Little Miss Sunshine:The Most Overrated Film of the Year

Kevin Yeoman
As the most overrated film of the year, Little Miss Sunshine stands as the type of film that convincingly integrates the blasé congeniality of independent film/award winner with mainstream fare. Unfortunately predictable and filled with the typicality that is expected with the pseudo-critique of American families that has filled every film of this kind since "American Beauty."

While the cast is amazing and they all deliver stellar performances, which deserve a great amount of praise on both the individual and ensemble levels, it is the end result that dissolves their hard work into a messy mishmash of "all ready seen that" and "I wish that hadn't happened." Stars like Steve Carell, Greg Kinnear, Toni Collette and Alan Arkin all have very distinct, clever characters with...unfortunately, nothing to do. Arkin gets to be the crazy, heroin-sniffing Grandpa; Kinnear is given the permanently and annoyingly up-tempo dad, Collette is given the prototypical mom role and Carell is the suicidal, homosexual, scholarly uncle to the two kids. Paul Dano is the Nietzsche loving, family hating, vow of silence taking; son while Abigail Breslin is Olive, the titular Little Miss Sunshine hopeful.

With all of the creativity that went into the design of these characters, one would think they would all be given something specific to do. Something specific that might have some small relation to why they are the way they are. Instead, writer Michael Ardnt and co-directors Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Ferris, decide to give the characters a set amount of screen time to quickly resolve their issues without any additional conflict thrown in that might deepen either the character development or the film itself. It's like the film was designed as a series of individual vignettes, instead of a whole concept, which then was thrown together for nothing more than a total runtime.

For example, Carell happens to run into the student he was in love with and his new lover at a gas station hundreds of miles away from the city the love affair initially took place. And it just happens to be during the weekend he is forced into a van with his sister's family as they make an impromptu road trip to California. How wacky! The complete lack of effort that went into creating any actual meaning in this film is astonishing. Furthermore, what is it about this movie that necessitates two directors? Perhaps they were there to convince one another that this was actually a good film in the making.

As the film careens to its inevitable conclusion, it becomes overly apparent what it is all about: the triumph of the power of family over the consumptive ferocity that is a ridiculously conforming society. That's right, Little Miss Sunshine is the same film as every other movie about families with wacky members, who, in the end realize they love each other and that's all that matters; how wonderfully unoriginal.

The DVD from Fox comes in the typically horrible fashion the studio is so well known for. Since they simply can't be bothered to release separate Wide and Fullscreen editions of the disc (for those people who still insist on watching a sub-par version of the film) the film's special features are annoyingly spread out on both sides of a single disc. Those features include a commentary by the whole team and one of the songs featured in the film from Devotchka. Then, as if it's a good thing, Fox promotes the fact that there are 4 alternate endings, which means that the filmmakers had no idea how to wrap this thing up and just threw darts at a corkboard to choose the final cut. It doesn't really matter; none of them would have improved the film to any significant degree.

Published by Kevin Yeoman

Kevin Yeoman is a freelance writer for hire with four years of writing and editing experience. He is also adept at non-linear, digital editing and has his own equipment to complete almost any job.  View profile

  • While the cast is amazing and they all deliver stellar performances, which deserve a great amount of praise on both the individual and ensemble levels, it is the end result that dissolves their hard work into a messy mishmash of "all ready seen that" and
  • As the film careens to its inevitable conclusion, it becomes overly apparent what it is all about: the triumph of the power of family over the consumptive ferocity that is a ridiculously conforming society.
  • The DVD from Fox comes in the typically horrible fashion the studio is so well known for.

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • ted lasky1/22/2008

    I thought the same thing the first time I saw this movie. But I've seen it a few more times and it's become one of my favorites. I love Alan Arkin in anything. I think Greg did a very good job. And the part of the gay brother was wonderfully done by a guy used to doing comedy.

    All in all a very enjoyable little effort. Not best picture material, but very, very good.

  • ted lasky1/22/2008

    I thought the same thing the first time I saw this movie. But I've seen it a few more times and it's become one of my favorites. I love Alan Arkin in anything. I think Greg did a very good job. And the part of the gay brother was wonderfully done by a guy used to doing comedy.

    All in all a very enjoyable little effort. Not best picture material, but very, very good.

  • ted lasky1/22/2008

    I thought the same thing the first time I saw this movie. But I've seen it a few more times and it's become one of my favorites. I love Alan Arkin in anything. I think Greg did a very good job. And the part of the gay brother was wonderfully done by a guy used to doing comedy.

    All in all a very enjoyable little effort. Not best picture material, but very, very good.

  • Paul Bright1/31/2007

    I thought it was a very good movie. The family showed love throughout the film, and not just at the end. there were definitely some coincidental things used to drive the plot that I didn't like, but I got the message and enjoyed it anyway.

  • Timothy Sexton1/5/2007

    Thank you! I was prepared to write a similar article after watching it. As you said, the performances are terrific, but as Dorothy Parker infamously noted of Oakland, "There's no 'there' there." And as far as an indictment of exploitation of little girls goes, Donnie Darko accomplished far more with just a few scenes than this movie does in two hours.

  • N. Katers1/4/2007

    I haven't seen Little Miss Sunshine yet because I am gun-shy from hip movies in the past. I hated Lost in Translation (sorry, Bill Murray staring blankly does not make a good movie) and I thought Sideways was one of the most overrated movies ever. But I will probably see it, hoping as usual that it defies my jaded perspective on movies.

  • Steve Hicks1/4/2007

    Interesting article. I thought I was the only one unable to grasp the hipness and coolness of this film. What a waste of a terrific cast. Alan Arkin was completely and utterly miscast, one of my favorite actors diminished by bad writing. This movie is so busy being "indie" it forgot it needed to be good as well.

  • M. M. Lyons1/4/2007

    Ha! I am one of the folks who overrates this film. I absolutely loved it! It's okay, though- your disagreement with my opinion was very well written, and showed solid research and understanding of the topic, so 's all good!

  • Karmatrain1/4/2007

    I agree that Dreamgirls is by far the most overrated movie of the year. Little Miss Sunshine was OK, fairly predictable as most comedies are, but funny and enjoyable nonetheless. The acting was superb and the story was above average and somewhat original even if the ending wasn't.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.