A central tenet of Israeli Defense Force doctrine, according to the Jewish Virtual Library of the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise, is to have conflict occur outside of Israeli territory if possible by transferring the battle to the opponent's land. Long-range missile capabilities allow Israel to do just that. In previous conflicts Israel has moved quickly to ensure fighting took place outside its borders. In the 1967 six day war, Israel launched a preemptive attack against Egyptian forces massed along its border, and Israeli ground forces quickly moved into Lebanon in the summer of 2006 in response to rocket attacks by the terrorist group Hezbollah.
The question of nuclear capability on Israel's new missile is likely to remain clouded in mystery for some time. Israel has never admitted to possessing nuclear weapons, although much of the world has acknowledged the Jewish state's nuclear capability. The development of a new nuclear capable long-range missile is likely in response to an announcement by Iran, one of Israel's most likely adversaries, late last year that it had developed a new ballistic missile with a range of more than 1,200 miles. Such a capability would allow Tehran to fire long-range missiles capable of striking Israeli territory.
Iran has invested a lot of money and effort into its ballistic missile program, with the Shahab-3 missile being the most capable platform demonstrated to outside nations. A long-range missile capability for Iran is worrisome to Israel, which has been the subject of inflammatory rhetoric from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. So far there is no evidence that Iran has developed a long-range ballistic missile capable of delivering a nuclear warhead. Iran asserts that it has no nuclear weapons program, a claim supported by a recent U.S. National Intelligence Estimate that concluded Iran halted such a program more than four years ago.
While Iran has no demonstrated nuclear missile capability, GlobalSecurity.org, a defense think tank, says Tehran developed a chemical missile capability to retaliate for Iraqi chemical attacks during the Iran-Iraq war. The development of a new missile, possibly capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, by Israel raises the stakes in an already volatile region.
Sources: American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise, GlobalSecurity.org
Published by AC Writer
I have very diverse interests and never seem to know what's going to hold my attention at any given time. View profile
Israel Makes a Peace Offer to SyriaA long sought offer of peace between Israel and Syria may be imminent. Israel has offered the return of the Golan Heights in return for discontinuance of Syrian support of Islam...- Bush, Italian President Napolitano Meet, Discuss War on Terror and Iran"Iran is dangerous, and they'll be even more dangerous if they learn how to enrich uranium."
- In an Effort to Disparage Israel, Palestinians Recognize Israel's MoralityAt almost the same moment as U.N. Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour cited mass human rights violations perpetuated against Palestinians by Israel, Palestinians contradicted her, unintentionally proclaimed Is...
- The Irony that Can Only Befall IsraelThe appointment of right winger Avigdor Lieberman to the Knesset raised some serious questions as to the attention Israel gets on the World Stage. However, the kind of politics and positions that he and his party tak...
- Great Britain to Knight Satanic Verses Author Salman Rushdie, Iran Calls Action An...Author of the Satanic Verses, a book that resulted in a fatwa for his death issued by Grand Ayatollah Khomeini, Salman Rushdie is set to be knighted by Great Britain, and this has created a stir in Iran.
- Tell Israel: Back Up Now..
- America Should Stand Against Israel Against Terrorism
- Israel vs. Lebanon - Disproportionate Force?
- Israel Has Nuclear Weapons, Should We Invade Them?
- Leonardo DiCaprio's Bodyguards Arrested in Israel
- Iran: Why Sanctions or Military Force by the U.S. Will Fail
- Keeping an Eye on the North Korean Missile Test Plans


1 Comments
Post a CommentWell, if they built the missile, they made it nuclear-capable for sure. Only countries with ineffectual airpower rely on tactical missiles to deliver conventional munitions.