Liberalism is Racism

How Diversity and Multiculturalism Indoctrination in Higher Education Teaches Us to Be Racist Without Calling it Racism

Iago
I can say the following because I am a member of a protected minority (guess which if it is that important to you). I am worried about a part of the political spectrum that claims to be working against racism and yet perpetuates the following ideals:

1. Minorities are socially vulnerable/inferior and thus need the protection of rich white liberals to overcome their social oppression.

2. Minorities require special protection from any offense conceivable. However, this same status does not apply to white honkey, trailer-trash, homophobe, fascist, peckerwood, cracker, redneck males.

3. Class is irrelevant because focusing on class ignores the greater role racism plays in oppression. If white people are disadvantaged, it is their own fault because they are lazy. Non-whites never fail due to laziness, their failure is always due to social oppression from the whites.

4. Only Black professors can teach an African-American studies because no other race understands what it is like not to get a job due to the color of their skin.

5. Black oppression was terrible, however, when they one day become the majority or gain substantial power, they are completely justified in oppressing all non-Blacks at that point in time (to include other minorities, homosexuals, women, etc.)

6. Multiculturalism and Diversity are perfectly acceptable to impose on white students because all history is white history (Swedes, Spaniards, Greeks, Arabs, and Russians all have the same culture and history).

7. Pointing out and dividing people by our superficial differences benefits society. When people are separated along superficial lines, especially when that separation is self imposed, it helps to preserve the native cultures of those who choose to separate themselves - Except whites, when they separate themselves it's due to racism.

8. It is perfectly acceptable for a school to have a Black, Hispanic, Gay, or Asian Pride Club, but no White Pride Clubs! It is unacceptable for white people to have pride in their culture, history, identity, or ethnicity - Any who argue that they should are automatically racist neo-nazi white supremacists.

9. All whites are racist (white heterosexual males especially so) unless they adhere to this dogma.

10. Minorities cannot be racist, as they do not have power. Even when elected to the highest office in the land, they are still subject to the white power structure.

I am sorry I am "racist" for pointing out these hypocrisies. Let the hate mail begin! But NEVER substantive debate.

Fact is, that racism is a tool used by the rich elite to keep poor whites and poor minorities forever locked in a battle amongst themselves, lest they one day join forces and rise up to their TRUE oppressors. Throughout this nation's history, at least 80% of the population has been oppressed by the same rich "liberal" elite that now uses "diversity" and "multiculturalism" and the latest "divide and subjugate" control strategy.

Published by Iago

Born and raised in Colorado. Former Air Force, BA in Political Science. Seeking MBA/MS Finance in the near future. Enjoys discussing fitness/health, finance, history, religion, and politics.  View profile

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Bruce Baker8/4/2011

    Sir, I applaud you. Well thought out and cogent comments, all.

    One point you missed is the cultural slavery that the Liberal, paternalistic attitude behind our social welfare creates in our minority and poor white citizens. People can only do what they're motivated to do. Take away someone's motivation to perform an action, or motivate them to perform some other action that is opposed to that first action, and you've also removed their ability to perform that first action.

    "The American Dream" produces pressure for people to get an education and work hard to better themselves. That's what we tell our poor citizens to do, and we make the argument with words.

    Our social welfare programs send a different message. They tell our poor, "Sit back, relax, and we'll take care of you." They not only send a different message, but use another medium than words. The social welfare programs make their arguments with money. If you didn't already know the answer, which side does plain common sense tell you will win the argument?

  • William Weikart12/16/2010

    Luckily, I don't fall into your category of liberal. I am a leftist and my perspective derives that skin color should be a superficial difference. But the fact remains that 25% of black people earn poverty wages and 8% of white people earn that allotment of income. Wealth, which is a far more important factor in a family's education and work opportunity levels, is far shows far more disparity between races. These are realities and obviously this is not good enough, if one indeed wants to help with what economic privilege they have. Arguments, like yours, are amended versions of anti-Civil Rights progess of what is still socially accepted by reactionary citizens. How would we close this gap, not between only races, but classes? What is your grand plan? What has worked is equitable education and training opportunities, job placement opportunities, and universal healthcare.

  • Randy Inman8/27/2009

    Awesome work!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.