form a relationship with his character.
Sookie has no family but for her brother Jason. Much of Jason's character is completely accurate, until you get to the part about his being released from jail by the Temple of the Sun and attending that church. In the book he is far too involved with other things going on in his life, and he never has any interaction with members of the Sun.
Because our heroine has no family , and her brother is quite preoccupied with women, working and finding ways to weasel out of jail, she finds herself battling Bon Temp's murderer by herself . True Blood depicted Sookie battling Renee with some help of Bill and Sam. In Dead Until Dark , Sookie faces her murder alone, much as she does every other thing in her life, and comes out pretty battered. Dead Until Dark actually ends with Eric Northman checking on Sookie while she is hospitalized. The book makes it clear that Sookie was beaten and nearly killed, not just laid up on the couch resting. Arlene's tearful reunion is accurate , but the reunion with Bill is not. Sookie is more intrigued that Eric Northman of all people, sends her flowers and is floating out side of her room to check on her at the hospital. Eric is no where to be seen at the end of True Blood's season finale.
Living Dead in Dallas is book two of the Southern Vampire Series and is what season two of True Blood will be based off. Already with the finale of season one, we know that here strategic differences. In Living Dead in Dallas it isn't until the very end that we learn the bulk about the Temple of the Sun. Not only that, Jason never has anything to do with the organization as he stays clear of any vamps in the series of books. He isn't fond of them , but holds no hatred for them. Most of what he feels is fueled by fear and not understanding how they work. Jason will have a different role in season two of True Blood than he did in the book, and I believe this could be a game changer for the series all together. HBO bought the rights to base the show off of the series, however, they never said they were going to stick to the books. It is obvious that by the end of the season one, they knew the road they were taking would be creative diversion from the books.
I highly recommend reading Dead Until Dark while we wait for the summer release of season two for True Blood. While they are becoming horses of different colors, both are so unique in their own right that you can enjoy them separately. Don't let the differences between the two media's prevent you from enjoying the other, because with these changes we might be able to have our cake and eat it too!
Published by Sarah Wood
Sarah Wood is a mother of 2 and lives in the South. Writing has been a passion of her since she put together her first sentence " A bat in a lonely cave". Special interests for writing: vampire fiction, movi... View profile
- New Vampire Series on HBO - True Blood is for True RomanticsA descriptive overview of the new HBO series True Blood. Character descriptions and overall storyline.
HBO Series TrueBlood A Huge Hit Amongst Sookie Stackhouse FansCharlaine Harris fans are ecstatic to see the Sookie Stackhouse series come to life.- A Review of Charlaine Harris's Southern Vampire MysteriesThe HBO series True Blood is based upon the Harris series about vampires. In truth, I think the books are much, much better.
- True BloodTrue Blood is a fun, tasty bit of modern vampire lore to sink your teeth into.
The Real Appeal of HBO's True BloodAlan Ball's hit new True Blood series (HBO) has amassed a following of fans ready to sink their teeth into new episodes. What's the hook?
- Being Overly Conscious of True Love in Society
- Saving Cord Blood
- Dead Until Dark: A Different Kind of Vampire Story
- Three Vampire Book Series with 40's Flair, Chick Lit and Southern Charm
- The Ten Best Paranormal Fiction and Fantasy Writers
- My Favorite Paranormal Romance Novels
- True Blood: Best Vampire Show Since Buffy
- Jason never has interaction with the Temple of the Sun.
- Bill and Eric are not selfless people in Dead Until Dark.
- There are key differences between Dead Until Dark and True Blood




14 Comments
Post a CommentI read the books first, so I will always be disappointed that they strayed from the book. That being said, True Blood is one of the best book to TV adaptations ever. As much as they changed, I was impressed at how much they got right. Probably the worst change they made was the portrayal of the vampires. The also took away the most important character development which was Sookie dealing with Bills inhumanity. He is portrayed too angelic in True Blood. This takes away alot of the ground breaking originality of the books. Also, I would like to see less sex and drugs and more character development. But still one of the best tv series.
With season 3 over, we know that the HBO series has strayed afar from the books. The only regret I have is that Eric wasn't portrayed with humor as in the books. Do you think Bill is still prominent in the series because of his engagement and recent marriage in real life to Anna Paquin?
Nice little article you have here. I was SHOCKED to discover that Tara wasn't the same character in the books (Sookie's best friend, Sam's love on/off game, etc.); and Amy - a homicidal 'V' addict in the show, and a mere minor character in the book, only mentioned very briefly. I love the books but the show is fantastic. The differences are quite strange... but I s'pose they make sense when you think about it.
P.s. You misspelled 'Rene' on page 2. (:
I love this series. Both the books and the TV Show. I enjoy spotting the differences between the two. I think Anna was the perfect actress choice to portray Sookie.
I never read the books...I first found out about True Blood because Blockbuster was letting people rent the first episode for free last year. After that I fell in love =)
What about Tara? She's wasn't in the books at all, but was a prominent figure in the TV series.
I think the show is SOOOOOOO much better than the books. The books provide a blow-by-blow, wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am description of what happens, with little mention of how it affects Sookie. Like, she comes home and finds her grandma dead. Then, it's hardly ever mentioned again. No flashbacks, no struggle, no nothing. Just "Oh, Gram's dead? What a shame."
And what about the hulking character in the book, Bubba, that Bill assigns to watch after Sookie in his absence? He's not mentioned in the TV series.
I didn't care for the first book at all. I'm not entirely sure how it got published, much less how someone could get inspiration for a TV show from it, but thank goodness they did! I'm so obsessed with the TV show, it's ridiculous.
The books are so much better than the TV series simply because of the character development found throughout the books. The vampires' reactions to Sookie and to the human world are grossly misinterpreted by True Blood. I speak, of course, of Bill and Eric: there's simply too out of character. Bill is made into a savior, Eric into an uninterested villain. If I had not read the books, I would still probably not be very interested in the TV series because it seems so reliant on sensationalism and the lead characters behave too much like every other vampre-story cast. Just too much stereotyping and playing off of the adult rated Twilight-train elements.
Great article! I think you made some excellent points.
The series is different than the book so you have to take True Blood as a free staying story. For season 2 just ride the wave and enjoy it.
While I liked the HBO series okay, I thought the book series was much, much better. I really hated the changes the made on True Blood.
Well, Sookie managed to keep herself alive in the books without Bills help there at the the end, so really - it is what it is.