Now I have to be honest and admit that I am a gamer at heart. Ive been playing games since Nintendo first game out, and have owned numerous amounts of systems and games since I could afford to buy them. But I have never been the gamer that likes the war simulators. I prefer my games to be a little less realistic, after all that, to me, is the point of games. Why would you want to escape life for a few hours by playing a game that simulates life, when you can escape into a far away world and use magic, or tame dragons? But the shocking trend of FPS, or first person shooters, is on the rise.
Reading magazines such as Game Informer, I find myself skipping a huge chunk of the magazine because several pages, both front and back, are talking about the latest and greatest shoot 'em ups. Games raging from World War reenactments to Gears of War all involve strapping on the latest piece of death dealing devices and pulverizing your enemy until they have more holes than should be considered healthy. But lets take a look at just what these games involve, just to be fair.
A numerous amount of the games that are currently for sale involve guiding a character through a war. Wars such as World War 1 or 2, or even the current Iraq War are being digitized and made for play by game lovers world wide. But in a society that deals with death on a daily basis, does this obvious attraction to dealing digital death involve a concern for the people playing them? Should parents, or even friends, be concerned when the gamer in question starts stuffing bombs into their enemies to watch the blood and gore like a sick firework? Should the eyebrows raise in confusion or even worry when the games allow people to strap on a chainsaw and dismember an opposing officer piece by piece? Its my opinion that there is something wrong.
Perhaps its simply that the game companies have found a proverbial cash cow and intend to milk it for all its worth, or perhaps its that Americans find Death easier to deal with, if they are the ones dealing with it. It makes financial sense that if the games make millions of dollars for the game companies, than sequels and other branches of the same type of game will sell soon after. But are we just talking about making a lot of money? Should allowing such violence, even if its rated by the ESRB, to be sold and mainstreamed be just about money? It does beg the question as to why we are so comfortable with death.
Is peace in our world possible when in digital lands we are napalming villagers and gunning down men? I doubt it. And am I calling for a massive revolt against all video games? Certainly not. I'm merely proposing that people question why violence and death sell so well.
Published by Chris Murk
I'm just an aspiring writer from a little town in Maryland. Ive got a lot of opinions and a lot of inspiration, so you can expect to see my writings in the world. View profile
- Violence in Media and Society In a world where media is such a big factor of our lives. We would have to be blind not to notice the increase in violence. What does this say about our society?
- Chaotic: Globalization, the Media and American Popular Culture This paper looks at articles from Lynn Hirschberg, Marilyn Manson, John Storey, and Robert Bork and questions the ramification of exporting American popular culture as well as popular cultures role in forming the Amer...
-
The 2008 Summer Olympic Games in China
Should being selected to host the 2008 Summer Olympic Games honor China?
- The United States in the Korean War: What Every American Should Know June 25th, 1950. Before dawn, forces of North Korea attacked to the south, aiming to re-unify the peninsula under communist dictator Kim Il Sung. Within two days, American forces were beginning to fight the invasion...
- Play Video Games Check out these video games that focus on resolving social and other real-world problems.
- The Best Video Games for Young Kids
- What Children Can Learn from Playing Video Games
- The Perfect Job: Video Games Tester
- How Video Games Imbed and Convey Sexual Messages
- Parents Can Track Violent Video Games Children Might Be Playing
- The Next Generation of Video Games
- Why Are Video Games Becoming More Violent?
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
9 Comments
Post a CommentKids, people, soldiers need to have a better understanding of "when to fight".
I suppose my views sound somewhat radical, but I think we should be teaching our children to like stories with some fantasy, science fiction and relationships to nature/supernature, than to violence for the sake of violence, or sex for the sake of sex. Violence is a bad thing when it is denatured from the context in which violence regularly occurs, much like in a video game such as Gears of War, Halo, etc.
Kids, start playing good games like Pokemon, Super Mario, etc. and quit pandering to the forces of violence.
blow booty
heyy.!
continued -
there are other ways to teach the younger generations about the horrors of war...and in my opinion..just changing to fluffy sort of games is not going to do the trick..thats what schools and parents try to do to kids during childhood anyway...so now the child grows up and when he realizes what the world is really about ...he is all disillusioned and sad....so why not expose them to the truth from the very beginning instead of telling them the world is a happy,rosey place.....we under estimate childrens wisdom and understanding...they can teach us a few things about getting along and living harmoniously....
cont-
there are other ways to teach the younger generations about the horrors of war...and in my opinion..just changing to fluffy sort of games is not going to do the trick..thats what schools and parents try to do to kids during childhood anyway...so now the child grows up and when he realizes what the world is really about ...he is all disillusioned and sad....so why not expose them to the truth from the very beginning instead of telling them the world is a happy,rosey place.....we under estimate childrens wisdom and understanding...they can teach us a few things about getting along and living harmoniously....
i think that people can and should be mature enough in their thinking to differenciate between the two...games can be fun...to do things that you cant in reality..like be a hero or fly a ww2 plane...there are other aspects of these games that are attractive...not only the killing...i like to play first person shooters or go paintball gun shooting with friends...but that does not mean that i like violence or condone killing and war...sometimes its just fun to aim and hit a target...or throw a stone at a target or something like that...if people cannot differenciate then something is wrong....some of these games also help to make people aware of the dangers of war...just because mario kills a bug while looking cute..does not change the fact that he is killing....
but i agree with you that the governments and countrys on a whole are obsessed with boundaries and war and ownership and possession and greed etc...
war is a truth..and to pretend it does not exist is also stupidity...
there
oamtka
In today's society, we have become extremely de-sensitized. There is a lack of regard for others that is so pervasive, it goes unnoticed. Moreover, in a capitalist country such as USA, profit is more important than humanism.
I am a gamer at heart to but all that dragon and fairy tale stuff is more for 5 year olds thats why. You dont expect adults to line up to see a disney movie