Here are some parts of the statement, as reported by RedState. I have bolded what I consider to be important statements:
"Senator Obama has accused me of opposing regulation to avert this crisis. I guess he believes if a lie is big enough and repeated often enough it will be believed. But the truth is I was the one who called at the time for tighter restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that could have helped prevent this crisis from happening in the first place.
"Senator Obama was silent on the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and his Democratic allies in Congress opposed every effort to rein them in. As recently as September of last year he said that subprime loans had been, quote, 'a good idea.' Well, Senator Obama, that 'good idea' has now plunged this country into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
"To hear him talk now, you'd think he'd always opposed the dangerous practices at these institutions. But there is absolutely nothing in his record to suggest he did. He was surely familiar with the people who were creating this problem. The executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have advised him, and he has taken their money for his campaign. He has received more money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than any other senator in history, with the exception of the chairman of the committee overseeing them. Did he ever talk to the executives at Fannie and Freddie about these reckless loans? Did he ever discuss with them the stronger oversight I proposed? If Senator Obama is such a champion of financial regulation, why didn't he support these regulations that could have prevented this crisis in the first place? He won't tell you, but you deserve an answer.
"My opponent has invited serious questioning by announcing a few weeks ago that he would quote - 'take off the gloves.' Since then, whenever I have questioned his policies or his record, he has called me a liar.
"Rather than answer his critics, Senator Obama will try to distract you from noticing that he never answers the serious and legitimate questions he has been asked. But let me reply in the plainest terms I know. I don't need lessons about telling the truth to American people. And were I ever to need any improvement in that regard, I probably wouldn't seek advice from a Chicago politician.
"My opponent's touchiness every time he is questioned about his record should make us only more concerned. For a guy who's already authored two memoirs, he's not exactly an open book. It's as if somehow the usual rules don't apply, and where other candidates have to explain themselves and their records, Senator Obama seems to think he is above all that. Whatever the question, whatever the issue, there's always a back story with Senator Obama. All people want to know is: What has this man ever actually accomplished in government? What does he plan for America? In short: Who is the real Barack Obama? But ask such questions and all you get in response is another barrage of angry insults.
Published by AC Writer
I have very diverse interests and never seem to know what's going to hold my attention at any given time. View profile
The Media and the 2004 Presidential ElectionMedia coverage of the 2004 presidential campaign lacked the intensity to encourage voters and provide them with the necessary information to make an informed voting decision.
2008 Presidential Election: Can This Survey Determine Who You Should Vot...Take a simple survey to find out who you should vote for in the 2008 Presidential Election.
The Victoria Woodhull/Frederick Douglass Ticket in the 1872 U.S. Preside...Woodhull had a unique ability in finding governmental loopholes to throw the status quo into a quandary. In a speech at a convention--Woodhull convinced the all-female audience...- The Presidential Election 2008 - an Already Burned Out TopicThe Presidential Election 2008 will take place on November 4, 2008. That is still more than a year away, yet a lot of people are already tired of hearing about it. Aren't you?
- Presidential Election Survival Guide: Debates, Campaign Commercials and MoreThe presidential election is looming, and this year, has begun earlier than ever before. How do you stay informed without losing your will to vote?
- The Effects of Advertising on Young Voters in the 2004 Presidential Election
- Media Framing of War in the 2004 Presidential Election
- What Happened After the 2000 Presidential Election
- 2008 Presidential Hopefuls: Senator Sam Brownback's Potential Candidacy for the 20...
- George Allen's Potential Candidacy for the 2008 Presidential Election
- George Pataki and Rudy Giuliani's Potential Candidacy for the 2008 Presidential El...
- Clinton/Obama: Breaking the Mold for the 2008 Presidential Election




3 Comments
Post a CommentKelly, did you know that two Obama associates, Franklin Raines and Tim? Johnson headed Fannie and Freddie, and that Raines left because of accounting errors on his watch? And did you know that Obama has received the second most of any senator in donations from Fannie and Freddie, second only to Chris Dodd?
McCain's style is the reason he is losing the election. Who knows where he would be in the polls if he accurately detailed his record and told us precisely where he stands on issues. No matter how you parse it - his chief of staff was being paid by Fannie and Freddie big bucks when Chuck Hagel brought the bill to his committee. He did not even bring it up for vote until a year later and only then did he add his name. And it died. End of story. I just can't abide the way he has run this race. It is a disgrace to our democracy.
It's called politics. Dems blame Reps and Reps blame Dems. When will we ever see that they all say whatever than can to try to get elected. At the end of the day, Obama is a POLITICIAN. At the end of the day, McCain is a POLITICIAN. It's pretty much that simple, folks.