It's a Judgment Thing

Tony Sarrecchia
In a disingenuous speech, marginally designed to distance Obama from his whackadoo minster Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the Senator managed to turn the issue from the anti-American rantings of Reverend Wright to a thinly veiled condemnation of those calling out the Reverend's words. At the heart of Obama's speech is the theme that the Reverend isn't wrong, but that everyone else needs to pay more attention to race. The Senator's exact quote, '...race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now'*. When have we ever ignored race in this country? If anything, we are so obsessed with race that we see racial slights in the most mundane and inconsequential events. Obama's slickness however, isn't that he re-framed the question to be about race rather than anti-American ramblings by his Black Separatist pastor, but how he was able to talk for 20 minutes and never really say anything of substance.

In ten pages of text, Senator Obama never distances himself from Wright, if anything, the speech is almost a defense of the Reverend. Obama said "I can no more disown him [Reverend Wright] than I can disown the black community". One clearly cannot disown his race, but you can drive to a different church on Sunday. When the Senator says he disagrees with some of the more inflammatory comments (though he never actually says which comments he disagrees with: that the AIDS virus was created by the government to wipe out the black community; that the chickens have come home to roost in reference to 9/11; or that God should damn the USA) he is quick to add that we've all heard things from our "pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you [we've] strongly disagreed." You are correct Senator, but when I found myself 'strongly disagreeing' with something my priest said, I left the church. I didn't continue to go there week after week, year after year, giving implicit endorsement by my presence or financial endorsement through my offerings.

The Senator believes that we still need to march to a "more just, more equal, more free, more caring, and more prosperous America". What the Senator doesn't do is tell us how we will know when we get there. Does 'more equal' mean a level playing field in which one isn't given preferential treatment based on skin color, gender, sexual orientation or family ties? If the answer is yes, then the Senator should say so and let the discussion begin. If the answer is no, then the Senator wants to have the same old arguments about race-the lectures in which whites must listen but are not allowed to contribute. Obama then goes on to say that we need to move on about race, but spends two paragraphs defending why Reverend Wright is still stuck in the fifties and sixties with regards to racial relations.

Supporters and apologists for Senator Obama have called him an 'inspirational speaker'. The New York Observer wrote an article about Obama's delivery essentially calling him a cross between Dr. Martin Luther King and John F. Kennedy ("What Makes Obama a Good Speaker?", http://www.observer.com/2008/what-makes-obama-good-speaker), and no one can deny Obama's oratory skills. The content of this speech however, is more like a Bruce Willis movie than a JFK speech, all flash and no substance.

Reverend Wright is certainly free to say what he believes. Though he may want to cover the original sin concept again. According to Obama, "it [the Constitution] was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery". Technically, according to Christian cannon, original sin was man's violation of God's law. I'm just saying. Scriptural inaccuracies aside, Reverend Wright's job is to shepherd his congregation as he sees fit. Senator Obama also has every right to attend the church of his choice. The Senator is asking us to use his past judgment as a benchmark to award him the presidency of the US. I agree. Twenty years of support to a vehemently anti-American pastor tells us quite a bit about the Senator's judgment.

*All quotes unless indicated otherwise are from the Remarks of Senator Barack Obama, "A More Perfect Union" Speech. Given at the Constitution Center, Tuesday, March 18th, 2008, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Published by Tony Sarrecchia

Tony is a freelance writer specializing in humorous essays, current events, and technology. He also likes writing about himself in the third person.  View profile

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Tony Sarrecchia4/11/2008

    No argument here, I left the Republican party because I am uncomfortable with their coziness to the religious right. I look forward to the day when an atheist runs and says--I am an atheist and am still a good and moral person. However, I think Obama has implied his devoutness in speeches and photo ops which brings his religious beliefs and teaching into question.

  • Tony Sarrecchia4/10/2008

    Hello Chester, thanks for commenting. With all due respect to Ms. Roosevelt, when it comes to time to discuss the future of the country, the person cannot be separated from their ideas. I am ready to discuss and concrete concepts about race--but it has to be a discussion, not a lecture. Obama's speech never speaks of concrete concepts, only vague 'we need to discuss race'. Most of his speeches center around the 'fluff' rather than the concept. In general,however, liberals and conservatives are not as far apart as either side likes to think.

    Hi Lynette, thanks for stopping by. Just because the last 8 years have been less than successful doesn't mean we jump aboard something new without doing our homework. If Wright has been Obama's spiritual mentor for 20 years, then I would have to question the base of Obama's spirituality and effects on his future decision making processes.

  • Lynette4/7/2008

    Senator Obama is a good, decent man who loves his God, family and country. I don't see how anyone can say the last 8 years have been anything less than a overwhelming disaster of Biblical proportions. We need a change. McCain would be four more years of dispair. Clinton, while highly qualified and who would make a fine president, cannot get elected. I don't know why so many Americans despise her so but they do and they would probably vote for Alfred E. Neuman or Richard Nixon's corpse before they voted for her. Barack Obama is the best hope we have to restore America's standing in the world, to stop the government handouts to the oil companies and other corporations and to begin the healing our country so desperately needs. Reverend Wright is an idiot but he's not running for president; Obama is and Barack Obama is the best choice we have.

  • Marc4/4/2008

    Great article! I just take offense to the Bruce Willis comment.

  • Tony Sarrecchia4/3/2008

    AH, that's pretty funny coming from an anonymous poster.

  • AH4/3/2008

    Got your white pointy hooded robes in the closet?

  • Richard Davis4/3/2008

    Good article! Like all good liberals, all Obama can do is obsess on race. Like all good Chicago politicians, he is doing the flim flam thank you ma'am, and hoping nobody will notice. It worked well for him here, where he was full of sound and fury, and said.... nothing.

  • ALBAN MEHLING4/2/2008

    Interesting observations. Thank You fer sharin'. Mizpah. ;-}}>

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.