Take NBC for example. According to the L.A. Times NBC ranks 4th among the major television networks. This does not put NBC in the best position to negotiate. Yet NBC wants to increase the wholesale price of its content. Then there's the New York Times piece stating that Univeral Music Group who, among others, has pushed for a variable pricing scheme that would charge more for newer music, has decided to end its previous deal with iTunes and opting instead to sell its content on an "at will" basis. Why don't these companies get it? Consumers are thrilled at the current pricing on iTunes which is born out by the iLounge.com report which declares that iTunes is now the 3rd largest music retailer.
But the bigger issue in this whole debate is why are television companies getting greedy and pushing iTunes to adopt a different price point model than what we are currently getting? Furthermore why is variable pricing all the rage? Television companies do not seem to mind that video rental stores such as Blockbuster have a fixed pricing model when it comes to video rental. Furthermore Netflix also has a fixed pricing model (depending on which package you go with). But in either case whether you check out last season's Heroes or a classic show like Knight Rider, your cost is always the same. It seems that NBC is trying to take a bigger bite of the apple (no pun intended) than it deserves. And what about NBC's low ranking? Traditionally re-negotiating in any segment of business, from contracts down to employee pay raises, requires validation of the reasons for re-negotiation. An employee does not demand a pay raise bases solely on the fact that he just wants more money. He must make the case that he has reduced waste or improved overall output. Or he must prove that he has somehow gone over and above the call of duty to put out the best product possible. Coming from a defense contracting background, I understand the importance of pointing to past performance as the basis for future contract negotiation. A company wishing to place a bid for a contract must prove its worth. The bidding company must show the soliciting potential client that it can outperform its rivals and offer a superior product while still giving the potential customer the best value. Regardless of which of these analogies you apply to Apple and NBC's current situation, it is clear that NBC is not in a position to drive such a hard bargain.
Universal Music Group and any other music company that tries to pull the same stunt is going to basically be cutting off their own nose. The ubiquity of the iPod/iTunes platform dictates that music companies should be doing all they can to play nice with Apple. Apple continues to make strides with its iPod line and the iPod will be king for many years to come. Content providers need to wake up to this fact and begin to make sound business decisions based on this fact.
Published by Josh H.
I am a college graduate with a degree in Business & Information Technology. I enjoy writing, blogging, giving advice on technology, watching LOST, and studying the Bible. View profile
- Differences Between the New York Times & NewsdayThis article explains the differences in reporting between The New York Times and Newsday.
- Liberal New York Times Writer Fails in His Opinion of the Bush 2008 Stimulus Plan A liberal New York Times opinion writer is against the 2008 tax stimulus plan. His opinion of the stimulus plan is wrong and his idea of what America needs is ignorant and may hurt the democrats.
- Analysis of Nicholas Kristof's Writing for the New York TimesMost of Nicholas Kristof's 2006 editorial articles for the New York Times deal with similar topics of poverty and misfortune in Africa, simply because Kristof was in Niger at the time, and could write about his experi...
- Plagiarism in The New York Times: The Jayson Blair CaseA critical at the New York Times' handling of the Jayson Blair plagiarism scandal.
- Washington Bureau Chief for New York Times Defends Printing "Secrets"In december, 2005, the New York Times ran a sotry regarding wire-tapping by the National Security Adminsitration. Many called it a breach of national security. Philip Taubman defends the decision and explains it.
- Corey Lidle Told the New York Times that His Cirrus SR20 Plane was Safe
- The New York Times and Iran-Contra
- Apple Vs. Apple: What the Beatles Recordings Holder's Claim that ITunes Violates 1...
- Will Shortz: A Tale of a New York Times Puzzle Maker
- Alliance for Quality of Nursing Home Care Refutes New York Times Story
- New York Times Arts & Leisure Festival is Back
- The New York Times Bashes War Veterans
- Consumers don't want variable pricing on iTunes.
- NBC is "cutting off its nose to spite its face".



