Is Atheism the Next Rebellious Trend?

Todd Newton
Theism is a belief in a higher power, or to have a theory of a higher power. Atheism is the [sometimes militant] belief that nothing greater than us exists. People blame atheism on science (or science on atheism) and atheists blame religion for every cruel or unfair act ever perpetrated by a mass of people. But is atheism just a knee-jerk reaction?

According to my calculations, the surge of atheism didn't exist until the 20th century. In a time of technology and all kinds of societal confusion, people started to misunderstand and mistreat orthodox beliefs. It's interesting that new "sects" or "denominations" of Christianity are forming even today. To further augment the now public sufferings of kids being bullied and ostracized, there was religious disquiet.

I believe atheism is a natural progression of thought due to the pendulum-swing effect of human society. You see this same kind of pattern develop everywhere. Take Christmas, for example.

A few years ago, people complained that they weren't Christians so they didn't want to be wished a Merry Christmas or anything of the sort. The knee-jerk reaction of society was called "political correctness," and has controlled the holiday season ever since. Just this year, we're seeing the pendulum beginning to swing in the other direction. People have gotten sick of saying "Happy Holidays" but still celebrating Christmas.

I think American society as a whole sits somewhere between militant atheism and devout Christianity but because we live in a free country people are allowed to fall anywhere in the spectrum. But is it simply "hip" to be an atheist?

I don't mean to discount the homosexual lifestyle in any way but I think "coming out" has become the same kind of trend. It's a slap in the face to parents who have mistreated you, much the same was as listening to Marilyn Manson used to be. It's a way to show your parents, "Look at me, Mom & Dad! No matter how hard you tried, I still turned out different than how you wanted!" I bring this up because I believe there's a graceful way to tell you're parents that you're homosexual and there's a way to really rub their faces in it.

Atheism is a great way to "rub their faces in it," to me. I don't think that belief is proof of something, nor do I believe that disbelief is disproof of something. I think telling someone that you're an atheist is a great way to shock people and a very quick way to set yourself apart from the crowd, but probably not for very much longer. I think, just like with any group of people (particularly religion/anti-religion); there are people in it just for show.

Try to convince me that all atheists are intelligent people who have thought the entire concept through from end to end. I'd never even ask you to convince me that all Christians have done the opposite! And that's the problem.

Atheism is a rebellious attitude, much like picking up smoking cigarettes as a teenager. The vast majority of adults, both scientists and non-scientists, have reached a general consensus that smoking cigarettes is bad for the human body. But, somehow, new smokers are created every day, even with all of the propaganda supporting the consensus. Why has smoking continued even after being shown to cause painful death?

Because smokers have the same attitude as atheists. They want to give the big "thumbs up" to everyone else. They'll smoke because they can do whatever they want and you can't tell them what to do! They'll smoke right outside the door, with no regard for rules or laws, because they don't care that they're killing themselves and they want you to know it.

There's not one benefit that I can think of to smoking cigarettes. In fact, there are numerous practical examples not to smoke, money being one of them. Likewise, I can't surmise any benefits to atheism. Whether I, personally, believe in God or not doesn't get me to work any faster. It won't get me the big house and the fancy car. I do believe God exists but if he does, he exists whether I believe in him or not. Unfortunately we know from seeing the smokers that weighing of benefits and consequences rarely motivate our decisions.

Even being a Christian I can admit that just because you gain in numbers it does not lend any credence to your argument (or lack thereof). I think atheism is a religious trend brought on by societal pendulum-swing, whether or not there's any real truth to it at all. It's unfortunate that most atheists are so militant about what they believe and classify all Christians as the same brow-beating evangelists. I wonder if we laymen will ever be able to have a discussion about this without trying to prove to one another that we're right.

Published by Todd Newton

I'm very opinionated. That's probably the easiest thing to tell about me. I'm searching for and discovering a lot of new things about myself and about Christianity. If you want to discuss any of my pieces...  View profile

  • Atheism is a natural progression of thought due to the pendulum-swing effect of human society.
  • Belief is not proof. Disbelief is not disproof.
  • Weighing of benefits and consequences rarely motivate our decisions.
Most atheists classify Christians as all the same: brow-beating evangelists.

12 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Rachel4/23/2012

    I don't care you are a theist, and you shouldn't care that I am an atheist: but when some theists go around saying that atheists can't be moral, and that morality can only be found in your religion, that's a problem if I can't get a job or a loan or whatever. You might say that you don't think that way, but if you claim to be a theist you support those that do. The same argument goes for voting on civil laws based on dogma, instead of reason, such as denying rights to same-sex couples, and denying abortions to those who need one, etc.

  • Jack Oceano6/8/2008

    Would disbelief in unicorns also represent a "rebellious attitude" if everyone else believed in them despite all the contrary evidence? The U.S. scientists considered eminent enough by their peers to be elected into the National Academy of Sciences (95% of whom are atheists), are they just trying to be rebellious and cool? As Dawkins writes, "What is remarkable is the polar opposition between the religiosity of the American public at large and the atheism of the intellectual elite." Do you really think this is just a case of the smart kids trying to be cool? Or is it a matter of the ignorant being more susceptible to ridiculous superstition? I think it's pretty clear that it's the latter.

  • Jennifer Thompson6/7/2008

    Todd -- you ought to re-examine your "calculations." Take for instance the English Enlightenment -- also known as the Restoration or the Age of Reason. (1660ish on till the Romantic age) SEVERAL were atheists. Science was embraced. I'll have more to add to this lightly but your article is more than just offensive.

  • Kylyssa Shay3/11/2008

    I think more people are "out" about being atheists because there is less tolerance for religious discrimination than there was in the past. People used to basically get away with anything they wanted to do to an atheist or other non-Christian. With the advent of technology and the ever present mechanical witnesses, the camera and the video recorder people are forced to behave more civilly or face the exposure of their violent acts. I'm out now on the Internet because I don't have to fear being beaten for being an atheist online. In Calvinist West Michigan it would be foolish to admit to atheism so I keep my mouth shut about religion locally. You'd never get or keep a job as an "out" atheist here.

  • Todd Newton8/11/2007

    Hi Tiffany, thanks for commenting. I'm currently not able to respond fully right now but it seems like your comments might have actually been better suited compiled in a rebuttal article. I like what you had to say and will fill in the blanks at a later time.

  • Marissa Stanfield2/19/2007

    Todd, I know you wrote this article back some time, but I just read it. I really liked it and like your points. But, what i really liked was reading people's comments and your comments back. It makes me smile....widely

  • Todd Newton1/25/2007

    Donna, thanks for the comment. Did you know it's hard even being a Christian at work? People want you to leave your religion (or your anti-religion) at home. I don't evangelize but if people want to talk religion, theology or philosophy at work I endorse that. And I sincerely doubt that any self-respecting company would fire a person solely based on religion; they'd be open to multitudinous lawsuits.

  • Todd Newton1/25/2007

    Renee, thanks for the comment. Atheism may be right or wrong but ultimately it doesn't make any difference to me. People are more than welcome to believe whatever they find to be true as far as I'm concerned.

  • Todd Newton1/25/2007

    Heather, there's a difference between atheism being cool and atheism being "cool." I'm not discounting the fact that atheists are people too, it's the sincerity with which they pursue their "atheology" that I'm curious about.

  • Todd Newton1/25/2007

    I wish Jay had been able to finish his comment because he was on an interesting track. A bit angry, but interesting nonetheless.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.