Even though the commentary with the poll claims "mixed views," the survey shows remarkable consistency in the main categories:
56 to 37 percent of those polled support allowing Lesbians and Gays to serve openly in the military.
55 to 38 percent do not want their state to allow Lesbian and Gay marriages.
57 to 38 percent support "civil unions."
53 to 40 percent support allowing same-sex couples to adopt children.
It is encouraging that the numbers show more than 50 percent of the respondents support for three of the four areas defined by the poll as "Gay Issues." Still, the opposing percentages are significant. Based on the poll, it is fair to say that these are dynamic issues still very much in a state of change and moving toward more positive attitudes. Such a poll taken 15 or even 10 years ago would probably have been much more negative.
Since President Obama supports lifting the ban on open military service and public opinion is moving toward more support, that issue will probably be resolved in time.
The marriage issue, however, is mired in heavy emotional baggage and irrational fears whipped up by some religious leaders and pandering politicians seeking a "safe" issue.
For better or worse, marriage is both religious and civil. Regardless of the law, various churches will, no doubt, decide the issue based on their own beliefs. It is ridiculous to think that any laws passed in any state, for example, will influence the Pope or the College of Cardinals. It will probably be a good long time before same sex marriages are legitimized and sanctified by the Catholic Church.
It is equally ridiculous and unsupportable to think that allowing Lesbians and Gays to marry will somehow diminish matrimony between heterosexual couples. If the value of marriage depends upon who is excluded from participation, then marriage is already severely diminished.
The laws enacted by the individual states, however, are another matter. Marriage confers upon a couple status and rights not available by any other means. The specific rights and conditions granted by "civil unions" would not be consistent from one state to another and would not necessarily translate as the same or equal benefits conferred upon married couples by the federal government.
In fact, if "civil unions" were intended to confer the all rights, benefits, and status of marriage, what would be the point? Allowing the full benefits of marriage to same sex couples through "civil unions" would then be merely a petulant redundancy. "Civil Unions" only make sense if they specifically deny some benefits of marriage. In every context, the concept of "separate but equal" is always a lie.
In addition, it is profoundly inconsistent to oppose same sex marriage and support adoption of children by same sex couples. This allows the children to have the benefit of parents and a home without the status of family. It is a profoundly contradictory position.
Surely, it is important to grant both those who adopt children and the children they adopt the status, rights, and protections granted to legally recognized families in the United States.
Finally, at the most fundamental level, this poll and any other poll on this issue is utterly irrelevant. Civil rights are not and must not ever be determined by popular opinion and not by vote -- not for women, not for any racial or ethnic group, and not for Lesbians and Gays.
Like it or not, Lesbians and Gays are citizens of this country who hold jobs and pay taxes and vote. Just as all other citizens, they are entitled to all the rights and benefits of citizenship and to all the benefits and protections guaranteed by the Constitution. That surely must include the right to marry, to adopt children, and to enjoy the full status of family in this society.
Published by Sharon Fawley
More than 20 years experience writing ad copy, brochures, newsletters, articles, columns, white papers, opinion-editorials, user documentation, policies, procedures, and more. Background in sales, education... View profile
Miss California vs. Perez Hilton (Video Links) on Same Sex Marriage on M...Miss California, Carrie Prejean was asked her views on same sex marriage by judge Perez Hilton. Her response may have cost her the Miss USA crown
Same Sex Marriage: Divided We FallI remember back on March 7, 2000 when Californians voted yes on Proposition 22. This initiative was to prevent California from recognizing same sex marriage. The proposition sta...
How One Vermont Family Sees the Legalization of Same-Sex MarriageThe State of Vermont legalized same-sex marriage today. How does that effect the average Vermonter and what does it mean for institutions that do not recognized same-gender rel...
Vermont State Senate Approves Same Sex MarriageA Bill to Legalize Same Sex Marriages Was Passed by the Vermont Senate By a Vote of 26-4.- Why Massachusetts Permits Same Sex MarriageIn stodgy New England, there is a less than stodgy law in place in Massachusetts. Why is it that the Bay State leads the way in same sex marriage.
- Gay Marriage Vs. Civil Union
- Gay Marriage Vs. Civil Union: An Argument of Semantics
- Replacing Marriage with Civil Unions in the United States
- Gay Marriage Compared to Civil Rights Movement
- Civil Unions Vs. Marriage: Equality Knows No Exceptions
- Lesbian Ordered to Pay Child Support to Her Former Gay-union Partner
- Gay and Lesbian Bars in Melbourne
- Although the public more accepting of Lesbian and Gay rights, marriage is still a difficult issue.
- "Civil Union" does not offer the same benefits and protections as marriage.
- Lesbian and Gay citizens are entitled to all the rights of citiizenship.

