'Islam', 'Islamic', and 'Jihad' to Be Expunged from National Security Documents
The Politically Correct War on Terror
The stated purpose appears to be to reassure peaceful Islamic countries that in fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban and in confronting Iran, the United States is not, ipso facto, at war with Islam. Some analysts consider the effort an exercise in political correctness.
"The change is a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventative war and currently states: 'The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.'"
The Obama administration is keen to conduct outreach to Islamic countries, including many in Africa, the better to help solve problems of disease and poverty in those countries. The feeling seems to be that saying that one is conducting a "struggle against militant Islamic radicalism" will get in the way of all that.
Of course American Marines and soldiers will still fight the Taliban and Afghanistan and Predator drones will still fire Hellfire missiles at Al Qaeda targets in places such as Waziristan and Yemen. America will still push for sanctions against Iran to prevent that Islamic country from getting nuclear weapons and reserves the right to use military force for the same purpose.
The exercise seems to be more an attempt to change the tone rather than actual policy. It does seem, though, to be the rough equivalent of, say in World War II, expunging the term "fascist" from war planning documents the better not to offend fascists who were not German or Italian. There were, after all, fascists in Spain and South America at the time with whom the United States was not at war and even maintained cordial relations.
The expunging of references to Islam in national security documents seem also to coddle Muslims who, while peaceful enough, are rather passive when their coreligionist use Islam as an excuse to commit murder and mayhem. Al Qaeda and the Taliban call themselves Muslim and wage jihad in the name of Islam. It seems incongruous that the United States will not acknowledge the same thing.
It should also be noted that the Obama administration and its supporters are not so finicky as they are with Islamic terrorists when referring to Tea Party protesters, calling them "racists," "homophobes," and worse. And yet the Tea Partiers have killed no one, harmed no one, threaten no one, except at the ballot box. The dichotomy could not be more apparent.
Source: Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document, AP, April 7th, 2010
Published by Mark Whittington
Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington... View profile
Islamic Marriage Contracts, Polygamy and DivorceEffects of Islamic laws concerning marriage contracts, polygamy, and divorce on women.- Lifting the Veil on Islamic FeminismThis essay explores the struggles and dangers faced by women in traditional Islamic societies, and their feminist response to these obstacles.
- Why Islamic Revolution Failed to SpreadBy closely examining certain factors in Iran, and comparing them to the state of affairs in Iraq and Saudi Arabia, it is easy to see why Iran's Islamic revolution was unable to spread to either Iraq or Saudi Arabia..
- Islamic FuneralsThe washing and shrouding rituals are important in an Islamic burial and the mosques in United States have stepped in to ease the process and get land marked for their dead. Also, they have adapted by relaxing some of...
- Can Evangelical Christians Vote for Barack Obama?Barack Obama has done something that has not been done by the Democratic Party in decades. He has polarized the evangelical Christian vote. But based on scripture, can evangelical Christians vote for Obama without com...
- Why The National Security Strategy of the United States of America Will Not Preven...
- Assessing the U.S. National Security Strategy
- Obama vs. Cheney on National Security
- "Endorse a Sustainable 10th Malaysian Plan as a Solution to the Weakness in the Na...
- Islamic Schools or Terrorism Camps
- Islamic Revolution Will Return Us to the Dark Ages? No, the Dark Ages was a Singul...
- Elizabeth Warnock Fernea's book In Search of Islamic Feminism





8 Comments
Post a CommentI don't know why I keep reading your articles, Mark. It's not because I don't think you're a great writer... it's because I've reached the stage that everytime you point something like this out, I want to go bang my head on the wall. The stupidity of this administration is astounding.
Just a continuation of the expunging process this administration began with the Constitution.
I liked the "Politically Correct War On Terror" nice
You write crap...real journalism does not pick sides....
Good article; you never know where "Obamacare" can go careless! What's next?
Great article. Political correctness is a dangerous thing.
Unbelievable; reminiscent of 1984 when changing news stories and wordings gave rise to a whole new ministry cadre. What's next ... thought-crime? Excellent article!
Thank you for your submission. Your article has been featured on AC's news category.