Is George W. Bush the Inspiration for Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight?

Chadd De Las Casas
Stay the course is not a strategy, say some of President Bush's most ardent critics. As people die, a shift in strategy is needed, as attested by his low poll numbers. It is time, others reason, for him to abandon his cause of endurance, because it is a futile and unpopular policy.

But perhaps the most interesting thing of all is that all of these possible ideas on such a theme dissipate when these critics walk into a movie theater: what was once considered a "devastating" policy based on misguided arrogance and an unshakable desire to see the truth manifests itself in roaring applause and whole hearted support when the protagonist is being given the advice from Alfred, the dutiful and sagely butler at Bruce Wayne's side.

As the world burns into flames around him, facing diminishing support and a desire to just cave into what characters adamantly refer to as absolute terrorism, Gotham's Dark Knight is ready to cave. He wants to give in - if he just shifts plans, if he just gives himself up as the terrorists demand, maybe people will stop dying and a ray of hope will shine in on the people of the city who have suffered hospital bombings, selected assassinations, citizen kidnapping, and even video tapes of torture sent in to local news media.

However, as the billionaire is at his weakest, he confides himself in his friend.

"What would you have me do Alfred? People are dying," he tells him as he is burning his documents in total preparation of giving in to the Joker's demand to unmask himself.

"Endure," Alfred tells him. He goes on to explain that the road ahead is going to be an unpopular one, people will not like his decision, which will undoubtedly result in the deaths of more innocents - from civilians to police officers to elected officials. He tells him that he must, in essence, stay the course, and the people will not love him for it, but it is what needs to happen.

Initially when I walked into The Dark Knight, I was readying myself for what was told to me to be a heavy handed attack on the Bush Administration's domestic surveillance policies, which manifested itself in a form of protest from Lucious Fox, the character played by Morgan Freeman. It is true that when Batman is at his darkest hour of need, in an attempt to locate the Joker and undo everything that has been loosed on Gotham, he does set up a surveillance system that allows him to monitor every cell phone in the city. What's more, each cell phone emits a kind of sonar that allows him to map out every individual action in real time of every person using such a device.

The idea that this represents any kind of attack on the Bush Administration is largely cast aside, however, as much like the current Democrat controlled Congress, Lucious, despite an initial protest, concedes to the point, that catching the Joker is an imperative goal, there is no other option.

The film, throughout its course, runs a gamut of themes that are surprisingly benevolent towards the currently unpopular president, bringing to light a cadre of issues that seemingly turn the moral philosophy of anti-war critics upside down when the shimmering camera light of the Associated Press is replaced by an IMAX theater.

Throughout the film, Gotham's most ardent heroes are constantly tried to their very foundations by the world of madness around them.

With the body count piling, loved ones appearing on hit lists, and no end in sight to the terror unleashed by Gotham's most frightening foe, figures from Harvey Dent to Commissioner Gordan find themselves imposing tactics to catch the madman that they would not otherwise.

In one particularly telling scene, Harvey Dent manages to kidnap one of the Joker's men, and brings him to a remote and macabre place where the man is tied to a chair for interrogation. He is wearing a name tag that reads "Rachael Dawes", an absolute message from the Joker that this woman, who happens to be Harvey Dent's love interest and potential fiancee, is the next target.

Faced with what he feels to be no other options, what can be described accurately as psychological torture is unleashed on the man.

In a form of Russian roulette, Harvey threatens the man with a gun, and warns that a game of heads and tails will determine his fate. Although the game is rigged, and both sides of the coin are heads thereby insuring that the man will suffer no permanent damage, the effect is clearly seen on the man throughout the scene before Batman arrives to stop Harvey. The intent, he advises, is not to stop him from doing something morally unscrupulous, as the caped crusader unleashes his own volley of torture throughout the film (even dropping one particular subject from a third or fourth story balcony with the sole intent of breaking his legs for information), but because of the damage it would cause to the man's image.

Better for Batman to remain the villain than the public defender, District Attorney Harvey Dent.

The Dark Knight is a film built on a Machiavellian premise, told ultimately through the advice of Alfred, who consistently explains the illogical mentality of men who only want to do harm unto the world. In one particularly blunt examination of the film's philosophy, he explains how in Burma to catch a bandit who was stealing from the local government, when all their wit was at an end, they finally captured the man by lighting the entire forest on fire, which seems to unlock something in the grieving Bruce Wayne.

The final premise of the film, told in Batman's flight from the police, is that the dark knight is not a hero, and he does not ask to be, but rather does what is unpopular so that he can do what is right. The Joker, indisputably, needs to be stopped, as his reign of terror represents nothing more than a psychological addiction to chaos.

But all the same, a bereaved people call on Batman to just meet the terrorist's demands, and despite all of this, he is advised to stay the course, to fight the terrorists, and endure the unpopularity of such a decision.

This ushers the question of whether or not, with so many similarities to the stay the course strategies against modern terror, George W. Bush represents the current icon or inspiration of Christopher Nolan's own Dark Knight.

Published by Chadd De Las Casas

I was born in Valencia, California in 1987. It's ironic that I turned out to be a writer, since my first exposure to it was an essay about why I hate writing. I am also the owner of the Content Producers Wiki.  View profile

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Avenging World10/8/2010

    The Dark knight is definitely about George Bush, but as the Joker , not as Batman.

    The giveaway is that Joker implodes the Hospital building by setting off pre-planted charges with a remote device, not by crashing a plane into it.

    In other words, why not Osama's M.O. ?
    Why the M.O. ascribed to Bush by Loose Change et al ?

    And then there's the appearance of Senator Patrick Leahy.

  • Donald Pennington2/28/2009

    Maybe it was just propaganda...But I'm a conspiracy believer...

  • rcccd8/6/2008

    Batman/Bush comparisons? Let's see, torturing the Joker in the police station to acquire any information as to the whereabouts of both DA"s. Gitmo sound familar? What amount of torture would you deliver if your son or daughter were being held by a psychopath in order to save their lives? Taping the phones to locate the terrorists, yes it could save hundreds if not thousands of lives and to think one of those lives could be yours. Pursuing the terrorists without consequence to ones self in order to keep Gotham/America safer for all. Batman/Bush accepting all the responsibilty even in chaos in order to protect the millions of Gotham/American citizens. At the end of the movie/term limits the majority of Gotham/America hating the heros even if they both only wish a terror free world. Americans and Gothamites simply wishing for peace, liberty and freedom who will protect those rights till the death while providing those same rights to the uninformed liberals who believe America is the Joker

  • MCT8/3/2008

    I hope that Christopher Nolan finally puts this ridiculous notion that Bush = Batman to rest. The Batman character existed far before Dubya was around and to compare the Batman persona to Bush is insulting.

  • Sheryl Young7/30/2008

    It seems you can't go to a movie lately without it being a political commentary. Even most fluffy romances try to make some sort of statement.

  • Chadd De Las Casas7/29/2008

    It's funny that to say that I'm calling Bush a hero, especially when I use THIS movie as a comparison, is indicative of zero reading comprehension.

  • Jeff Musall7/29/2008

    I regret that I have been too busy to catch the movie yet, so I can't comment too much on the comparision, except to say trying to make Bush sound heroic is like trying to make Bill O'Reilly sound "fair and balanced." As for what Bush inspires....maybe a flush?

  • paul angelo7/29/2008

    I am going to write my own article on this subject later tonight Chadd--peace

  • paul angelo7/29/2008

    How are things Chadd? I'm not surprised that you would take the most simplistic interpretation of the film. The other day I read the following, which is a good rebuttal to your take: http://porch-dog.com/?p=418

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.