Internet Censorship: Is Government Control Just a Bill Away?

Sen. Joe Lieberman Proposes Law that Would Allow Federal Govt. To Take Control of Internet

L.L. Woodard
Senator Joe Lieberman, Independent senator from Connecticut, has proposed legislation that would allow the federal government to take over the internet during times of "crisis." This would be done through a proposed new agency, the National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC), to be part of Homeland Security.

Lieberman is chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee. He co-authored the bill with Senator Susan Collins, Republican senator from Maine, and ranking Republican on the Homeland Security Committee.

Lieberman cites threats to national security through internet pipelines as his rationale for the need for such legislation. In a time of national crisis, the federal government would have the authority to seize or even switch off Internet capabilities nationwide.

The bill, called the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act (PCNAA), would give a wide berth of oversight and control to the NCCC, giving it authority over all internet service providers, software companies and search engines--or any company that "relies on" the internet or any other part of the U.S. "information infrastructure" to their list" (The Week).

In the event of a presidential declaration of national emergency, companies under the authority of the NCCC could be given any variety of instructions to perform. The companies would need to comply immediately or face monetary penalties.

Spokeswoman for the Homeland Security Committee, Leslie Phillips, made statements assuring that the legislation was not aimed at governmental control of private web services or specific websites, but only to that which could threaten national security if breached.

Wayne Crews, vice president of the free-enterprise think-tank company Competitive Enterprise Institute, expressed concern with the broad wording in the current proposed legislation, giving the federal government too much latitude for interpretation. Crews is concerned that if passed, the PCNAA could limit freedom of speech via the internet.

Sources: The Week
The Daily Beast

Published by L.L. Woodard

Freelance writer/editor and freelance observer of life. Three decades of nursing experience in long-term care, from development of team care planning to hands-on patient care.  View profile

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Kristen Wilkerson8/24/2010

    This is a very important concept.

  • Patricia Sicilia6/26/2010

    Not sure what to think of this. It would have to be a pretty big emergency to justify this.

  • Charlotte Kuchinsky6/24/2010

    I heard last night that it would be left within the president's power to shut it down if he so choose. Anyone else hear that or is it just a rumor?

  • Linda M. McCloud6/23/2010

    I wonder if Memmay is right and they are all ready doing this and we just don't know it.

  • R. Elizabeth C. Kitchen6/18/2010

    Absolutely amazing topic and article. You present a great argument. To me it seems every year Americans lose just a little more freedom.

  • Memmay Moore6/18/2010

    I am sure they already do this.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.