Merck Agrees to Pay $4.85 Billion for Vioxx Claims
Plaintiffs Have Until March 1, 2008 to Enroll in Settlement
Merck & Co, Incorporated is the manufacturer of the drug Vioxx. According to the FDA, Vioxx was approved in May 1999. Merck voluntarily recalled it on September 30, 2004. Merck states that they did so because safety concerns arose in some of the drug trials involving Vioxx. The FDA states that it did not recall the drug because it had not had time to review the data before Merck voluntarily recalled the drug. The New York Times and other news sources reported that the FDA was lax in their over-seeing of the issue and that they might have known earlier that the drug was questionable.
There are conditions for the settlement to be valid and all of the claims will still be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The settlement is not the same as a class action settlement. It will apply only to claims that were filed as of November 8, 2007 or as stated above, those which have been tolled. The first condition of the settlement is three-fold. The claimants must have objective medical evidence of a myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. They must prove that they received at least 30 pills and they must show that they received a sufficient number of the pills within 14 days of the infarction or stroke to satisfy the question of whether or not they could have taken the pills close to the time of the attack. Administrators for the resolution process will determine if the conditions are met. Part of the agreement specifies that Merck will not admit any fault.
The plaintiffs have until March 1, 2208 to enroll in the program and unless 85% in each of the categories enroll, Merck will not be obligated to go through with the settlement. Merck retains the right to extend the date. The settlement only applies to U.S. citizens or those who took the medication and had the heart attacks or ischemic strokes while in the United States. There are other conditions; all of them are detailed on the Merck web site.
According to Merck, payments could be initiated as early as August 2008. The agreement does give Merck the right to end the process at any time and to try the cases individually if all of the agreement's conditions are not met. Merck Senior Vice President Bruce N. Kuhlik states that he feels the agreement is a good one for Merck in that they have set aside approximately $1.9 billion to defend the Vioxx claims since 2004 and that Merck is aware that the litigation could last indefinitely. He also states that the statute of limitations have already expired in almost every state.
The website states that it was the judges in the case who requested that Merck enter into discussions with the plaintiff's representatives and also states that those claimants who do not agree to become part of the settlement will be required by court order to provide certified copies of medical and pharmacy records and the supporting expert opinions "in a timely fashion". According to Merck, it intends to "defend all claims that are not included in the resolution process".
Merck's figures state that as of October 9, 2007, they had been served or named as a defendant in approximately 26,600 lawsuits in the U.S. So far, Merck has won 12 suits and those filing Vioxx claims have won 5 times.
Sources used:
http://www.merck.com/newsroom/press_releases/corporate/2007_1109.html
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2004/NEW01122.html
http://www.freedomofchoiceinhealthcare.ca/Articles/FDA/FDAfailing.doc
Published by Elena H
Experienced Web Writer, Voracious Reader, Christian, Happily Married Wife for 46 yrs, Proud Mom of 2 Adult Sons, Mimi to 3 Wonderful Granddaughters, Great Mother-in-Law, Care-taker of Elderly Mom View profile
- Vioxx and TrasylolAmericas Watchdog and US Drug Watchdog are investigating Vioxx and Trasylol use when less riskier and inexpensive alternative drugs were available.
- Stock Alert: Drug and Pharmaceutical Company Investments with the FDAAs with any investment, there is a downside. This downside became evident when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made another mistake.
Do You Miss Vioxx for Your Pain? Try Devil's ClawDevil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) is a South African native plant used for a sedative and an anti-inflammatory for illnesses such as osteoarthritis and rheumatism. The pla...
Voodoo Medicine - Pharmaceutical Company MerckWhen conducting research on the company, outside of its own website, it is apparent, despite the negative aspects surrounding VIOXX, that overall, Merck's focus on research is c...
Stock Alert: Is Merck Stock a Good Buy?The Vioxx debacle has hit Merck's stock and reputation hard. But is it still a good buy?
- Merck & Company Settles Vioxx Claims for $4.85 Billion
- U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform Praises Merck Decisions About VIOXX Claims
- Merck Pays $650 Million to Settle Fraud/kickback Allegations
- Airborne Lawsuit Settled - Score One for Pharmaceuticals?
- Producer of Vioxx, Merck, May Have Known of Harmful Side Effects
- Vioxx and the Risk of Stroke
- Vioxx: The Silent Killer



9 Comments
Post a CommentThese kinds of things make me sick. I believe these companies anticipate these suits/payouts and consider them into their profit/loss statements even before their drugs go on the market.
Great reporting!
Let's hope the settlement $ gets to those who were truly harmed.
Great article and very informative.
It seems that many prescrition medications these days end up being taken off the market because of deaths and serious complications. I don't like taking anything new. You never know when or if it will be taken off the market because of problems. Seems these companies should spend more time and money on testing rather than promoting medications that end up causing illnesses, deaths, and lawsuits. Great job on this!
Well-reported article, Elena!
Interesting and informative. Great article!
Very informative article!
Thanks for the informative article.