In order to change the baseball schedule the committee is looking at a plan where teams could switch divisions based on rather they are believe they are going to be competitive or not . Here is an example the Kansas City Royals decide that they are in a rebuilding mode and thus not ready to compete, I know real hard to imagine, and they decide to move to the American League East, so at the very least they will have some nice crowds at Kauffman Stadium for the games against the Red Sox and Yankees.
First of all let me applaud baseball for looking at different solutions to their problems. Now comes the but part of the conversation, I just don't think this particular plan is a good one. Having teams floating in and out of divisions every few years to me seems overly radical and even a bit confusing for casual fans. I will admit I am a bit of a purist when it comes to baseball, but having the St. Louis Cardinals win the Central Division title one year and the Eastern Division the next seems silly to me.
I have a few questions for the panel. First are the Red Sox and Yankees forced to stay in the AL East, because this plan is obviously aimed at these two teams among a few other big market teams? Second how can we be sure that we won't wind up with just two team in the AL East because no other teams want to take on the dreaded Nation and Empire? Third what impact does this plan have on rivalries in the game, if the Cubs decide to jump to the NL East doesn't that in turn hurt the Cardinals?
This plan to me is just a bit ridiculous. No other league in American sports has teams jumping form division to division and I don''t think this is a trend that MLB wants to start, this isn't English Premiere League Soccer after all. So kudos to some different thinking by the committee, but this one is just too radical. Maybe the committee should look into a salary floor to help the smaller market teams compete or expand revenue sharing, making sure that the money small market teams receive goes towards the on the field product and not in the owner's pockets. Yes I'm looking at you Kansas City Royals owner David Glass.
Published by Darren Pare - Featured Contributor in Sports
I am an author from Orono, Maine currently working on writing my second book and promoting my first one, 33 Summers. I am married and have two children. I am a freelance writer who has a passion for sports... View profile
- Top 5 Kansas City Royals Keepers - Fantasy Baseball Draft Guide 2009This is by far the easiest selection from the newly loaded Kansas City Royals.
- Top 5 Overall Kansas City Royals Rookies - 2009 Fantasy Baseball Draft GuideIn this article we will examine the Top 5 Overall Kansas City Royals Rookies and their fantasy baseball value. They are ranked by their projected 2009 statistics in common fantasy baseball categories.
- Kansas City Royals Rookie of the Year WinnersIn their 40 year history the Kansas City Royals have had many great players, but only four have been named American League Rookie of the Year. Here is a look at the four players who won the Rookie of the Year Award wi...
The Rise of the Red Sox and MetsThere are two teams in the MLB this year that we all know and are doing great. And when I say great I mean freaking unbelievable great. Those two teams are...drum roll please......- 2008 Kansas City Royals OverviewA preview of the Kansas City Royals for the 2008 MLB season
- How Revenue Sharing is Slowly Killing Parody in Baseball
- Minor League Baseball: A Cheap and Fun Alternative to the Majors
- Top 5 Kansas City Royals Keepers - Fantasy Baseball Draft Strategy Guide 2009
- Can Major League Baseball Survive Without the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees...
- Fantasy Baseball Draft Guide 2009: Top 5 Kansas City Royals Keepers
- Victor Martinez Trade Takes Place Between Boston Red Sox and Cleveland Indians; Ni...
- Kansas City Royals 40th Anniversary Team



