Low Income Families Losing Ground in Broadband Use

Up to Date Data Released by Pew Study

Timmy Scott
In 2007, 47% of all families used a high speed form of connection at home. The latest survey in 2008 shows that 55 5 of all families are using high speed connection. This is according to the recent release of survey information by the Pew Internet and American Life Project.

However, there are problems, especially with lower income families. Only 25% of families with a base income lower than $20,000 had high speed connections. Last year it was 28%.

Many believe that the poor economy has had a lot to do with the decrease. Families are sacrificing high speed for lower speed in an attempt to save money for other necessitates. Broadband is more expensive than dial up connection service.

Still there are some areas that don't have the ability for broadband yet. Cable is not available in some parts of the country. Cellphone towers have void areas as well.

Here is a look at the survey results. 19% of Americans 65 and older have broadband connections. 70% of 18-29 year old have high speed. Households under the $20,000 25%. Households with income over $100,000 is 85%. 60% of all suburban communities have broadband, while only 38% of the people that live in rural areas have high speed Internet. 28% of non High School graduates have it. 79% of all College graduates have broadband. 58% of all males have high speed access 53% of all females have broadband for use.

The final summary indicates several factors. First those with higher incomes have more broadband use. Second, those individuals with a college education also have a higher use. People that live in more density populated areas also have more broadband use. Lastly, younger individuals are using it more.

Many times younger individuals are more in touch with the new technologies compared with the older citizens. This could be do to several factors. Older individuals are on fixed budgets and they feel secure with what they have. Younger individuals are always looking for faster and more liberal ways to make connections. Higher educated individuals can not only afford to pay for it but, have a better understanding of how it works compared to uneducated individuals.

A good example of the difference in dial up and broadband can be seen in my small town. The difference can be seen economically. I have two sets of friends. Those that have and those that don't. By this, I mean income. The friends that are on fixed income, suffer through with the slow response of dial up. They don't even want to chance it because they are afraid that they will like broadband so much that they will sacrifice other things to use it.

My friends that have the ability to afford it, can't believe that they went so long without it. In some cases however, it wasn't available in their area geographically. In some cases wireless Internet isn't available.

Speaking from experience, I went from a very cheap $9.75 a month for dial up to $34.99 a month for high speed broadband. I have discovered one other thing in the past few months. Since I went to Mozilla firefox Version 3, I have found it to be twice as fast as Internet Explorer. I have not had the opportunity to use Firefox on dial up. I don't even know if it is compatible for dial up. However, I see a big difference in firefox.

One other small area of concern that I often think about is with use of IPods, and cellphones, I often wonder if the wireless systems are getting too much traffic.

Sources; Home Broadband Adoption Survey; 2008

Published by Timmy Scott

I am a guy who is just interested in writing.  View profile

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jamie9/3/2008

    It's funny base things in life like food water shelter are what conservatives want to make sure people receive and get independent enough to supply themselves. Wonderful liberals are concerned with "high speed" internet access
    Typical
    Then again utube is really educational.

  • Timothy Sexton7/25/2008

    No surprise here. Some day, perhaps, every town will follow Gainsville's and San Francisco's lead. Free or low cost access to the internet should be a right, no a privilege. It should be viewed as a tangential right to education. It never will, of course, because the Republicans are fearful of one thing above all: access to knowledge.

  • Kay Whittenhauer7/22/2008

    Internet is getting stupid expensive. Our major city (Rochester) is going to have free wi-fi city-wide, but not county-wide. As a suburbanite, I would like to see it county wide, but that's another subject....

  • Sheri Fresonke Harper7/21/2008

    Interesting article :) Sheri

  • freakmamma7/18/2008

    Very interesting study / report. We were stuck with one provider for a while but when some competition came into the area the prices started dropping as everyone was having pricing wars

  • Pam Gaulin7/18/2008

    Great topic, interesting read!

  • SAIKAT KUMAR DUTTA7/18/2008

    Very informative and interesting article.

  • SAIKAT KUMAR DUTTA7/18/2008

    Very informative and interesting article.

  • Donna Thacker7/16/2008

    I had to have broadband up here in little bitty land! But yes it is expensive, and those really watching budgets will opt for dial up as better than nothing!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.