Frankly, I knew exactly what she meant. She was referring to precipitation -- to water falling from the sky. There was nothing ambiguous about her simple comment. I stirred from a deep sleep and looked outside our bedroom window. The sky was gray and a steady rain was pouring down indeed.
As far as I'm concerned, specific words mean specific things.
Which is why I can't understand why Texas minister John Hagee -- or anyone else, for that matter -- can possibly say with a straight face that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah. If words mean anything, and they do, Jesus repeatedly made it clear that He was the Annointed One of God...the Messiah, the Christ, the Savior of the world.
Frankly, on that point there is no ambiguity whatsoever. The New Testament is unmistakably clear as to the identity of Jesus -- particularly in reference to what He said about Himself. Consider just a few passages from the Gospels:
In John 10:24-25, we read the following: "Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly. Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me."
Note the remark that some of Israel's religious leaders made to Jesus -- "If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly." Note also how Jesus replied -- "I told you, and ye believed not."
If words mean anything, some Jewish religionists wanted Jesus to tell them whether He was the Messiah. And He told them that He'd already told them. The problem, He added, was that they didn't believe Him.
Then -- as now -- the problem for those who rejected Jesus' claims to Messiahship was not one of confusion, but of unbelief.
Moreover, in examining the above-mentioned passage carefully, there is another important detail in Jesus' words. He speaks of His "works" -- and says that these "bear witness of me." His works refer to His deeds. Hagee says that Jesus did not claim to be Messiah in words or by deeds. But Jesus said that His works -- His deeds -- bore witness to His identity.
What was Jesus talking about? He was alluding to His miracles. His miracles (His works, deeds) served notice that He was no ordinary man. He was the Annointed One of God, as proven by His ability to perform deeds that transcended the laws of nature.
One of the titles for the Messiah is "Son of Man." It was Jesus' favorite self-designation. The term means that Jesus represents all of humanity. He is not a son of man, but THE Son of Man -- the one who came to earth to represent and lead us. The title indicates authority over all of mankind.
That proof that Jesus IS the Son of Man is that He performed mighty, miraculous deeds. And least that's what Jesus Himself said. And in my mind, those words mean something. What other conclusion could possibly be drawn from Matthew 9:5-7:
"For which is easier: to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house? But that ye may know that the Son of Man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy), Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. And he arose, and departed to his house."
Here, Jesus healed a paralytic. Jesus knew that those who were watching did not believe He was the Messiah. He pointed out that anyone can easily say to another, "Your sins are forgiven." But to physically heal that person of a serious infirmity -- now that's another story altogether.
Bottom line: How could the people know that Jesus really did have the authority to forgive sins -- that He really was the Messiah, the Son of Man? Answer: by observing His miracle-working power. In other words, His mighty deeds confirmed His Messiahship.
In the four Gospels -- Matthew, Mark, Luke and John -- Jesus by word and deed affirms that He is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.
That is why He performed so many miracles over a three-and-a-half-year period. In doing so, He removed all reasonable doubt as to who He was...and who He claimed to be.
That is also why He made use of striking statements such as the "I Am" sayings in the Gospel of John. The phrase "I Am" was a direct claim to divinity. In the Old Testament, "I Am" was the Name by which God revealed Himself to Moses, as recorded in Exodus 3:13-14.
As the unique Son of God and possessor of deity Himself, Jesus applied the divine title to Himself -- frequently. In John's Gospel, Jesus identified Himself as follows:
"I am the Bread of Life" (6:35). "I am the Light of the world" (8:12). "I am the door of the sheep" (10:7). "I am the Good Shepherd" (10:11). "I am the resurrection and the life" (11:25). "I am the way, the truth and the life" (14:6). "I am the true vine" (John 15:5).
Even more startlingly, He made this powerful pronouncement in John 8:58 -- "Before Abraham was, I Am." Abraham lived more than 2,000 years before Jesus. Yet Jesus told a group of religious opponents one day that before Abraham existed, He, Jesus, was the "I Am." In other words, Jesus claimed divinity, and divinity was one of the qualifications and prerequisities of the Messiah.
In the Old Testament book of Isaiah, the Messiah who was to come was described this way: "...His name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace" (9:6). Those words are more than beautiful lyrics in Handel's Messiah. They are words that tell of Messiah's nature and origin. He was/is no mere man -- He was/is the Mighty God: God in flesh.
In the First Century, there were people who somehow imagined that Jesus' words and deeds failed to establish He was the Messiah. And the same is true today. For whatever reason, those people, whether ancient or modern, simply aren't paying attention.
Published by eightyone
Became a believer at the age of 21, while in my third year in college. I read the Old Testament book of Proverbs and it spoke to my heart like nothing else ever had. Then I read the four gospels of the New... View profile
- Comparison of Jesus and MuhammadThis paper explores and contrasts the aspects of Jesus and Muhammad.
The Genealogies of Jesus - Contradictory or Complementary?I have heard some people make mention of the fact that Jesus seems to have two genealogies, which are mentioned in two of the books of the Gospels. These individuals declare tha...- Jesus was a Rich Man: Analyzing Jesus' Financial WealthThe prosperity gospel has made a comeback now the excessively rich evangelists are popular, and they claim Jesus as their model, saying Jesus was rich and popular (despite any biblical evidence)
- Senator McCain Proudly Accepts Endorsement of Pastor John HageeThis is an editorial exposing the endorsement pursed by Senator McCain from Pastor John Hagee.
Has the Name of the Messiah Been Revealed in This Age?I hold the belief that something will happen and the name of the messiah will be discovered. I also believe that when it is revealed, it will be incontrovertible.
- Pastor John Hagee Says Jesus Did Not Come to Be Messiah
- Jesus Christ: The True Messiah
- Forget the Stereotypes: This is Christianity
- Are the Jews Missing Jesus the Messiah in Isaiah Chapter 53?
- A Return to Leaving the Mormon Church:
- How You Can Use the Bible, and Your Own Intellect, to Dissuade Yourself from Chris...
- Is Christmas About Jesus Christ or Buying Gifts?




2 Comments
Post a CommentJesus never stated that he was the Son of G-d. He spoke in parables. He always left room for conjecture. Not once did he say he was G-d. He was intentionally ambiguous.
1) JESUS DID NOT FULFILL THE MESSIANIC PROPHECIES
What is the Messiah supposed to accomplish? The Bible says that he will:
A. Build the Third Temple (Ezekiel 37:26-28).
B. Gather all Jews back to the Land of Israel (Isaiah 43:5-6).
C. Usher in an era of world peace, and end all hatred, oppression, suffering and disease. As it says: "Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall man learn war anymore." (Isaiah 2:4)
D. Spread universal knowledge of the God of Israel, which will unite humanity as one. As it says: "God will be King over all the world -- on that day, God will be One and His Name will be One" (Zechariah 14:9).
The historical fact is that Jesus fulfilled none of these messianic prophecies.
Christians counter that Jesus will fulfill these in the Second Coming,
The Gospels were written long after Jesus's death (if Jesus existed at all). Nothing of him was recorded during his time. So maybe Jesus (if he existed) said he was the Messiah, maybe not. Probably not. If he did say he was the son of "god", he was either delusional or a liar, or perhaps he was honestly mistaken. He may have performed feats that seemed like miracles to the people of 2000 years ago. The Gospels, including the Gnostic Gospels, are rife with contradiction, and the early Church was responsible for selecting the material you've read. (As well as slaughtering millions of innocents).