A majority of the people in the world who utilize the internet come in contact with so called "pirated" software or music or some other data, at one time or another. Often such people are not worried about the consequences of use of such "pirated" software. In fact, most people would continue to download pirated software at their own leisure while not recognizing its legal value. There are very few people who actually bother being purely original, or who have downloaded pirated data without knowing that it is illegal.
We must ask ourselves who makes laws? It is said that society makes laws and criminals break them. But if the majority of the society does not recognize the existence of the law, can you actually say that the law was made by the society. This argument holds true especially in the case of piracy over the internet, as majority of the users of the internet do not recognize downloading software, music or data as illegal. This would indicate that majority of the society does not recognize downloading such data illegal and therefore who is to say that such a law against it exists. If every person is equal in this world, why should users on the internet have to follow the laws laid down by the rich minority. Shouldn't the law consider the opinion of majority of the people?
Free use of the internet for such purposes may seem illegal, but considering that majority of the people all over the world can't afford everything as it is and if provided free there is benefit in the development of culture, mind and development of intellect as well. In fact, the internet has revolutionized learning and teaching all over the world. Even developing countries can now have access to the best resources for education thanks to this wonderful free media. It must be noted that such use for educational purposes should in fact be propagated and not curbed.
I leave this topic with doubts in my mind and open to any comments. I hope that the free use of the internet is not curbed and the enthusiasm for people to use this medium of freedom for expression and exchange forever.
Published by Akul Mehta
Hi. I am a pharmacy graduate from MET Institute of Pharmacy (Bandra - Mumbai). View profile
- Will New Chinese Laws Effectively Combat the Piracy Problem?
- Movie Piracy Crackdown
- The Piracy of Video Games: To Download or Not to Download
- Music Piracy: Who Cares?
- Piracy and Gen-X: Bootlegs, the Third World and a Generation of Law Breakers
- Great Lakes Piracy: Pirates Thrived on the Great Lakes Long After Their Golden Age
- A History of Piracy in the Caribbean
- What is piracy over the internet?
- Does a law exist if majority of the society doesn't decide its existance?
- What is really more important, freedom to information or money?




2 Comments
Post a CommentIts a different point of view but a very true one. The world will define piracy better in a few years time
Wow this is really food for thought. This article is well written and it really makes me wonder of what is right and what is wrong. It is not just a rationalization but more of logical reasoning for the improvement of human beings all over the world by making information freely available.