Just as you have a right to vote, you also have a write to not vote. And not participating in what could be a broken, non-democratic process that is dysfunctional could be seen as a vote in itself. After all, let's face it, both Republicans and Democrats are basically cut from the same cloth. They do what they have to do to get elected and achieve a certain level of celebrity. Once they get in the power circle of Washington, all they have to do is cooperate, get along, and ensure that the richer candidates stay there so they can all share in the pot and mutually benefit from the massive connections to corrupt, and sometimes criminal corporate lobbyists. Besides, what motivation do they have to change or work harder to fix things.
We live in the highest producing country in the world, where people work harder and produce more than they did 20 years ago, yet the standard of living is falling dramatically, putting America near the bottom of the heap amongst developed nations in several standard of living categories. If they actually fixed the problems, ended imperialism, followed the constitution, and basically did their job like employees, than they'd be no different than the lowly 9 to 5 working class that pays their salaries so they can screw things up so so they can have a constant throng of people yearning for change and wanting to go to the polls to "do something about it" by empowering the very people who caused the problems in the first place.
With a general populace that is too busy, tired, apathetic, or ignorant in regards to the political process, why would they want to spoil the party for themselves by rocking the boat to do what is right by the United States constitution, which is a document that protects the people, but restrains the government; it was written to ruin there free ride and put a crimp on narcissistic gas bag "leaders" with grandiose fantasies about power and changing the world while they bankrupt the people they're supposed to serve.
So, if you decide to pull that lever in November to participate and be counted, what you're really doing is empowering a system that has tested the waters of breaking constitutional boundaries with an undeclared, unconstitutional war, a suspension of constitutional rights including habeaus corpus, and allowing the process to continue on its current trend of moving further and further away from being a constitituional republic to a gang of corrupt, self aggrandizing globalists who are quite comfortable having their cocktail party lifestyle funded by the shrinking middle class which loves to believe in their government and politics. They've gotten away with it. There was no military coup, no revolution. So like serial criminals, their confidence grows as they think, let's see what else we can get away with.
So, rather than have two choices of the same, or vote for an unelectable third party, you could have another choice to stay home and cast a vote in the form of a non-vote to show that you do not support a system, or a game, that is rigged just as a slot machine is rigged so the house always wins. As the Libertarian Jesse Ventura said in a recent interview: "People should have the choice to give a vote of 'no confidence' in their government and if enough people did that the system might change."
However, as long as people still buy into the festivities and carnival atmosphere of the elections, and listen the word "change" repeated so many times that it's embedded hypnotically into their subconscious to the point that they believe it, there will be no change and the only work politicians will have to do to continue to take millions more than they earn or produce is to put on their dog and pony show every four years, and then do what they want with our tax dollars as an ignorant and apathetic public that is used to the abuse just moves on, only to be captivated four years later hoping against hope that a politician will rise up to actually enact real change.
However, as Thomas Paine once elequently wrote, "even governments at their best are evil." That's why the founding fathers of America wanted an experiment with a government by the people for the people, not a government by the government, paid for by the people, for the government.
So, in November, I plan to do what George Carlin once said he does, stay home on the day that everyone else is lining up at the poles like cattle to pull their lever to perform "civic duty." However, as Carlin said, I will have a right to complain, since I chose to not empower a system that has become undemocratic, corrupt, and rigged to make the only electable candidates people who will continue to pontificate, bicker, and blow smoke to there hearts content all while saving money on toilet paper as our constitutional documents and Declaration of Independence will more than suffice.
Published by Peter R
- To Vote or Not to VoteIn which I attempt to think through the messy arena of politics (made even messier by religious association). My conclusion: avoid at all costs!
- How to Get Involved in the Political ProcessIf you don't bother to get involved and take action before the election then you deserve whoever gets elected and you won't have anything to say about it after the fact.
- The Jury System as Civic Duty in the United StatesIn United States courts, the jury is a system by which, in theory, defendants are given a trial that is fair and unbiased.
- Votergasm.org Gives People Added Incentive to Cast VotesVotergasm is an attempt to get people involved in voting through the easiest way known to man: sex.
Charlie Rangel and the Other Top 10 Most Corrupt Politicians in Washington If congress isn't take bribes then they must be betraying the country for free.
- Death, Taxes and Corrupt Politicians
- The Case Against Civic Temper Tantrums
- Corrupt Politicians in America
- Illinois Citizens Deserve Corrupt Government
- Why You Shouldn't Be Afraid to Date a Younger Man
- Show Your Kids How to Be Responsible
- To Vote or Not to Vote

2 Comments
Post a CommentI can complain. The louder people complain, and the more they do, the more likely things are to change. It's ignorance and a lack of knowledge and historical perspective that is the problem. How in the world can the president change anything. Like Ronald Reagan said it's like being at the back of a jetliner wanting to change where the airplane goes. Democracy can be corrupt if the majority are. Like Henry David thoreau said it's simply majority rules. Didn't the majority crucify christ and put Socrates to death? Also, how can you change things by being president when the entire system is controlled by corrupt international corporate bankers that you have to be a puppet for. The only way to bring about change is to work outside the system and educate people to realize that the system itself is outdated and flawed. Over a million people are dead in Iraq because democracy allowed the savages to rule. Would you want to democratize a maximum security prison? There is only freedom and tryann
How is democracy corrupt? And also, if you want to change things so badly. Please, by all means, run for president. If you don't want to do the job, or don't think you can, and also don't vote, THAN you can't complain.