He concluded that it is impossible to predict what the future may hold and it is then impossible to prepare completely for some civilization years later in which the child will find themselves. This means that all children must be able to adjust to changing conditions and then must rely heavily on the child's own ability and "powers" to adapt. He felt that the individual must be educated as a social individual and form a bond in the total union. He felt that education must start with the psychological nature of the child's capacities, interests, and habits and controlled at every point by reference to the psychological considerations.
He considered school a social institution and should become a community and that education is a process of living and preparation for future living. The school should represent real life although in a reduced and simplified manner. He felt that the child should grow from the social framework at home and school. He felt that activities at home and school should reflect the activities that the child will encounter later in life.
He felt that the teacher should not impose ideas, but rather to select the influences which affect the child. He felt that the discipline of the school should come from life as a whole and not from the teacher. He felt that examinations only served to identify areas needing help and to reveal abilities. He felt that the social nature of the child required the more intense consideration because the child would have to interact with the society each and every day of their life, but would not have to interact with each subject in the curriculum on a daily basis.
His philosophy concluded that many subject areas do not sufficiently link the subject into the framework of society and as such have an incomplete approach toward that content area. and that the active side of nature preceds the passive side of natural development. He felt that the interests of the child are leading the educational process in a direction of self-empowerment for the child that if developed could lead toward a life-long educational commitment.
He felt that education changes lives and leads toward social progress and reform.
Pre-teachers may want to review many more aspects of John Dewey's philosophy of education as they try to develop their own personal philosophy and should also review the philosophy of other great leaders in the field of education.
Published by Doctorn
A science, computer, and guitar nerd with over 30 years in the field of education with experience teaching at the elementary through college levels. View profile
- Saving The Economy Through Arts EducationAs the idea of work changes, and the economy faces new challenges, can we find solutions through Arts Education?
- Free Online Education for EntrepreneursIf you want to start your own entrepreneur business, but don't have a formal education, you can find everything you need online for free.
- The Plight of Education in the United StatesHaving spent 15 years in education, I understand the frustrations it faces. However, laying the blame at anyone's feet won't solve the issue. Only combined efforts of all those involved can achieve the needed changes.
- Education is Tops at Minnesota Universities and CollegesStudents of Minnesota universities and colleges are provided with a truly well-rounded and respected education. Take control of your education, and your future, by enrolling in one of the Minnesota universities and co...
- The Defining Features of Modern PhilosophyWhat we now call "modern philosophy" arose in the early seventeenth century, in express opposition to scholastic philosophy. But what distinguishes modern philosophy from its predecessors? Four points are key to note.
- A Few Words with Rapper Pigeon John
- John Lennon and the Beatles Covered in Avalanche of New Books
- Philosophy Old Fashioned Lemonade Shampoo, Shower Gel and Bubble Bath
- John Kerry's October Surprise
- John Kerry's October Surprise
- It is a Good Thing Elton John is Not in Charge!
- Is Online Education a Scam



