9 'Why have you despised the word of the LORD by doing evil in His sight? You have struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword, have taken his wife to be your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the sons of Ammon.
10 'Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Me and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife.'
11 "Thus says the LORD, 'Behold, I will raise up evil against you from your own household; I will even take your wives before your eyes and give them to your companion, and he will lie with your wives in broad daylight.
12 'Indeed you did it secretly, but I will do this thing before all Israel, and under the sun.'"
13 Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD." And Nathan said to David, "The LORD also has taken away your sin; you shall not die.
14 "However, because by this deed you have given occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born to you shall surely die."
15 So Nathan went to his house. Then the LORD struck the child that Uriah's widow bore to David, so that he was very sick.
What David did was wrong on many levels. The Lord has designed the world so that our choices have consequences. People are not stupid, especially those who knew David best. I believe it was fairly obvious that David had a thing for Bathsheba. When David sent Uriah into an impossible situation, it would not have taken a large leap of logic to figure out what David did, especially, when he subsequently married Bathsheba. David set a bad example for his peers and his family. He set the example of: If you want something or someone it is OK to do what you got to do to get it or them. As a result, the choices of the people around David reflected his example.
Nathan's statement in verses 9-15 reflect the attitude of Israel of how God designed the world. If you sin, God forces bad things to judge your sin. Verses 11&12 state that God would send evil into David's household, He would force David's wives and his companions into sin in order to judge David's sin. Israel and Nathan's attitude goes against the importance of free will in God's economy. Nathan was a prophet, but, he was still a man. A man subject to the misconceptions of his time.
Another misconception, in verses 13-15, David repents, so God spared his life. According to Nathan, the Lord further judged David by killing David and Bathsheba's first child. Killing someone for another's mistake is injustice. We are all precious in his site. God does not kill to judge. His ways are much higher because of the way God designed the system in which we live. You reap what you sow. I believe God may have shown Nathan that the child was going to die. I also believe that Nathan, the man, made the connection between the child's death and judgment on David.
We must be careful how we approach what the Bible contains. I am also a man subject to the misconceptions of his time. Don't just take my word for it. Ask the source of Truth. Ask Jesus.
Do you have a relationship with Him? If not, just ask and begin a relationship today.
Published by Bud Young
I am a father of 2. I am primarily a poet, but I am expanding my abilities to include short stories and devotions. If you would like to know more about me check out the "Being Me" article below. View profile
- The Bible in a Nutshell V: 2nd Samuel, 1st Kings & 2nd KingsIn this series, I promise to give a thorough description of each book in the Bible in 10 sentences or less (as thorough a description as you can fit into 10 sentences-and yes I've stuffed some of the sentences until t...
- The Bible in a Nutshell VIII: Esther & JobIn this series, I promise to give a thorough description of each book in the Bible in 10 sentences or less (as thorough a description as you can fit into 10 sentences-and yes I've stuffed some of the sentences until t...
- The Bible in a Nutshell X: Isaiah, Jeremiah & LamentationsIn this series, I promise to give a thorough description of each book in the Bible in 10 sentences or less (as thorough a description as you can fit into 10 sentences-and yes I've stuffed some of the sentences until t...
- The Bible in a Nutshell XI: Esther, Daniel, and HoseaIn this series, I promise to give a thorough description of each book in the Bible in 10 sentences or less (as thorough a description as you can fit into 10 sentences-and yes I've stuffed some of the sentences until t...
- The Bible in a Nutshell XII: Joel, Amos, Obadiah, & JonahIn this series, I promise to give a thorough description of each book in the Bible in 10 sentences or less (as thorough a description as you can fit into 10 sentences-and yes I've stuffed some of the sentences until t...
- The Life of Samuel Langhorne Clemens
- Literal Interpretation of the Bible: Right or Wrong?
- Back to the Bible?
- The Bible in Public Schools: Constitutional or Unconstitutional?
- Tips for Understanding the Bible
- A First for America...The Koran Replaces the Bible at Congressional Swearing-in Oath!
- The Bible in a Nutshell II: Leviticus, Numbers, & Deuteronomy
- Killing someone for another's sin is injustice.
- We are all precious in God's sight.
- Are we deceived by the misconceptions of our time?





7 Comments
Post a CommentI'm intrigued by your view of there being a difference in the nature of God and the human perspective in the scriptures because God has brought a question to my heart previously about not confusing His Goodness, His Justice, His Mercy and human intrepretation. It seems to me God is repeatedly trying to communicate His Love rather than His Justice and His Son is evidence of His Love triumphing over His Justice. But, I've not heard many others have the same viewpoint. Thanks for writing.
Thank you for your comment Jesse. April, that is very true.
One thing for sure, Yeshuan, God knows how to reach each and every one of us. There are always consequences for our sins. In fact, the sword never did depart from David's house. High price to pay for a little lust and offing her husband, huh?
Interesting article, seems old time bible justice was similar to medieval justice, toss a person in a pond with chains on- they swim they are guilty- they sink they are innocent- catch 22- I liked what you wrote though.
Joy, thank you for your wonderful comment. Because of the way I express myself, my points aren't always clear. I am so glad that you understood one of the points I was trying to make.
Fred, was I judging God's judgment or Nathan's interpretation of events?
Our lives, belong to God anyway. In a sense, when anyone dies, they were "killed' by God. But no one accuses God of murder, or of committing injustice. If God took David and Bathsheba's first child as a part of His judgment on them, then He has that rignt. He takes every one of our lives eventually and no one accuses Him of wrongdoing.
We must be careful anytime we start judging the judgement of God. Taking the baby was, at some level a mercy for the baby--who was spared a lifetime in a seriously dysfunctional family. David's other sons, many of them anyway, fought each other, disrupted the kingdom, and engaged in various jealous rivalries, etc. The fact is, they were sinners, as are we all. If God used their sinfulness--and even gave opportunities for it to be exacerbated as a part of a judgment on David and his household, who are we to say He could not do that?
Let us be careful of thinking that repentance of past sins means we don't suffer consequences from them. Go