Leadership: Economic Constraints, Votes that Don’t Count

Current analytical economic theory suggests that with each purchase of a product we make an "economic vote" in this regard. This is meant to explain how the best results come out of the competitive interactive forces we have in society. But this is not always the case, monetary control explains only those actions if one has money to use for a vote. Mathematics is without feelings, emotions, or fears; a simply and blindly lead program continuing to follow orders once given. Society is not built this way; we have new ideas presented and innovations accounting for wealth. But we also have economic loss, in this regard our voices are not heard for with loss comes removal of these "monetary voting privileges." This rightly or wrongly cast the "economic votes" to only those with the funds to do them. The rest of society is left without a vote simply because they have to withdraw resources for self-survival sake.

Surveys were conducted late in 2011 stating the upper and middle classes were more interested in the concepts of recycling, this was proven by the amount of funds they spent on such. The true is not they are more interested, it is they had the funds to spend when others are lacking such. The easy which one can spend funds comes with the means to gain them, the fact is the lower classes have been hit hard financially and have lost the confidence in markets, government and employment to the extreme. They too are interested in the many things these others are, but lack the funds to voice the "economic vote" that would secure such. Their voices are held back and restrained by the lack of ability to push the economic forces in a direction they seek most to do.

Governments are supposedly developed to allow the public a means to speak when otherwise could not; to do for them what a single individual has not the ability. But if these current governments were doing such, then why has all this happened? Those in governmental authority are choosing to take actions in their selfish regards, not the represented regards. This lacks the fundamental leadership standards being presented, showing the weakness of this economic theory by not allowing all members of society to "vote" equally.

Thus is presented a condition, those with less funds are removed slowly from any decision(s) in their society. The concept presents a slow erosion of rights and privileges into deep and controlled slavery of the lower financial classes. As they have less privileges they will also have fewer chances to make the needed changes and corrections to secure their lives. Futures lay only at the discretion of others willingness in considering them important, to have value by those who up till then have seen no value in others. Remember we place value in something only by the amount of funds one is willing to pay for it. What then is the value of a human life in the "economic voting" concept…the value of minimal wage or unemployment compensation, both which have been cut. Without the "marginal information" we can not determine this value, as such information does not come at the beginning of life but only through the course of such. Thus when even one voice is silent the society's value is made less.

Today we have many saying they can not trust our own government, large MNC having taken over via executive membership interchanging between the MNCs and governmental positions. The results presented by the public are to either hide or threaten to act with violence. But this comes out as the stressful inequality presented to their rights, the forces in our society caused by the lack of individuals' ability to decide. The lower classes are being pushed out of the economic system; "economic votes" are being removed simply through the lack of political leadership compelling anarchy. The correction to this is simple; the cost of doing not doing these corrections will not be known for generations but none the less will still exist. Yet the political leadership refuses to compensate, to redirect the forces needed to provide means for the lower classes to return to a stable economic life. So if political forces will not take action in your regard, what choices do we as a society have? To die, letting them pick us off one at a time?

There is another choice, to join and combine our abilities into a grouping that does not include those attempting to cancel us out. This they have done by continuing to keep us out of their political agendas, if we combine to take action against them our voices will be heard once more. Last year this proceeded with Arab Spring, Union protest and Occupy Wall Street organizations. Now there are those presenting a preempted strike against Monsanto's future legal actions. By combining now, one can prepare the strategy to ensure future success in the legal battles forthcoming. This results in less ability for opposition to intimidate and less ability to achieve goals. The political forces will still continue, using the lack of financial freedom and inequality. Corruption and violence are the end-results these ideologies are seeking, so more profits come to them short-run.

Contact: Michael Pulse MPulse@truth-things.biz Author of: The Truth of Things

CEO of Stone Rose LLC Profile on Elance: http://mpulse-stone-rose.elance.com