Kagan Banned Military Recruiters from Career Services at Harvard
Supreme Court Nominee Justifies Solomon Law Violation Under "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Opposition
Kagan faced tough questions early from Sessions, questions which seemed to frame the early part of hearings. If Sessions expected Kagan to admit to having made a mistake as Dean of the Harvard Law School, he didn't get one. Kagan made known her dislike of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The issue centered upon the question of Harvard's policy under Kagan with regard to military recruitment on campus.
Harvard's dual policy pre-dated Kagan's stewardship at the Harvard Law School, but Kagan supported it, and amplified it in what Sessions called a "runaround" of Defense Department requests. The Harvard policy allowed recruitment through Harvard's veteran organization but barred the military from access to Career Services. The policy was later reversed to allow the military access to Harvard Career Services, but Kagan took it upon herself to again bar military access to Harvard Career Services after a liberal 3rd circuit federal court ruled the Solomon Amendment was a violation of institutional rights. While the 3rd Circuit federal court impacted some institutions within its jurisdiction, it did not apply in Harvard's 1st District jurisdiction.
The Solomon Amendment was passed by Congress, and withholds federal funds from institutions which bar the military from campus activities such as recruitment. Kagan defended her policy decisions on the basis of her opposition to "don't ask, don't tell," but Sessions pointed out that the nominee went beyond the law in attempting to circumvent Solomon.
Kagan continued to insist that her policies on behalf of demonstrating gay and non-gay students justified her application a policy that ran contrary to Solomon. Sessions countered that Solomon law remained in effect as the case went to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court upheld Solomon, and Kagan huddled with Harvard University President Larry Summers to restore military access to Harvard Career Services. The Kagan-Summers decisions prevented the loss to Harvard of $300 million dollars in taxpayer funding.
Meanwhile, the confirmation committee has been provided with thousands of documents and Kagan emails, many directed against Defense Department military recruitment efforts at Harvard. Sessions pointed out that these objections should have been directed against Congress and the law it passed (Solomon) rather than at the military. Sessions pointed out that, as a consequence of Kagan's policies at Harvard, Iraq and Afghan war veterans had complained of hostility and discrimination on the Harvard campus. Sessions said he was "taken back" by the "tone of your (Kagan's) remarks" in defense of her actions regarding military recruitment at Harvard.
"Your emails refer to military policy but it was a law effectuated by Congress," said Senator Sessions.
Kagan pointed out that her father served in the military and that she was proud of Harvard's veterans and the contributions they had made at Harvard. Her support of a dual policy designed to maintain federal funding and satisfy opponents of "don't ask, don't tell" was not intended to bar the military from recruiting, Kagan told the committee, but only to bar it from Career Services.
Published by Anthony Ventre
I have a background in traditional print media and radio news. The proliferation of online writing opportunities has changed things for me, largely for the better. News moves quickly in the information a... View profile
Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton?Speculation abounds that Hillary Clinton might be selected as the next Supreme Court Justice
California Prop 8 Decision Comes in from California Supreme CourtThe California Supreme Court finally released their Proposition 8 decision, and it entailed upholding a ban on new same sex marriages within the state. The Prop 9 news won't be...- Supreme Court Attorney Adresses Hot Button IssueThis articles speaks of Mark Stancil and his experience trying to defend his client Martin Bustillo in front of the Supreme Court. This details his discussion of how foreign nationals are handled in the United States...
- Supreme Court Deals a Blow to First Amendment with Anti-Terrorism DecisionThe Supreme Court ruled on a decision which cuts right to the core of First Amendment rights and freedom in the Land of the Free.
- Student Job Search: Craigslist Vs. Career ServicesShould students searching for jobs go to craigslist or career services? A closer look at the user experiences of both.
- Can U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan Stand by Her Principles on June 28?
- Questions for Elena Kagan, Supreme Court Nominee
- Reinventing Invention: MyStory to Rhetorical Devices in Electracy
- Supreme Court Rules Second Amendment Gun Rights Apply to States
- Elena Kagan Nominated as Supreme Court Justice by Obama
- Kagan Faces Tough Opposition in Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings
- Supreme Court Appointments Key in Coming Administration

8 Comments
Post a CommentExcellent report. :-)
Just like a leftist - defame and disrespect the very people responsible for their ability to act so un-American. Nice work Anthony.
cheryl, i'm certain there's much more to say than what is in this article...
I was going to write on this, but you took care of it. People singing her praises as a "middle-of-the-road choice" have no idea what they're talking about.
Well written, as always, Anthony :)
Interesting report, cheers
Excellent reporting. Thanks.
Your first paragraph sold me as well as the rest of your article, good job.