Memoir Fraud: When Nonfiction is Fiction

Publishing Industries, Not Oprah, Should Be Rebuked

Shannon Lausch
As Oprah undoubtedly knows, truth in nonfiction can be subjective, twisted, or entirely absent. "Angel at the Fence," by Herman Rosenblat recently joined the ranks of "A Million Little Pieces" and "Love and Consequences" as Oprah-endorsed memoirs that turned out to be fictitious. This revelation has sparked concern over Oprah's prowess in endorsing books.

It shouldn't-or rather-this factor alone shouldn't. A sad fact is that readers are often helpless in verifying the authenticity of memoirs. With other nonfiction books, a host of resources help alert readers. Think something is amiss? Just look up the sources they used on the Internet or at the library. Or check out the author's credentials. Or judge the logic they're using.

But what's an average reader to do when it comes to memoirs? Track down the author's relatives and friends and interrogate them? Sure, common sense or a sharp BS radar may help. Rosenblat's account of his future wife handing him food through a concentration camp's barrier is what triggered Holocaust scholars to call into question the book's veracity. But many nonfiction books are published on unlikely and extraordinary things happening to people-that's what makes them interesting enough to be published.

Then there's the problem that almost all memoirs possess an element of fiction. They have to. Unless an author has a picture-perfect memory, memoirs would be awfully flat and boring-very little dialogue (who can perfectly recall a conversation?), no intricate descriptions, sketchy details, etc. David Sedaris, a successful and hilarious writer, acknowledges his stories are oftentimes exaggerated for comedic effect but are based on the truth.

Of course, Oprah has more resources than the average reader. After being burned so many times by authors, she will hopefully use her resources to fully check out the author and their claims. But ultimately, it isn't really her job.

One of the most disappointing aspect to come from the faked book memoirs is the publishing industry's ready admittance of fabrication problems without committing to really do anything about it.

In an ABC news article, Publishers Weekly Editor Sara Nelson cites financial difficulty holding back publishers from taking more active steps-even after the Frey fiasco: "There's not enough manpower to check these books and at no point will there be a battalion of fact checkers hired."

But when your industry deals with nonfiction books, fact checkers should be a priority in the budget-not viewed as expendable.

What's disturbing is that there are most likely many more memoirs out there that have been fabricated-either not popular enough to get the scrutiny these other books did or their authors are better at covering the falsehoods.

Until the nonfiction publishers get their priorities straightened out, expect more memoirs to be revealed as fabrications.

Resources:

Friedman, Emily. "Is Oprah's Golden Touch Tarnished?" ABC News. 30 Dec. 2008. http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=6543206&page=1

Zane, J. Peder. "The Naked Truth about Sedaris." PopMatters. 28 Mar. 2007. http://www.popmatters.com/pm/article/the-naked-truth-about-sedaris

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Lisa Curcio3/18/2009

    =)

  • Geannie M. Bastian1/11/2009

    Having taken a course entitled Creative Nonfiction, I'm less than shocked at this. It's thin line. And, no, it's not a reader's job -- any reader, even Oprah -- to fact check for the publisher. If I recommend a book, it's because I like it, not because I've done a background check on the author. Even so, if I were Oprah, I'd stick to Fiction for a while.

  • Patricia Sicilia1/10/2009

    Sorry, as you said, Oprah has the resources to do some real checking. If she's going to endorse something, she should make sure she's not being taken for a ride.

  • Tiffany B.1/9/2009

    Very interesting and great points made.

  • 3lilangels1/9/2009

    very well done here!

  • L.L. Woodard1/8/2009

    I don't hold Oprah responsible for knowing whether a book is in fact factually based or not. The publisher and the author...now that's an entirely different story.

  • Michael Segers1/8/2009

    Great work here... something we need to think about.

  • Roberta Baxter1/8/2009

    a very interesting post. Roberta Baxter

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.