Tom Perez was disqualified because he was judged, under extremely rigid and unreasonable standards, to have not practiced law in Maryland for the requisite ten years. Though he certainly "practiced" he did not become a member of the Maryland Bar until 2001. Doug Gansler, by contrast, has been a member of the Maryland Bar since 1989, and he went on to become our candidate.
Now, his eligibility is also being challenged in court because his opponent, Scott L. Rolle claims that most of his work was done in D.C.
Gansler claims that this is an act of desperation by a political opponent who is down like 30 points in the polls. I think it's considerably more despicable than that.
You see, in the interests of full disclosure, I joined the Maryland Bar in 1998, and they've been taking dues from me ever since. There are clients trust funds and all manner of "optional but really mandatory opportunities for participation" in the Maryland Bar once you join. And in spite of the fact that I left the profession long ago, I have little doubt that if I ever ended up in court over anything, it'd all be about how I was a Maryland lawyer, etc.
There is really no polite word to describe the idea that a Maryland lawyer who is doing a lot of work in D.C. is not compliant with our requirements, much less unfit to serve as our Attorney General. An unreasonable reading of the law will discouraging good people from seeking office, and make those who have political potential quibble about their professional identity.
The 10 year requirement was a bad idea to begin with. Allowing it to be abused in this manner via technicalities is beyond a joke. It's bad faith and does not serve Maryland's interests.
A pox on Scott Rolle for trying it.
Published by Stephanie Dray
Stephanie Dray is an author of historical fiction. Her debut novel, LILY OF THE NILE, will hit bookstore shelves in January 2011. She's a storyteller, a game designer, and a cat trainer. In a previous life,... View profile
- Assumption of Risk Doctrine Used in Children's Sports Injury CasesA college research paper on the assumption of risk doctrine and how it is applied to children's sports injury cases. The paper seeks to come up with an economically efficient solution.
Supporters March for the Duke University Lacrosse Players in a Walk for...The Duke Lacrosse case has resulted in hurting just about everyone it touches. The friends and families of the Duke Lacrosse players responded by taking a hike.- Thai at Silver Spring Restaurant in Silver Spring, Maryland: ReviewThis restaurant has greatly improved since our initial visit shortly after its opening.
Top Hotels in Baltimore, MarylandLooking for a hotel in Baltimore? There are plenty of options - it all depends on the purpose of your visit. Whether you're in Baltimore for a romantic getaway, a business trip,...
- Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs: The Best of the Worst
- Maryland Bar Exam: General Guide
- Haiti: The Chippewa Church of the Brethren Responds
- U.S. V. Fordice: The Irony of Integration and the Elusive Goal of Equality
- The Top Sports Bars in the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area
- The Impact of County and City-Level Smoking Bans on Bars
- What's it like to Be a Genius?

