Positive vs. Negative Reactions
There will always be both positive and negative factors when following a business trend such as affirmative action. The most important factor to focus on is whether the positive reactions outweigh the negative reactions. Affirmative action is a difficult and complex procedure to begin implementing and I believe it is important as company executives to review both the pros and cons before taking action.
Positive Reactions
A company will benefit from creating and implementing an affirmative action plan by allowing a more diverse group of people to be employed such as disabled individuals and society's minorities. You will be giving minorities that are disadvantaged a helping hand in the workforce, breaks the typical stereotypes, and draws people to our company that may not have before. People suffering with mental or physical disabilities that have adequate qualifications which meet our hiring expectations will bring a much needed diverse network to our company. You will also be able to connect with other businesses and their partners because of this newly created network.
Negative Reactions
Groups and individuals may argue affirmative action leads to even more discrimination in the workplace than before. A company can prevent outsiders from opposing our plan by focusing on hiring a more diverse group of people based on their merit rather than just for their race, gender, and/or disability. Some companies may lower their standards in the hiring process, but we should not. Minorities may feel as if we are "doing them a favor" or being condescending by enforcing affirmative action, but we should not even address their minority status during the interview and hiring process.
Affirmative Action
Efforts of affirmative action should be met with specific, dependable, and realistic factors. The strategy should have set guidelines that all management abides by, is a dependable method which we are able to utilize without question, and be realistic. You should be able to measure our success after implementing the plan and tweak it if necessary.
Recommendations
Would it really be too troublesome to accommodate a disabled individual? The Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which was amended in 1974, is very similar to The Americans with Disabilities Act. The act states we are prohibited from "discriminating against disabled individuals in any program or activity." (2007, Bohlander & Snell). Most companies already have elevators, ramps, wheelchair accessible bathrooms, rails, brail signs, and much more. You should look at applicants with disabilities and not even consider hiring a more able-bodied individual if the disabled person is qualified for a position. The same goes for people of all ages, race, gender, and ethnicity. Their calendar age, anatomy, beliefs, or skin color should not be taken into consideration when we hire them. If they are qualified for the job and we can afford to hire them, why aren't we? Yes, it would be harder to assign certain tasks to someone who is in a wheelchair because they will be physically limited, but they may do a much better job than someone who can walk normally. You need to be fair and realize everyone qualified and experienced for a position is equal. You cannot discriminate, by law, but also because it will hurt a company.
Conclusion
One thing I want to leave you with is it truly does not matter who is doing the job, but how the job is done. Implementing affirmative action can be a very positive and beneficial business plan, but I would like to think it is not absolutely necessary. You want all employees to feel equal and as if they were hired based on their merit, not because you are following an affirmative action plan. You should be able to hire individuals that will be assets to our company that come from all different parts of the World to build a stronger network base without having to enforce affirmative action.
References
Bohlander & Snell. (2007). Equal Employment Opportunity and Human Resources Management. Managing Human Resources. Thomson South-Western. Chapter 3, 14th Edition. Retrieved July 1, 2007 from Course Materials.
Published by mehpixielor
I'm Lauren. View profile
- Affirmative Action: More Harm Than Good?Affirmative Action is a controversial measure that some people believe creates injustices in its pursuit to correct them. I believe that Affirmative Action is a flawed system to correct an unfortunate past, but is the...
Is Affirmative Action Still a Good Idea in This Era?An online site posed the question of affirmative action as being reverse discrimination. That's a simple way to look at it, but in effect, yes.- Affirmative Action: A One Sided Argument!Every story has two sides as is with the case of affirmative action. Many often see one side of the coin and never flip it over to reveal the other side. So it goes unsaid and unnoticed by the masses that many are hur...
- The Glass Ceiling for Women Working in the Information Technology FieldWomen tend to hold a small fraction of upper level positions compared to men in the IT field. However, companies are gradually hiring women in upper level positions, using merit rather than affirmative action for suc...
- Affirmative Action Promotes DiscriminationAffirmative action, intended to do away with disparity and inequality, is now hotly contested the world over.
- Quotas: Weapon or Remedy. Affirmative Action and Exclusionary Quotas
- Affirmative Action - Civil Rights Movement
- Affirmative Action: Why and for Whom?
- Affirmative Action as a Staple of Society
- Affirmative Action: Why It is Necessary in America
- Affirmative Action is 40 Years Old Now What?
- Affirmative Action



