Admittedly, there is a bit of confusion in the story. Information is attributed to "senior officials" of both the US and Pakistani governments. Were they confronted with the story and had little choice but to comment? Were they purposely leaking sensitive information? What benefits, if any, will be conferred upon the the governments of either country? I'd like to think that information was extracted from Pakistani officials prior to any approaches to US sources.
Perhaps I am missing something, but this story makes me angry and tearful as it appears to have no redeeming value, except to highlight the writing of the two left-leaning authors. What benefit does it have? It benefits al-Qaeda and the Taliban. It places another roadblock in the efforts of the United States to fight terrorism. But worst of all, if the program of striking al-Qaeda and the Taliban in areas where they feel safe is derailed or terminated, it will indirectly result in the deaths of our soldiers.
I would love to have these journalists address an audience composed of soldiers and their families. Probably the question to be asked is, why are you doing this?" Why would you want to contribute to the success of our enemies? Is your right to report on this program more important than the life of my husband, wife, father brother or other family member? Do you feel any responsibility for your actions? Do you know you are providing support to our enemies? Do you care? The same could be asked of any "senior officials" that may have taken it upon themselves to leak information.
There are many other questions, but suffice it to say that I believe that they, and others of their ilk, are contributing to the deaths of our soldiers. Shame on them, the Washington Post and any others responsible for this "leak". It certainly appears as if this article rises to the level of journalistic murder.
The irony is that our armed forces will continue the fight to protect our homeland and the rights of these journalists and others to freely report, even if their right to report is not accomplished in a responsible manner. They and their families can sleep better at night because our armed forces seek to protect them, even at the risk of dying because they undermine their efforts.
Published by Clark Richards
Clark Richards is a retired soldier, business owner and teacher that has traveled extensively throughout Europe, South America, Asia and Australia. View profile
- The Good & Dark Side of Modernization a paper based on the theme of modernization and the three examples which follow
-
Small Majority of Americans Would Support Anti-Terrorism Action in Afgha...
The latest Gallup Poll compares Americans' thoughts on the war in Iraq with what they think of the previous actions in Afghanistan and what they would think of sending troops to...
- Stratfor: Strategic Motivations for the Mumbai Attack An analysis of the terror attack in Mumbai, India.
- Open Letter to the Democratic Party Author's opinion on how the election will turn out.
- Former Congressman Mark Siljander Indicted for Money Laundering and Supporting Ter... Former Congressman Mark Siljander has been indicted, along with an Islamic non-profit organization and several others, on charges resulting from support he allegedly gave to the organization which is said to provide f...
- Al-Qaeda Stepping Up Attacks in Iraq - Hopes to Establishe Shadow Government
- The End of Al-Qaeda in Iraq - the Unheralded Victory
- Canada's Role in NATO against al-Qaeda and Taliban Examined
- Obama's First 100 Days: The Trouble with Pakistan and the Taliban
- Former Congressman Mark Deli Siljander Charged with Aiding and Abetting Terrorism
- Justification for the Iraq War and the Abandonment of Afghanistan
- Al-Zawahri Calls Barack Obama a "House Negro"
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
6 Comments
Post a CommentThe questions you pose to the propagandists will fall on deaf ears and empty souls..in their world of moral relativism they are devoid of "care" and values...Americanism and Patriotism are to be scoffed at...I share your sentiment and pain brother.
Ditto everyone's remarks so far. Don't even get me started on all the stuff the "mainstream" media is causing!!
Clark, The press seems to have one agenda and only one... to tell the story that best paints the picture that they see. We have established that their reporting is oftentimes dishonest. It is that same dishonesty and lack of regard for others that causes them to undermine our troops. 5 stars!
I agree that the press shouldn't report secret plots,etc. Remember when Geraldo Rivera blabbed where he was behind enemy lines on Fox News? There was little outrage and that angered me greatly. He should've been fired!
yep the press tends to do that everywhere
I've come to regard journalism in our mainstream media outlets as agenda-driven, self-serving, myopic fools. The story more and more is about the spin based on shadowy, unnamed sources than facts presented objectively. Journalists these days are nothing more than glorified gossip peddlers. The thought that our soldiers are risking their lives while soft-assed know-nothings scrounge for fame by jeopardizing men and missions is disgusting. Thank you for writing this piece.