The story says, "Putin, who many diplomats, analysts, and Russian citizens believe is still Russia's paramount leader despite stepping down as president last year, was speaking after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Moscow for two days of talks. 'There is no need to frighten the Iranians,' Putin told reporters in Beijing after a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. 'We need to look for a compromise. If a compromise is not found, and the discussions end in a fiasco, then we will see.'"
How definitive is that? We will see? Could he have been any more vague? The truth is that Russia has too much money invested in Iran's nuclear program to allow meaningful sanctions that would impact Moscow's bottom line. It is the Russians and the Chinese who have thus far blocked any real sanctions against Iran that might actually bring the Iranians to the bargaining table.
Putin said, "And if now, before making any steps (towards holding talks) we start announcing some sanctions, then we won't be creating favourable conditions for them (talks) to end positively. This is why it is premature to talk about this now."
Newsflash: talks without the threat of serious sanctions are meaningless. There's no prospect for punitive action if the talks go south. Western nations have tried the carrots approach, with no success. It's time to switch from carrots to sticks.
The story continues, "Clinton failed to secure any specific assurances from Russia on Iran during her visit, leaving her open to criticism at home that she had not received anything from Moscow after earlier U.S. concessions on missile defence. Iranian, Russian, French, U.S. and U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency officials will meet in Vienna on Oct. 19 to discuss how to implement a plan agreed in principle at talks in Geneva for low-grade Iranian uranium to be enriched overseas to a purity suitable for nuclear reactors but not weapons. The Geneva talks on Oct. 1 also produced Iranian agreement for international inspectors to visit a second enrichment plant now under construction near Qom. Apparent Iranian concession reduced pressure for a widening of economic sanctions some analysts said could be extended to the oil and gas industry."
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-43160620091014
Published by Greg Reeson
I am a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal and a The Veteran's Voice. I also regularly contribute to GOPUSA and The Land of the Free. View profile
- Time to Drop Sanctions Against CubaSanctions have historically been ineffective and usually hurt the very people they are meant to help. The United States should pursue other methods of regime change in Cuba and lift the sanctions that are only hurting...
- Israel Hints at Possible Iran StrikeIsraeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told a parliamentary panel that no options were off the table in dealing with Iran.
- Iran: No Talks Unless US Leaves Middle EastIran sets preconditions for negotiations with the United States.
- Iran: A Preemptive Strike on Israel?Haaretz reported that some Iranian officials have recommended a preemptive strike against Israel.
- Will Iran Cooperate with the World?With sanctions in place and calls from world leaders, will Iran cooperate?
- Iran - History
- Why Israel Dares Not and U.S Will Not Strike Iran
- Russian Government Seizes Books on Putin
- United Nations Security Council Imposes New Sanctions on Iran
- U.N. Sanctions Against North Korea Are Still Absolutely Necessary
- Iran Avoids Tougher UN Sanctions
- Iran and the U.N




1 Comments
Post a CommentRussia warned? I guess we should be shaking in our shoes.