Banners displaying breaking news updates on Kyodo's website indicate that officials don't know which reactor is the source of the radiation leak. The leaking of plutonium indicates presumptive fuel rod damage. Reactor 3 is the only reactor using a plutonium fuel mix called MOX; however, uranium fission creates plutonium as a byproduct, so the other reactors could also be the culprits.
What are the signs to look for in assessing the seriousness of Japan's plutonium contamination as this breaking news develops?
Information shared on University of California at Berkeley's Nuclear Engineering Department public forum included Russian guidelines for plutonium exposure. These guidelines set out health risks from different exposures.
Health Consequences of Plutonium Exposure
The Russians have published this information on the health consequences of varying levels of plutonium exposure:
* 370 kBq - fatalities during the first year after accident result from acute interstitial pneumonitis;
* 37 kBq...370 kBq - serious deterministic effects including disability caused by pneumosclerosis and high risk of lung cancer;
* 3.7 kBq....37 kBq - long-term lung pathologies;
* < 3.7 kBq - does not lead to reliable defined consequences.
Response to Plutonium Soil Contamination: Russia and USA
This is what the Russian decision-making criteria say about soil contamination with plutonium 239:
If soil contamination with plutonium reaches a density of .2 to .9 MBq m-2, permanent or temporary relocation is required. The document says that comparable U.S. guidelines call for permanent or temporary relocation at .22 MBq m-2.
Sheltering is called for if concentrations reach .008 to .09, whereas U.S. sheltering is triggered by a level of 2.2.
Russians take urgent protective actions when levels are between 10 and 70, whereas the United States mandates such actions when the concentration hits 22 MBq m-2.
As the situation develops, Japan will need to decide whether precautions are necessary to protect residents from plutonium exposure.
Published by Carol Bengle Gilbert - Featured Contributor in Travel and Lifestyle
2010 Yahoo! Outstanding Contributor of the Year, Carol has consistently been designated a Top 100 Yahoo! Contributor Network writer. She received a 2008 People's Media Award for "Best Article." Carol’s pr... View profile
- The Dangerous Side of Nuclear Power PlantsHow Clean is Nuclear Power? What are the risks of nuclear power plants? Have there been nuclear power plant accidents? Read this article to explore the answers to these questions.
- Nuclear Power: Safe for the Environment?There are many controversies about whether nuclear power is really safe for the environment or not. First look will be at the alternatives in America's power supplies: coal, natural gas, and oil. They are not environm...
- Why Nuclear Energy Should Not Be Considered ToxicProvides analysis of reasons why nuclear energy should not be considered dangerous and looks at examples of how we can avoid a nuclear diaster in the future while making use of the clean power nuclear can generate.
- French Nuclear Testing in Algeria and the South Pacific: The Role of Colonialism i...This paper analyzes the role of colonialism in the production of WMDs by focusing on the case of French nuclear weapon testing in Algeria and the South Pacific (1950's-1990's).
Nuclear Reactors: Learn All About the Controversial Energy ProvidersNuclear reactors are a topic on the fiercly debated topic about electricity and how we generate it.
- Broken Arrows and Nuclear Weapons Accidents
- Shame on Hamden, Tainted Soil Still, Tainted Students
- Frisco Lead Soil Survey Results Released by EPA
- Nation with Largest Nuclear Power
- The Half Life of Grief is Too Long
- Facebook : Social Network or Social Monitor?
- Human Evolution and Climate Change




