John Kerry Strikes Again

Don Lee
As a Viet Nam veteran, I have nothing but respect for our military and nothing but contempt for a traitor like John Kerry. I read a blog by S.L. Bradish suggesting that Kerry should be impeached for his recent remarks in Switzerland. Does Kerry only open his mouth to change feet, or what?

Reasons to Impeach John Kerry

Reason Number One

His behavior after Viet Nam would have been cause for execution in any other war. He went to have "private meetings" with the North Viet Namese government, pretending to represent the United States. For that alone, he should never have been elected and impeachment would rectify a terrible mistake.

Reasons to Impeach John Kerry

Reason Number Two

His "failed joke" about American soldiers being poor students to get "stuck in Iraq" showed complete disregard for our military. Being a member of the Senate, I would expect him to support our troops.

Reasons to Impeach John Kerry

Reason Number Three

Every time he makes a divisive remark and puts his country down (especially in another country) he gives "aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war." They love hearing him go on about what an awful country we have and how bad we are. It makes them feel like they have a chance to win in the end. It inspires them to fight harder and kill more of us.

Reasons to Impeach John Kerry

Reason Number Four

The recent comment he made about "Americans seeing other countries through an American lens." In the blog I read, S.L. Bradish seemed to think he was talking about freedom. It makes sense, too. Americans assume that everyone wants to be free. Bradish used the example of slave owners and politicians (Democrats, of course) saying that slaves didn't want to be free and couldn't handle it. They needed their "massas" to take care of them. Kerry sounded like he thought the Iraqis needed Sadam to "take care of them" and wouldn't know what to do with freedom. His position on the war makes more sense if you look at it that way. He obviously doesn't give a rats ass about the troops, so wanting to cut and run isn't something that takes the troops into consideration. The only other reason I can think of is that he thinks the Iraqis don't need freedom. His way of thinking belongs in the pre-Civil War south and not in the world of today.

Reasons to Impeach John Kerry

Reason Number Five

His repeated suggestions that the US should be governed by "consensus" and follow the "European lead" in our international dealings is a betrayal of US sovereignty. Instead of being the United States of America, he appears to want us to become a satellite of Europe. Had he been elected to the presidency, he would have undoubtedly sold us out by now. Probably to France, his favorite country. As a Senator he is in the position of power that could bring about such a disastrous change.

In conclusion, I (and all our military through the years) fought wars to keep our freedom and freedom of speech. We didn't fight and bleed and die so someone like John Kerry could sell us out and commit treason at will. If the voters in Mass. Had a drop of sense, they wouldn't have elected him in the first place and surely not have kept him in office all these years. If they won't get rid of him, maybe impeachment is the best answer.

Published by Don Lee

I'm a truck driver and cover most of the USA. My laptop is always near at hand so I can write whenever possible.  View profile

12 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Don Lee2/20/2007

    Jeff, Bush didn't get called up for Viet Nam. He wasn't a draft dodger like Clinton. He has done nothing to qualify him as a "war criminal". Kerry did give aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war... that's treason, Jeff. And don't confuse "blind allegiance" with common sense. If we don't stop the terrorists there, they'll be coming here again. Failure should not be an option.

  • Jeff Musall2/19/2007

    Kerry expressed his views about Vietnam, views shared by many. Bush skipped service..and now that he is (?) "president" he is, by definition, a war criminal. Thomas Jefferson said "dissent is the highest form of patriotism" and I agree...I would also add that blind allegiance to the failed policies of the most disgraceful president this country has ever had is not patriotism..

  • Heather B.2/11/2007

    Thank you for clarifying. I agree with you for the most part about Kerry, but my opinion on Bush is only slightly better. I don't think it's unfortunate at all, however, to disagree or disapprove of a president. Everyone has flaws, and acknowledging them is the first step to becoming a better person. :)

  • Don Lee2/9/2007

    Heather, maybe I didn't make myself quite clear enough in some areas. I understand that the terrorists use human shields and we do go through them. I also understand that not every bomb takes out only it's targets. My point was that the majority of covilian casualties are cause by the terrorists with their suicide bombings, and car bombs, etc. I meant every word about Kerry, and I was speaking for myself. Your opinions of the President are unfortunate.

  • Heather B.2/8/2007

    --lets the PEOPLE make the decisions FOR the people is the same as wanting us to be a satellite of Europe. I agree with you about Kerry; I don't like the man. But a lot of your arguments are flawed and are nothing but propaganda. If you are going to speak, be completely honest, and don't twist things into something they aren't or assign blame in one place where its due but not another. I personally don't like Bush either; he was given documents stating that 30% of the people felt there were WMD there, and the other 70% said they were probably gone. We haven't found any; that majority was right, yet he exaggerated the minority opinion to get a war to seek WMDs that had obviously long been given away, sold, or destroyed. Bush can't even speak English for goodness sakes....so it's understandable that he wouldn't understand that 70% is higher than 30%, I guess.

  • Heather B.2/8/2007

    Excuse me. I'm a military wife. Many of my husband's comrades have been to Iraq and Afghanistan, and I can tell you: we do kill innocent Iraqi's. These terrorists are so evil that they will use women and children to get close to our troops to do them harm. I have heard of soldiers being ordered to shoot anyone of any age who comes within a certain distance from them. How many innocents do you think died when we bombed Baghdad? Please do not make the assumption that the insurgents and terrorists are the only ones that ever harm innocent civilians. In nearly every major war, we have caused civilian casualties; troops have even been ordered to kill innocents before. Our troops are amazing men who cannot be blamed for the orders handed down to them by their superior. We should support them. But to act as if our military is perfect and completely innocent is a sham. While I agree with you overall about Kerry, I don't agree that feeling we should lead by the example of another country who le

  • Don Lee2/6/2007

    One more thing, Forrest. The terrorists are the ones killing innocent Iraqis. We aren't. Ever hear of suicide bombers? I.E.D.s? Rocket grenades? Insurrectionists who take credit for bombing schools, hospitals and crowded markets? Maybe it isn't just your memory that doesn't work. Have you had your hearing checked lately?

  • Don Lee2/6/2007

    Have another glass of Kool Aid, Forrest. If Bush lied about WMDs, so did the UK, UN, Clinton, Israel, and all the Iraqi citizens he killed with his WMDs. Do you have memory problems in other areas as well? Maybe you should see a doctor. Kerry went to Viet Nam with photographers for publicity. Ask the Swift Boat Vets for Truth. Kerry committed treason by meeting privately with the North Viet Namese, lying to congress, and causing damage to American troops. It's public record, Forrest.

  • Forrest Freeman2/6/2007

    Kerry served, just as you did, for our country. He should be honored for that. You Bush backers are all for free speech until someone says something you don't like. Hoby's right, Bush Jr. should be impeached. Ousting Sadaam is wonderful, but killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi's and bombing highly populated civilian areas is not so great. Bush has botched the war on terror and damaged our reputation in the process. By the way, Bush lied, no escaping that, WMD's?

  • Don Lee2/6/2007

    Honestly, Youranter, I don't know if a senator can be impeached or not. I know that judges can. As for you, Hoby, try to keep things straight. Bush did nothing illegal and he didn't lie to anyone. Saddam violated human rights and Bush stopped him. Maybe you call freeing 25 million Iraqis a war crime, but no one in their right mind does. Kerry is guilty of treason for giving "aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war."

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.