Male Versus Female President

Kay Pierre
I respect all candidates for running for the presidency because it's a long and costly process. I think that the election process is too costly. I think that money is use unwisely in the election process. Electing a president should be a fair and neat process without too much cost and time being wasted. It may sound funny but I think they can take half of the money that they use in the election and save some children's lives in Africa. Personally, I think that they wasted a lot of time and money in the process. I think that they can still get the same results with less time and money being wasted.

The issue with a male versus a female president is not a difficult one. There have been female presidents in other countries like China and England. They were the queen or emperor. It depends on how the country's political office is arranged. In other country, when someone is a president, they have the last saying for most issues but that's not the case with America. In America, there is a check and balance system and most decisions have to be voted by most representatives. The president in America is more of a representative than a ruler like in other country. Therefore, I think that as long as the president has a good commitment to serving the country then we should be fine. There are many different kinds of intelligence units in the White House advising the president's choice. The president will not get a chance to make decisions that are out of bound. It does help to have a president with great wisdom and knowledge that can execute a really good plan for America.

Men have many strengths comparing to a woman. One of those strength is military and aviation knowledge. Most women would not do that well when waging war with another country and this is one of the responsibility of a president. We are going to war with Iraq and the next president would be taking over this responsibility of continuing or discontinuing the war. The president has to know a great deal in order to make a really sound decision regarding to warfare against other country. They have to be able to wage a winning war if they have to continue the war. A woman will be a weaker link when it comes to warfare than a man. Women are limited in knowledge about ammunition and its usage. I'm not objecting women, but merely stating my observation. The toughest job is better handled by a man. Although, when it comes to many other issues, a woman president will surpass a man president. If there was not war involved in the responsibility of a president, a woman would suffice the role.

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.