Is Sarah Palin More Qualified for President Than Barack Obama?

I am very conservative, and I actually wrote: "Should Women Have the Right to Vote?" Of course, I believe women should have the right, but I wrote this mainly to create awareness about feminists who vote based on women's causes, while ignoring those who might actually be a better candidate. If I support either a man or a woman for office, you can rest assured he or she has very high integrity.

I would first like to mention "experience" as it relates to being qualified. I'll also briefly explain how it compares to other factors.

Experience, in my book, has a certain level of importance, but it does not have as high of a level as a good heart, sound character and a determination to stand for truth and justice (or to do a job properly). If I were to hire someone in my business, I would consider experience, but I'd look for the other factors first. If these qualifications were lacking, all the experience in the world would matter little if any to me.

Barack Obama appears to be deficient in both areas, with all due respect. He stands for everything off beam, including sky-high taxation in every area of our lives. This could include income tax, employment tax, capital gains tax and many others. Taxes are going to be necessary to fund his health care and other programs that will be destined to fail.

Obama is oriented in an erroneous way of thinking, according to a Marxist mentality. That says a lot about his character, and his experience largely involves being a "community organizer."

If Obama is elected, he could bring about great harm. He and the Democrats in Congress could jeopardize most of our constitutional rights, including the First Amendment with a so-called "Fairness Doctrine" and the Second Amendment with a gun-grabbing plan aimed at honest citizens. Barack also stands for all of the horrifying liberal causes known to the human race.

Sarah Palin is a refreshing new figure who has a great combination of experience and moral fiber.

She has the impressive recent history of being a mayor and the governor of the state of Alaska. She has proven herself to be a down to earth fighter, standing against massive corruption in her state. She has accomplished much during her terms in office, and has brought about great "change" that Obama talks about, but mostly refuses to define.

Sarah is a bona-fide butt-kicker, and I imagine she would chase down terrorists like hunting a moose in the Alaska wilderness.

Barack Obama, however, seems to be more of an appeaser like Neville Chamberlain, who tried to "negotiate" with the infamous dictator of his era, thus endangering the entire world. I discussed his shortcomings with my friend, Stuart, in "Barack Obama Exposed: An Interview with a Conservative Analyst."The amazing part is: Sarah Palin is only running for vice president! She appears to be far more qualified for president than Obama.

Of course, we all know that John McCain is the presidential candidate, and people should base their decision on McCain vs. Obama. Because I feel John McCain is the best choice, and because he's chosen a running mate who's fully competent, I am therefore giving my recommendation to vote for the McCain/Palin team in the November election of 2008!