McCain, Obama, Support Wasteful Hybrid Car Bailout Bill for General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford
Better Support for Hybrid and Electric Cars
Voters should consider several things about this huge financial package.
1. What are we trying to accomplish? Should American taxpayers save shareholders? Or improve the environment and the economy for as many people as possible? Cleaner, more efficient hybrid and electric cars, job creation, economic benefits, and an improved international American image can be accomplished by spreading the loans out to smaller companies. Inc. magazine's "Special Report on Innovation" shows the power small companies represent in the U.S. economy.
2. How will car companies use the money? If the United States government lends cash to American automakers, it will let them carry on business as usual. Huge sums of money will go to executives, marketing efforts, and Washington lobbyists. Some money will go to research and development, but there are more efficient, proven ways to spark innovation. American taxpayers will help the car companies and the labor unions they grapple with to continue their costly squabbling. Manny Lopez sorts through the issue in "The Detroit News," September 4, 2008 article, "Car Maker Cuts Must Go Deeper."
3. Are the "Big Three," (General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford), the best agents of change for more efficient transportation? Recent history shows the short-term profit outlook ruling large corporate boardrooms. Smaller, nimble companies are more likely to provide answers to great challenges. The highest hurdle for efficiency improvements does not lie in hybrid car designs. While hybrid car design improvements will bring small increases in efficiency, battery solutions are needed most. All-electric, plug-in technology remains the gold standard. Better batteries will make possible better hybrid cars, plug-in hybrids and all-electric cars, as outlined in Popular Mechanics March, 2007 article on the "Plug-in Challenge - 3 Big Questions for the Electric Car's Future"electric car's future.
4. A proven way to make better hybrid and electric cars for Americans lies in design contests. Cash prizes fuel competitive innovation to bring novel solutions and private funding for technical problems. The X Prize represents the potential with their slogan, Dr. Peter Diamandis explains the advantages of encouraging entrepreneurs to tackle tough development problems. Relatively small low-cost loans to battery companies would support many teams to tackle problems from different angles. While the winner of such a contest could own patent rights for a new battery solution, runners up could be awarded contracts to build batteries under license. These companies located near car factories will create jobs and spread the benefits through communities. Battery company engineers would team with car makers to use the technology with hybrid and all-electric car and truck designs. Small companies fuel our economic engine today. Yankee ingenuity will create batteries for export to the automakers of the world and the jobs to manufacture them. America can solve problems, not just burn resources.
5. Since the 2007 Energy Bill calls for low-cost loans and not a direct cash injection, some critics decry the label, If tax payers are doling out the cash and guaranteeing the lending rate, we are enabling the rescue, whatever it is called. Americans should get their money's worth. Handing the bucks to the creators and marketers of the SUVs sitting on car lots from sea to shining sea will not solve problems. Americans may feel helpless in the energy crisis that faces them. They are not. They bought SUVs and voted for politicians. Stockholders were eager for short-term profits. American car buyers helped create the problem and they can help solve it. Elected officials must feel the heat of America's frustrations. Call, email, and yes, write a letter to those in Washington responsible. Call you car dealer and tell him your next car will be a hybrid car or electric. Cut down on driving that gas guzzler to send a message (and save a few bucks).
Mina Kimes, "Now GM, Chrysler and Ford want a bailout too" CNNMoney.com
Joel Popkin and Company, "The Importance of Small Business to the U.S. Economy" Small Business Notes
Max Chafkin, A.G. Lafley and Ram Charan, Leigh Buchanan, David H. Freedman, "Special Report: Innovation -- Small Business Ideas -- Creative Entrepreneurs" Inc.com
Manny Lopez, "Carmaker cuts must go deeper"The Detroit News
Jim Motavalli, "Plug-in Challenge - 3 Big Questions for the Electric Car's Future" Popular Mechanics.com
Dr. Peter Diamandis, Success!!! Using Economic Engines to open the space frontier | X PRIZE Foundation XPrize.org
Published by Ron Erb
Failure of Bailout Bill Shows Lack of Bipartisanship in Congress to Bene...An editorial about the failed bailout bill and the impact that its failure has on American citizens. - Bailout Bill: Finacial Saviour or Self InterestA short editorial on why many of our elected officials may have voted against the current bailout bill.
- Senate Bailout Bill Has Tax CutsIf it was Nancy Pelosi's purpose to blow up the bailout bill during her partisan speech during the House floor debate, she may be having regrets. The Senate bailout bill will contain some tax cuts that House Democrats...
- Senate Bailout Bill Up for Vote; Citizens Protest, World Leaders Watch and WaitThe Senate takes up the rejected House bailout bill with a host of other legislation appended.
- Senate Bailout Bill: Wooden Arrows, Rum and PorkIn struggling with the liquidity crisis, the United States Senate seems to have found that it goes beyond banks, investment firms, and even generally small business. It seems that, among others, the manufacturers of w...
- Hybrid Cars: What They Mean for Your Future
- What is a Hybrid Car?
- Why I Don't Drive a Hybrid Car
- Shopping for the Best Used Hybrid Cars Without Being Taken to the Cleaners
- Analysis: Bailout Bill and a Report for Readers
- Bailout Bill Defeated in House
- Did Nancy Pelosi's Speech Blow Up the Bailout Bill?




1 Comments
Post a CommentToo much patching up bad American business decisions lately. GM, Ford, etc. should have been developing and building hybrids years ago, so they could compete with Honda, Toyota, etc. But they didn't and our government didn't mandate it and our lax EPA saw no problem with that. Now, because their financial ruin will indeed mean lost jobs and lost industry, we're supposed to funnel more money to them. Well, on the one hand, without industry our economy will continue to tumble - on the other, why isn't their a stipulation that they have to funnel a set amount of their profits right back into our Treasury to repay us AND compensate us as the shareholders we would now be? GM and Ford put their money into lobbying to get out of requirements, not into R&D. Maybe we also need to stem all lobbying money too!