911 Conspiracy Theories in Film
The Loose Change films are filled with theories as to how the attacks were supposedly carried out by the US Government. The main theory in question in the Loose Change film is that the the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition after planes were flown into the World Trade Center. There were several Loose Change film releases, each release being a revision of a previous release. Each of the series of Loose Change films have gone under revision as supposed new information and evidence has become available.
The first Loose Change film claimed that there was a "pod" visible under the fuselage of the aircraft that flew into the south tower to the World Trade Center. The film claims that this "pod" was used to remotely control the flight of the plane into the tower. They also assert in the first film that Flight 93 was shot down over Pennsylvania. The second film asserts that the plan was landed in Cleveland, and the third asserts that flight 93 never crashed in Pennsylvania.
The Loose Change films about 911 were popular viewing across much of the Internet and over a million copies of the DVDs have been sold. The Loose Change film first aired on FOX TV and it also aired around the world on several international television networks.
Criticism of the Loose Change Films
Many people have spoken out against the Loose Change Films, these include scientists, engineers, journalists, and researchers. Even the United States Government got into the act of criticizing the films when it issued an article called "Loose Change Debunked." The article stated that it would have been impossible to carry out a control demolition of the towers based on the conditions that were encountered after the aircraft flew into the towers. The article also makes notes of many of the discrpeancies that occur within the film series in how the facts are presented.
Source: Wikipedia
Published by J.A. McLynne
An information technology professional by trade, I enjoy cooking, reading novels, and refurbishing old computers. I also write on the side to change pace. View profile
- Buxotic Bonanzas and Social Rhetoric: The Life and Films of "B-Movie" Director Rus...The life of famed "b-movie" director Russ Meyer was a turbid one, and his films depict subject matter no less turbid. Despite the focus most play on the large amounts of nudity contained within, them, Meyer's films ca...
From Dirty Harry to Top Film Director: Flags of Our Fathers Marks Eastwo...Flags of Our Fathers, Clint Eastwood's 26th film as director, has just been released and with its glowing reviews it is safe to say that the 76 year old actor-director can be pl...- Films that Hollywood Should Retire from Making AnymoreMovies that are getting redone into complete oblivion
- An Analysis of Ethical Issues in the Film "Jurassic Park"The central ethical dilemma of "Jurassic Park" hinges on the question of whether man should employ his knowledge of genetics to revive a species that had become extinct as a result of natural processes. Mr. Stolyarov...
- World Trade Center Hits You Where it HurtsIf you want to read how Oliver Stone picked himself up and made World Trade Center a film to remember, read on.
- The Worst Films Ever Made, No. 3: Loose Change
- Movie Documentary Loose Change = Loose Screws? What Really Happened on 9/11?
- Great Inventions Courtesy of the United States Government
- An Evolving Democracy: The United States
- The Biggest Money Machine Ever, in World History, is the Government of the United...
- Film Review: O Lucky Man!
- Greg the Bunny from Fox Sitcom Now on DVD (A Compilation of His Short Films)




1 Comments
Post a CommentWe must be careful to not confuse a film maker's imagination or creation with reality... especially if the film maker is perhaps a tad 'loose.'