Juvenile Hearing for Foster Mother in Lethbridge Case

Charlise Adams-Rogers Faces Termination of Parental Rights

Liz Copeland

Detroit, MI - Charlise Adams-Rogers, the foster mother of Isaac Lethbridge, who was murdered this August in her care, now claims that the injuries that caused his death were an accident.

According to assertions in juvenile court, where she is fighting termination of her parental rights to other children directly related to Isaac's death, she stated that her 12-year-old daughter was throwing Isaac on a mattress on the floor when she missed and he fell onto the floor instead.

Isaac's death was ruled a homicide in August, and the cause of death is listed as multiple blunt force trauma and burns. Adams Rogers' attorney, Marc Shreeman, asserts that Isaac got the burns in the bath, though testimony given by the emergency room pediatrician states that his burns were more likely due to steam or an object, as opposed to scalding with hot liquid.

Isaac had a broken collarbone and bruising on the right side of his head and ear, and bruises on his arms, legs, and left shoulder, as well as burns to his chest and abdomen.

Adams-Rogers states that she was home at the time of his death. Police who arrived on scene didn't get a chance to interview her because she was in the ambulance to ride to Children's Hospital of Michigan, where Isaac was pronounced dead-on-arrival. However, officer Kline testified that there were 4-8 people in the home and that no one shed a tear. He called the behavior of the 12-year-old "odd" and stated that when he arrived she was cleaning the bedroom in which Isaac was found. The officer also testified that she was throwing chicken bones, clothing, and papers into a trash bag, which interfered with the crime scene.

A pediatrician who had seen Isaac on August 4th, and again on August 14th, two days before his death, stated that he had seen bruising on Isaac and had tried to report it to children's protective services, but when he called them the phone just rang repeatedly and no one picked up.

The foster mother asserts that she was getting Isaac tested for a bruising disorder which would make him bruise easily, but the biological family, which has 8 other children, has no history of any type of bruising disorder.Neither Isaac nor his sister had any marks on them when they were taken into care in the fall of 2005.

No charges have yet been filed against any party in connection with Isaac's death. His parents have expressed frustration with the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office and the Detroit Police Department.

Published by Liz Copeland

I'm a freelance writer, DMC mentor, and artisan-level embroiderer. I knit, crochet, sew, quilt, and spin my own yarn as well. I'm an instructor for embroidery and other fiber and textile related crafts.  View profile

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • kathy12/18/2006

    I think the whole thing is ridiculous, and such a sad disgrace on protective services and everyone else involved. How come there hasn't been any arrest made yet!! Especially with the foster mother. She was responsible for the care of Iaasac. To keep him safe in a safe environment. I really find it hard to believe she never saw his bruises or wondered about them, or how he got them. I especially find it hard to believe she never heard his screams! Why wasn't she taking care of him or watching him? Why would she leave them in the care of young, or mentally unstable kids at that? He was just a baby for gods sake. She definately is lying, ot covering up for someone. I am really disappointed in the system that more wasn't done, and that more hasn't been done by now! Why haven't any arrest been made yet? It all just makes me so angry, that poor baby must have gone through a living hell, and everyone that was in that house basically has gotton away with murder!!!!

  • Sara Montrome11/12/2006

    When I read the original article it said that the daughter was making the statements, not the foster mother.

    This is a confusing case and it's even more so when conflicting information is reported.

    Which information is correct?

    I thought the 12 yr old daughter was removed from the home and from the foster mother, so if she is making these statement while not having any contact with the foster mother they could be true. HOWEVER, if the foster mother is making these statements for the child then I would be a lot more inclined to believe they are false.

  • Kathleen Wilson11/5/2006

    When will justice be found. When is somebody going to sweep away the lies and the coverups and find the truth. This nightmare is never ending and it's UNACCEPTABLE. How can the State of MI continue to mollycoddle this woman after the murder of a baby?

  • Erin Bartuska11/5/2006

    Ugh. This whole thing is just so sad.

    I can't believe anyone would give any credibility to this woman's b.s. excuses for a minute.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.