Innocent Victims?

Maybe Not Always so Innocent

Todd Matthews
It's more often thought that the unidentified persons in any UID database are victims. Most UID's are indeed victims of murder. But consider the possibility that the victim is not an innocent victim. Very possible that they are of the criminal element themselves.

Known fugitives of justice are not in missing persons databases for comparison to unidentified remains. That would not be justice to the true missing persons. But Law Enforcement Agencies might consider the alternate use of search-able databases like NamUs & Doe Network to seek out their fugitives among the unidentified deceased. A double value!

The NamUs database is very detailed. If LE know of the specific crown, filling or other dental detail they can search the records for cases that have the same single dental detail. So if I want to look for all male UID's that have a crown on the upper left bicuspid and a filling on the upper right bicuspid, a list of cases with those specific details would be generated for further review. That's why the dentals are important. They are vital in the final ID -- and can greatly enhance the search-ability for quick review of possible matches.

Too bad dental x-rays aren't a standard booking feature when someone is arrested.

Now in the standard news piece -- speaking as only a rep for other efforts -- I'd have to mind my tongue in regards to suggesting dental x-rays are taken of criminals arrested for violent crimes of any kind. But when there's time too look at things from a personal point of view -- one would understand why "I" feel it would have value.

But the result is the same, innocent or not, we must still try to help find a name for any victim. A crime was committed and a life lost in any event. A family suffers somewhere - and someone goes unpunished.

Published by Todd Matthews

Todd's calling to be a voice for missing and unidentified persons began when he solved the identity of the "Tent Girl" case, Barbara Hackman-Taylor, after a ten-year journey that ended in 1998.  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Sara Huizenga Lubbers, Peace4 the Missing10/13/2009

    This is such an impacting article and vital outlook. Who are we to play God and put some kind of ranked value on human life...that%27s not our job...we just need to value it...regardless...%0D%0A%0D%0APeace4 the Missing%0D%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fpeace4missing.ning.com

  • Maureen10/13/2009

    Not all UIDs are innocent victims nor are all the missing adults good people. But, they all do have families and friends who cared about them and those families and friends have a right to know what happened to their loved one.

    If the UID was a criminal who perpetrated crimes on others then their victims have the right to know this person can no longer cause harm. For the missing adult that is a criminal then their victims have the right to seek and find this person and get justice.

    There should be standards that ALL law enforcement has to follow when searching for anyone be they criminal or be they good people who are missing. Searching and/or reporting to the same database should be mandatory. We now have a wonderful tool in NamUs but when reporting to it is not mandatory it will never reach its full potential.

    It's pretty sad when it's easier to find a lost pet and determine its name, doctor and owner via a chip than it is to give a name to an UID human.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.