Internet Radio Receives Death Blow from Las Vegas Judge

Goth Diva
According to the AP, In Las Vegas today a judge dealt what could be the death blow for small Internet radio broadcasters and non profits like NPR which broadcast music and a good portion of their programming on the Internet. A panel of copyright judges refused to consider requests to reconsider a ruling that hiked the royalties they must pay to record companies and artists, effectively tripling the costs for small businesses, independent broadcasters and others who specialize in providing free Internet radio streams.

A group of public and private Internet broadcasters, including radio stations, small startup companies, and National Public Radio had objected to the new royalties set March 2, saying they would force a drastic cutback in services that are now enjoyed by some 50 million people. Most consumers don't pay for Internet radio, broadcasters pay royalty and licensing fees out of their own pockets and recoup expenses through advertising or other merchandise rather than from a paying listening audience.

In today's ruling, the Copyright Royalty Board judges denied all motions for rehearing and also refused to postpone a May 15 deadline by which the new royalties will have to be collected.

However, they will allow the Webcasters to calculate fees by average listening hours, as they have been, as opposed to the new system where broadcasters will be charged a royalty each time every song is heard by an online listener. They will be allowed to continue calculating fees the old way until next year and will not be charged retro-actively for last year. After that, the new per-song, per-listener fee structure goes into effect.

Most Webcasters say the sharply higher royalty fees will put them out of business. Discussion about the ruling dominated a one-day meeting of Internet radio broadcasters being held in Las Vegas alongside the annual conference of the National Association of Broadcasters, a group representing local radio and TV stations.

N. Mark Lam, the CEO of Live365 Inc., a privately held company that aggregates audio streams from thousands of radio stations and other small Webcasters, said that under the new royalty rules, "there is no industry." Live365 is one of the biggest sources for Webcasters who pay a monthly fee to Live365 to cover the licensing and royalty obligations and stream their audio content through the Live365 site.

Lam, who joined the venture capital-backed company about two years ago, said Live365 just barely broke even last year and had about 4.5 million unique listeners every month.

David Oxenford, the lawyer representing a group of Webcasters who are fighting the new restrictions, said the next step is likely an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, but he noted that process could take at least a year. Meanwhile, he said, the prospects of successfully getting a court to block the decision of the royalty board judges is slim.

Smaller broadcasters who don't have lobbyists or the relationships with government that bigger broadcasters like Yahoo and AOL have will just be out luck. Many will be put out of business within a few months, reducing the number of Internet radio stations. The legal wrangling is the latest battle between the music industry, whose dropping sales have caused record companies to close ranks and fight for every dime they can make and independent artists and DJ s who have harnessed the power of the Internet to go around the traditional music company protocols to distribute their music.

  • The new ruling will effect thousands of independent Webcasters.
  • Only major sites like Yahoo and AOL will be able to afford the new fees.

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • mystic summer5/13/2007

    That's unfair. Glad i don't listen to music on the internet.

  • JMR4/24/2007

    This sucks. I really like live365.

  • Ninigurl4/23/2007

    Damn, another slap to my city for something this stupid hurts. When will the greed stop! Great article!

  • Mommy2Lots4/23/2007

    That's crazy. Do they actually think people will pay to listen to the radio when it's always been free before? Great article. :)

  • Shelly E4/23/2007

    WOW - I had no idea about any of this. This is ridiculous!! Thanks for sharing this info.

  • TheDeconstructionist4/20/2007

    The greed of the record companies and recording industry is unbelievable. I was a broadcast radio DJ for many years, and even though I got out I know many, many radio and club DJs who moved to the Internet and use Shoutcast and Live365 to do shows and they're all reeling from this. Like most webcasters, they don't do it for money, they do it for love of music. It will be terrible if this can't be stopped and they go under.

  • Jacques Boulerice4/19/2007

    As M.S. stated, I was broadcasting on Live365 for three years (but had to go on hiatus because of a non-station related financial problem), and with the royalty rate that the CRB/RIAA want to assess (retroactively) for 2006, it could cost small broadcasters like me about $185,000 for 2006, and double that for 2007. If these idiots drive Internet radio off the air with their absurd charges, where will they get their royalties from? "Big Time" radio stations, because of a "grandfather clause" deal cut years ago, DO NOT have to pay royalties to play music. Many Web station owners say they will move their operations to Canada to escape these unfair rates.

  • M.S.Medina4/18/2007

    My husband does an internet show and this is killing him. How absurd. Maybe we will have to start giving car manufacturers more money each year for driving their old car model because they created it? When will the insanity stop? Good article.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.