Miami Airport's Concourse D Gates Closed After Aerosol Can Explodes

Carol Bengle Gilbert
A police action is underway at Miami Airport due to an aerosol can exploding inside a passenger's checked luggage. Some media sources reported that it was a hairspray can that exploded as baggage handlers were loading it onto an American Airlines flight whose plane had just arrived from Boston. The luggage exploded with such intensity that a piece of the suitcase lodged in a baggage handler's shoe, the Miami New Times reported.

American Airlines? Flight origin Boston? Explosion? The circumstances evoke memories of 2001, when American Airlines Flight 11 was hijacked after departing Boston's Logan Airport and crashed into the World Trade Center. But for all those whose immediate reaction to hearing of the explosion at Miami International is to question whether it resulted from an act of terrorism, the answer appears to be no. News reports suggest it was merely a can of hairspray or some other aerosol exploding from pressure changes during flight.

NBC Miami reported that hairspray just made the no-fly list at Miami's international airport.

But a quick check of the Transportation Security Administration website reveals that, at least for now, personal care aerosols in reasonable quantities are still permitted on board planes as long as they are packed in checked luggage.

Miami International Airport's Concourse D, where the incident occurred, is open for business, but gates D11 through D19 are closed while the TSA investigates.

The measured reaction may stem in part from the after-the-fact nature of the investigation or possibly from the fact that it's only been three months since the airport closed for a bomb scare. In September, one of the terminals at Miami International Airport was evacuated and four concourses closed after the TSA found metal resembling a pipe in an elderly scientist's luggage. After an investigation, the suspected pipe bomb was declared harmless.

With the TSA's track record in closing the barn door after the horse has bolted, NBC Miami may be correct in surmising that aerosols are due for some strict scrutiny. They are already banned from carry-on luggage due to the risk of explosion. The TSA enacted a limited quantity rule for liquids known as the 3-1-1 rule after British officials discovered a plot to use liquid explosives to blow up a plane. The unpopular 3-1-1 rule is due to be discontinued, but this incident in Miami could result in passengers gaining the right to carry on more liquids while losing the right to bring aerosols aboard altogether.

Published by Carol Bengle Gilbert - Featured Contributor in Travel

2010 Yahoo! Outstanding Contributor of the Year, Carol has consistently been designated a Top 100 Yahoo! Contributor Network writer. She received a 2008 People's Media Award for "Best Article." Carol’s pr...  View profile

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Luke M.1/30/2011

    Another great article from a great content publisher!

  • Linda StCyr1/2/2011

    those little cans can explode in a frightening manner... not shocking at all.

  • CarolinaD12/30/2010

    What about "handle with care?"

  • Tiffany Booth12/29/2010

    Great work! Happy Holidays =0)

  • Krysha Thayer12/29/2010

    Great reporting!

  • Sherri Granato12/29/2010

    Great reporting Carol!

  • Sherri Granato12/29/2010

    AquaNet is the root of all evil! First for threatening the ozone during the 70's & 80's, and now this. : O

  • Mike Oberg12/28/2010

    Regulations on what is permissable to carry on airliners should be based on logic and facts, not media frenzies.

  • Charlotte Kuchinsky12/28/2010

    Great reporting Carol.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.