Jesus , the Last Supper and King Arthur

The Tomb of Christ Documentary: International Controversies Examined

The Bard School of Thought
The Bard School of Thought, Yahoo! Contributor Network
Mar 29, 2007 "Share your voice on Yahoo! websites. Start Here."
There are so many theories around these days about the death of Jesus, where and when he died? If he did die on the cross? whether or not he had children with Mary Magdalene?

Who knows what to believe anymore.

My own theory of the death of Jesus is quite different however, for it may be true to say that Leonardo Da Vinci's painting of the last supper does reveal information concerning what really happened.

As you look at the painting of the last supper, the last man standing to the left is thought to be King Arthur, who, it is thought, was in the holy lands at the time with his knights of the round table (or so it may be thought knights Templas).

Is it possible that the time line of Jesus is out by 400 years?

Is it possible that King Arthur was commissioned by Rome to get Jesus out of the Holy lands and back into Britain, where it is thought that he grew up?

Maybe a lot of what Dan Brown writes about in his book 'The Da Vinci Code is more to the truth than what we think.

Because...

If you look closely at the man on the left of the painting, there above his head embedded in the pillar is the holy grail. The cup of Christ.

Why did Leonardo paint it thus so?

Ah! Controversy...Anon.

Published by The Bard School of Thought

http://twitter.com/DenceActivity THE BARD SCHOOL OF THOUGHT The Musings of the Bard The Bard School for Students of the Bard Jack and the Bards Talk... Bard Art.  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • jake4/23/2009

    Please read this book (Jesus, the Last of the Pharaohs) by Ralph Ellis and you will learn that Jesus WAS King Arthur and the bible is not what we have been taught and Jesus certainly wasn't who we have been led to think he was. This is one of the best written and researched books I have read and the bible finally starts to make sense. The ancient writings of other historians, especially Josephus was the key to unlock the truth, which is rather frightening. You can read the bulk of this book here:

    http://books.google.com/books?id=SmusEB_O-7MC&dq=Jesus,+last+of+the+pharoahs&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=dqeuhDUywg&sig=-CVLhHlVTymW0i-jyrHauP37_4Y&hl=en&ei=oJfuSa7qFo-UMemHxfQP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7#PPA178,M1

  • Remus Giger3/29/2007

    Having read this I feel I should comment. It is a curious hypothesis that draws more comparison with Dan Brown's sense of fantasy than his sense of historical reality, although there is a distinct lack of definition between the two.

    To begin with it is rather important to point out that there is no evidence of a 'King' Arthur actually existing let alone the Knights of the round table. Not that this should matter because despite what Christians tell you there is no archaeological or historical evidence for Jesus either. Apart from the Gospels in the New Testament, which are widely believed to have been written anything from 30-80 years after Jesus lived, there is no mention of him by any of the writers of the time. There is no direct reference to Jesus in the Dead Sea scrolls or by inference anyone approaching his character, unless, of course, we assume Jesus was a totally different type of man, but that is another discussion.

    Arthur (for there is no mention of him being a King

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.