Kucinich Watch: Dennis Kucinich Blasts Clinton-Edwards Thoughts
What Did he Say About Chertoff's Warning About Al-Qaeda Attacks?
At the Detroit NAACP forum mikes picked up a whispered conversation initiated by John Edwards in which he suggested to Hillary Clinton that they "should try to have a more serious and a smaller group." Clinton responded, "We've got to cut the number. ... They're not serious." Clinton added that their staff had tried to limit the debates but it got "detoured" and "we've gotta get back to it," according to the AP.
Dennis Kucinich reacted immediately in a press release that "Candidates, no matter how important or influential they perceive themselves to be, do not have and should not have the power to determine who is allowed to speak to the American public and who is not. . . Imperial candidates are as repugnant to the American people and to our Democracy as an imperial President."
Edwards was questioned about his provocative comments while campaigning in Iowa and claimed that what he really meant was not to exclude any candidate, but rather to separate them into two groups chosen randomly so that "we would have a much more serious discussion and people would actually be able to see what the differences are between us." Clinton mumbled something about enjoying the forums and Edwards having "some ideas" about improving their format, basically dismissing the matter as trivial.
Kucinich sent letters to Edwards and Clinton demanding an apology, and added: "If you are truly seeking debates where there are fewer participants and where there is more meaningful and serious discourse, this is a great opportunity for us to join together in an open discussion on behalf of the American people." He also stated in an interview that trying to rig the election, then denying it, reflected a lack of integrity on the part of Edwards.
Ironically, in the 2004 Iowa primary, candidate Dennis Kucinich generously helped increase Edwards' final delegate vote by instructing his own supporters to back Edwards if they didn't meet voting thresholds in the state's precincts. Isn't it nice to know that John Edwards remembers who his friends are?
Meanwhile, back in Washington, Michael Chertoff told The Chicago Tribune on July 11th that he had a "gut feeling" about a new period of increased risk for terrorist attacks this summer and the American people should not be complacent. Chertoff cited increased training activities at the Afghan-Pakistani border and Al-Qaeda's alleged interest in summer strikes. Revealingly, his comments come at a time when support for his bosses is at close to rock bottom because of the Iraq fiasco, which they had initiated by scaring much of the public and most of Congress into believing the fiction that the September 11th Al-Qaeda attacks had something to do with Saddam Hussein.
Dennis Kucinich, on point once again, accused Chertoff of a continuation of a "strategy of deception." He continued, "This Administration is drumming up fear in order to protect its war agenda . . . No evidence has been made public to suggest an attack on the United States this summer, just as there was no evidence that Iraq was harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction."
Readers may recall that one of Chertoff's other dubious claims to fame was his sluggish management of the FEMA response to the Katrina disaster, which caused thousands of people to be stranded in filthy conditions and some to die in New Orleans. Apparently Chertoff's gut feelings failed to kick in at that time to give him any clues about the absolute inevitability of a major hurricane and flood in the area.
Kucinich appealed to his fellow legislators to see through the ruse and do the right thing: "The president is on a mission: To get more money for his war. Congress must also be held accountable and not fall into the Administration's trap. We do not have to fund the war. We have the money to bring the troops home. It does not require a vote. It requires determination and truth."
Unfortunately, determination and truth are becoming harder and harder to come by in what's left of our faltering democracy. Politics now has more to do with how many bucks candidates can suck in to buy themselves power, and how pretty they are. But at least there are still a few honest politicians like Dennis Kucinich, who will never hesitate to speak truth to power, no matter how laughable that may make them in our very cynical times.
Published by Barbara Joan Baxter
Barbara Joan is a freelance writer/editor/publisher/webhead and the proud guardian of ten dogs and cats. Books of poems and a memoir are in the works. View profile
- Can John Edwards Win the Democratic Party Nomination?As long as he remains in the race, Edwards has a shot. Admittedly, it is a long shot, but with Clinton and Obama sniping at each other, Edwards has become the voice of reason in the Democratic Party.
Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich Talks About Impeaching Cheney in...Presidential candidate Congressman Dennis Kucinich held a town hall style meeting in Durham, New Hampshire. The event focused on his efforts to impeach vice president Dick Cheney.
Presidential Hopeful John Edwards Decides the Best Cure is to Keep Running John Edwards is committed to continuing a strong presidential campaign. Elizabeth Edwards has incurred a recurrence of cancer. According to cancer specialist, Dr. Eric Winer of...
Kucinich Watch: Dennis Kucinich on the Ahmadinejad Comment and Health CareTwo more reasons why Dennis Kucinich is the best candidate for president.
Presidential Election 2008: Dennis KucinichThat time is nearing again, that one time every four years where we can make a difference in our country by electing a new leader. There's a lot of candidates who want to be in...
- Barack Obama and John Edwards Tag-Team Hillary Clinton at New Hampshire Democratic...
- The Media Killed John Edwards
- John Edwards Rising in Polls in Iowa
- John Edwards: Cut from the Same Cloth After All
- John Edwards on "Larry King Live": No Vice Presidency
- Who Will Benefit from John Edwards?
- John Edwards Barnstorms Atlanta


3 Comments
Post a CommentAlyce and "A.", I'm sick and tired of Kucinich being virtually ignored by the media--even PBS shows like Washington Week and the McLaughlin Report barely recognize his existence. Alyce, as I recall, Kucinich was against impeaching Bush, his main reason being that Cheney would then take over (not that he doesn't run the country anyway). As far as Bill's crimes, I don't think perjuring himself about his sex life rates up there with other crimes. She should have the right to run for office, no matter what her husband did, on her own merits.
I'm not a huge fan of this guy but he is absolutely dead on. No candidate should be silenced, the people have a right to hear them all and make their own decisions. That's what democracy means, not picking between the "top" candidates. Just because the big guns have "fame" doesn't mean they are the most qualified or that people should have to choose between them alone. Shame on Edwards and Clinton. And shame on the media for not giving the lesser known candidates on both sides a fair shake.
I like this guy, except I think he should have started legislation to censure Bush (first step towards impeachment) the moment GWB's Republican Held Congress declared pre-emptive war on Iraq, making him and them guilty of war crimes. Never heard a whisper when Senator Feingold introduced the legislation. And of course, Cynthia McKinney is out of office, so I guess her impeachment bill died. Personally I think Senator Clinton should be barred from running due to ex Pres Bill's crimes while in office. If she and Edwards get the Dem nomination I will vote for an unknown third party candidate. Corruption at high levels and all of that.