Is Kate Middleton Really Royalty

lindagoffigan
The royal wedding is over and Kate Middleton has married Prince William at Westminster Abby complete with two wedding kisses at Buckingham Palace. But is Kate really royalty with the tidbit of information that leaked out after the royal nuptials.

Soon after viewing the royal wedding televised on TLC and many other networks, there were radio announcements about Kate painting Prince William who is now the Duke of Cambridge photo on her fingernails. Can anyone imagine the queen performing such a feat in light of having available a number of acclaimed artists who would gladly have reproduced a portrait of the two instead of fingernail polish that can be removed with polish remover. It is inconceivable that Kate who wore a real diamond tiara donated from the Queen of England to resort to antics of a teenager airbrushing her fingernails with her partner instead of making the portrait official with a fully fledged painting of Prince William.

Also, as illustrated in the New York Times, even though the royal couple departed the reception in a late model luxury sports car, the balloons attached were not fit for a royal couple. The license plates also read JU5T WED as if the plates were going to be retained to remind others that Kate had nabbed the most eligible Prince available.

Or is the consensus that Kate's mother Carole Middleton decided to advertise her million dollar party favors Internet business with a show of the helium balloons. Should not the vehicle been embellished with thousands of those helium balloons instead of just a few because after all the royal could was in the sports car and the wedding had cost over $40 million. Security, alone for the royal wedding had been estimated to be about 23 million so is not such a precious royal couple worth more than a few helium balloons attached to a sports car with the Prince himself driving?

Although, Kate is a petite woman and chose appropriately according to the TLC wedding fashion reporters the small bunch of wedding flowers, should not the occasions that was viewed by over 3 billion people been a bit more elaborate. While the TLC commentator lamented over Carole Middleton, the mother of the bride lack of bling on her well fitted rather bland colored but fitted suit, more comments should have been made about the use of those helium balloons and praise that she did not chew gum at the wedding as in another public event. The helium balloons should have been dashed for a more royal sighting more appropriate for a royal princess and more in attune with the wedding of Prince William's mother, Lady Diana.

Is Kate Middleton really royalty or is Prince William correct not to wear his wedding ring as an indication that a royal wedding in fact maybe did not take place after such a stop and go college relationship. Kate also made certain that her wedding vows were not insidious with the phrase to obey your royal highness and left that part out of her royal nuptials. Royalty still involved two people attempting to make a life together of harmony. But with Kate making the wedding so contemporary instead of full of royal history except for the accents of the chants of the wedding priest; one cannot help but ask the perennial question: "Is Kate Middleton Really Royalty?"

Published by lindagoffigan

lindagoffigan writes authoritative articles on relationships, politics, business, real estate, wellness, entertainment articles of relevance and interest. lindagoffigan writes for WordPress, Hubpages, eHo...  View profile

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.