Is the PlayStation 3 Worth $600

On November 11, Sony Will Introduce a Game System Price at $600

Shaun M Mathis
With November 11 vastly approaching video gamers around the world are holding their breath for the release of Sony's PlayStation 3. Thanks to having excellent connections here in Philadelphia, a longtime friend of mine by the name of Daniel allowed me to test the highly anticipated gamming system and the new Tekken 6 game for myself. Now before I get too deep I must say I am a vivid video game player, but after demonstrating the PlayStation 3 for myself I must say I am unimpressed and no the PlayStation 3 is not worth the hefty price tag of $600.

As Daniel outlined all the features of the system I found myself drawing a mental picture of what a UFO spaceship would look like under the hood. First, unlike the 2005 release of Microsoft's Xbox 360, the PlayStation 3 will come in two colors. The first is the black to be released November 11 and the white in early March of 2007. Next, the PlayStation 3 will be available in two different versions, which are the "basic", and the "premium" versions. What makes them different is that the basic version only comes with a 20 GB hard drive when the premium has a 60 GB hard drive along with, Wi-Fi connectivity, HDMI output and a multiple flash memory. Thus far the PlayStation 3 sounds a lot like my Mac Book OS X but it doesn't stop there. It also comes equipped with one GB Ethernet port, a 2.0 USB, a 2.0 EDR Bluetooth, CD, DVD, SACD and MB/s blu-ray Are you lost now? You should be because when it comes down to it all, all we want to do is play a freaking videogame.

The only 2 things the PlayStation 3 offers that is of some relevance is that is comes with backward compatibility with the PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and every PS1 & PS2 game that observes it's respective systems TRC (technical requirements checklist) That is about thirty percent of all PS1 & PS2 games. Sony argues that is by accident but after reading an article in Game Informer I discovered that the games for the PlayStation 3 will be in the price range of $60-$100, for a game! The second is the Wi-Fi connectivity and Ethernet port to enable gaming with other users. Again I say in the long run the PlayStation 3 is not worth $600 and here is why. First, most households today already have at least one PC and or laptop that plays DVD's, and CD's. According to a report put out by sound scan in July with the release of Apple's iPod in 2003, CD sales have plummeted 60%, so I don't feel the need to want to put a CD in my PlayStation 3.

If I want to listen music while I play since the game system comes with a USB I can connect my iPod nano to it. Second, Sony incorporated a MB/s Blu-ray disc, which is supposed to replace DVD's. The movies for the Blu-ray are about $55 and only about fifty titles are currently available. It seems to me that Sony took my laptop, DVD player, all the previous PlayStation systems and threw them into a big steaming pot and cooked up the PlayStation 3. As a gamer the only thing I want out of a system is real-life graphics, that aren't better than Microsoft's Xbox 360, impeccable loading speed, a big memory and the ability to play other gamers across the world. For me the problem lies with all the other junk that come along with this system that I am not going to use but I am paying for. The only thing the PlayStation 3 can't do is type a term paper and download music (yet). Personally when it comes down to it the point is gamming systems should be kept simple. Put in one disc & play and kept at a price which is affordable to the masses, $300, and even that sounds a little steep for something that is reinvented every two or three years.

The PlayStation 3 has too much technology in a gamming system. I am not going to watch a DVD on my system, I am not going to play a CD on my gamming system nor am I going to spend $55 on a Blu-ray movie disc. With the price of the system which is $600, $60-$100 for a game then an extra controller (because it comes with only one) the price jumps to a little under $800. Even if you only buy three games you'll spend $1,000. That seems a little extreme for something you'll play about three times a week. $800-$1,000 plays my rent, car payment and insurance.

No the PlayStation 3 is not worth $600. It was a very diverse selection of games, pixel perfect graphics and everything else to drive up the price but I fear parents and gamers will stand in line for hours on November 10th to purchase the PlayStation 3 only to get home and realize they were better off the Microsoft's Xbox 360. That is the system I am staying with. Sony, no

Published by Shaun M Mathis

I am 26 from Connecticut that enjoys thinking and writing about articles "outside the box" I am a bit argumenative but I also shed new light to previous & existing topics/situations that are going on all ar...  View profile

  • PlayStation 3 will be available in two different versions, which are the "basic", and the "premium"
  • PlayStation 3 offers backward compatibility with the PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and every PS1 & PS2
  • PlayStation 3 will be in the price range of $60-$100, for a game!
Even if you only buy three games you'll spend $1,000. In addition to $40 for a second controller because the system only comes with one.

12 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Harry10/31/2008

    Th PS3 has lost this generation, it got owned by The XBox360 and Wii.

  • Storm Jackson8/2/2007

    I don't think it's worth $600, or $500 with that price drop.

  • Bugman5/23/2007

    Ok the playstation 3 has some cool features. But i'm tired of people throwing all of its unneccesary features in my face. I don't want a blu ray player or ports for my camera memory cards. I want a quality gaming system that has a easy to use online gaming experience and doesn't cost 700 dollars. I love my Xbox 360 and i wouldn't trade it if i could. I don't think the ps3 sucks, But graphics wise why pay more money when i can get the same graphics on a less expensive system.

  • boil3rr5/16/2007

    u guyz r fwkin retards 1st of learn how 2 speak english secondly do ne of u guyz own a 360? u need a fwkin hi def TV 2 experience blue ray dats @ least 1k home theater would b nice but dats also 700$ 4 a decent 1 allreite ya true that it has some good titles but da internet sucks the online gameplay cant comapre to xbox live. i got da ps3 and xbox and 360 is by far better more interesting titles and in my opinion more fun to play i dont want 2 rip on da ps3 i just tink dat rite now it doesnt compare to 360 in da long run however itll prally beat it

  • josh4/26/2007

    xbox 360 is gay

  • josh 4/26/2007

    the xbox sucks

  • ps3 fanboy12/28/2006

    the playstation 3 will always be the best because it has so many features which other console could compare 2.it even has better games and it looks better.the wii is crap and the xbox is crap 2.if it had tonumber it the playstation will be first and then the xbox then the wii.

  • PS3 lover11/27/2006

    PS3 is the best systems in earth.People say that the Wii is better but what so fun about Wii.The playstation3 is better then the Wii because the Wii dosen't have 60GB or bluray.In playstation 3 cost more then Wii(Wii cost$249.99 and PS2 cost$600.00) because it has BluRay and cool gams and the Wii cost less because it dosen't have cool game or dosen't have BluRay.PLAYSTATION 3 IS THE BEST

  • I agree with SG11/20/2006

    With the BluRay you see a crisper picture and the discs are able to hold up more than 2x the amount of memory because there are more layers. also a bluray player by itself is a 1000$ and up. and Xbox games are also going for 60$ too, not to mention that you have to pay 50$ a year if you are an online gamer. and most xbox players play for Halo 2. so really in the end your paying the same price, but when you stack up the statistics, PS3 wins, just not on the initial cost.

  • Leave me alone11/18/2006

    playstation 3 sucks!!!

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.